• Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I’ll write a whiny multipage diatribe to rage quit and insert a script to DDOS the instance that hurt my feelings. That’s the behaviour of a well adjusted adult that’s doing the right thing.”

    • M137@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The disturbing thing is that a LOT of people are like this. The older I get and the more I see of humanity the more it becomes clear most don’t mentally age past early teens and many who have big parts of them that don’t age past toddler behaviour.

    • volore@scribe.disroot.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Definitely the actions of a person who should be unquestioningly trusted to be the sole arbiter of determining what is fine and dandy and what goes too far on Lemmy. Totally not indicative of every legitimate concern that every single person opposing this brought up being accurate, surely not!

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My favorite reply from him when I called him out in a different thread: “why can’t you just let people use their own computers how they choose”

        I’m guessing he has never heard the wisdom of not throwing stones in a glass house. The cognitive dissonance is hilarious, though.

        • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That dude is an unbearable cunt as a mod as well. I am absolutely not surprised for the fact that he is an unbearable cunt as a developer.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            IIRC he banned people in all communities he moderated if he found someone that you broke a rule in only 1 community, idk what rules though

            • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes, he does. And he is very flexible in his own interpretation of the rules. He’s the kind of power-tripper I hoped leaving behind on reddit.

              • Malyca@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Hopefully he won’t come back, though evidently he’s rage quit before and come back

              • skisnow@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                ugh you’re giving me flashbacks of getting autobanned by a bot on one of the main leftist subreddits because I’d once posted in one of the right-wing subs (calling someone out on nazi bullshit).

                It’s infinitely frustrating to see a community of people who mostly just want a socialized safety net, money out of politics, less inequality and less genocide, get run by exactly the sort of people who seem like they’d be perfectly happy implementing gulags and Stasi on the first day of the revolution.

  • bequirtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh, egads! My Fediverse is ruined!

    But what if… I were to censor it, and disguise it as a server error?

    Ohoho, delightfully devilish, Patrick

        • ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m watching two users that have been defending him while skirting around the actual problems. Right now, I’m not fully sure if they are alts of his. They aren’t active at the same time, as in one stopped commenting a few hours ago and then the other started commenting, which I find suspicious.

          They’ve been called out as possible alts in this post and another tesseract post in this community. Neither have responded to the accusations though, which I also find suspicious lol

          And he’s still made recent comments on his Kirk account

          • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If this person is using alts and still commenting then they really, really need to touch grass. Thats gona be a fairly unhealthy psychological behaviour.


            Patrick if you read this please actually give yourself 48 hours offline. Disconnect and go have a cuppa with a friend or family member (or both). You don’t need to talk to then about any of this, the rest of the world doesn’t know or care anyway. :)

            Don’t worry about this cesspit, we’ll all be here being our lovely toxic selves when you come back.

    • It was especially stupid when everyone already was scrutinizing his code. Like users found his secret block list that was better hidden than this, and didn’t think anyone would find the ddos code? What a freakin’ moron.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly, my own block list is huge. Mostly keywords, very few users. I would recommend it to everyone. Any social media is unbearable without blocking shit out. Everyone should personalise blocklists to their tastes.

    But you can’t make this decision for people. This is why I also don’t like that some instances defederate a lot of other instances they don’t like (and no one tells newbies). There’s a niche for pre-populated block lists that are available and curated and transparent (like for ad-blockers).

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah I think sharing them is a great idea as long as people can opt in or out. Respect people’s agency.

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    oy vey-- I can be a real pill. but at least I can admit when I’m wrong. A lady/gentleman apologizes and exits stage left. One doesn’t simply ragequit with a side of DDoS!

    in all my years of slashdotting, Stumbling, Farking, Digging, redditry, and Lemming, I’ve never known anyone to go down this hard nor this bitter. WHAT A CUNT!

    This beloved character’s namesake deserved better

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And to top it all off, startrek website is going to defederate from db0 for TOTALLY REAL REASONS that aren’t just being a salty little bitch. They just can’t show you proof, cuz it’s doxxing.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        is it really website about trek, or is it twisted version of trek? like how LOTR has been twisted by a certain individual who is obsessed with it.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m fairly sure that’s his personal instance.

          There’s not much in the way of sane reasons to go from inactive to suddenly having an admin call out censorship being the ‘last straw’ causing the defed and refusing to show proof because “doxxing”.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I thought its dubvee org? Startrek website was/is a legit instance, a shitty one but legit.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone’s wrong sometimes that’s just the stale croutons in this human ceasar salad they call “life”. It takes a special kind of grit to be such a massive dog-rocket when your wrong tho

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Get used to it.

    Anyone with a Claude Code account can spew out a Lemmy (or any other service) client and make antisocial changes and dump it in the App Store. ✨

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not defending the existence of the blocklist… but if you’re really that upset about it then I would suggest asking for a refund.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We did. That’s why there was a whole public meltdown including a number of alt accounts.

      You another alt?

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did we really, though? Even the OP says they don’t actually care about the blocklist and are just piling on for the lulz.

        • volore@scribe.disroot.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t put words in my mouth. I said, quote, that I wasn’t upset, after you made a comment implying I was and that I should seek out a refund – I don’t use the Tesseract frontend, and never have. That doesn’t mean I “don’t actually care” about someone trying to play Reddit admin and sneakily impose their will onto the rest of the fediverse.

          If you want to make a stupid argument, that’s fine; but make it on your own, don’t rope me into it.

          • Melllvar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I wasn’t trying to misquote you, but you did imply that entertainment is your primary motivation.

            Quote:

            upset? heavens no, this is terrific free entertainment, this is hilarious to watch.

            To me, this sounds like someone who is pouring gas on a fire just to watch it burn.

            • volore@scribe.disroot.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well, today you learned that I can care about something stupid someone else did, and be entertained by how poorly they handled it, all at the same time. I’m glad I could help clarify things for you.

              See, to me, you sound like an alt of AdmiralPatrick, or possibly one of his few remaining friends, and seem to be here exclusively to make passive aggressive comments at his detractors and/or run defense for him. I wonder why that would be…

      • Thales@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Look where this user is based and how many comments they’re making defending AdmiralPatrick…

        • volore@scribe.disroot.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          last I checked, I’m still allowed to be entertained by weird things on the internet. if you aren’t, I recommend a bit more whimsy in your life.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Weird is your bad take combined with your account instance. Tone deaf af.

          • Melllvar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just think the reaction from fediverse users has been too harsh when you consider that Tesseract was free and open source software.

              • db2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Sure looks like it. Crazy ass has what he calls a boner for us it seems.

            • Goodeye8@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              If your free software is borderline malware (which it is because it’s intentionally depriving users access to certain information with a deliberate attempt hide that fact from the users) I think people have a right to be harsh.

              • Melllvar@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                If it is malware then harshness is justified, but I’d be willing to debate over the strict definition of malware and whether it technically applies here.

                But I don’t think most of the harshness we’ve seen is actually borne of that kind of outrage. Even the OP of this meme says they are not upset and are having a wonderful time.

                • Goodeye8@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I never said it’s strictly malware, I said borderline malware. It can’t be strictly malware because most definitions of malware focus on the malware taking (some or full) control of the system or extracting valuable information, things that generally pose as a direct threat of damage to the end user or system.

                  But restricting user access to information without the user knowing information is being restricted and taking deliberate steps to hide this is being done in the first place is all malicious behavior. If you asked from a layman if this should be considered malware behavior or not most people would consider this malware behavior, hence borderline malware.

                  And I don’t see how it not being “strictly malware” would change anything. People are outraged by what it is doing and how it is doing it, not by whether it fits the strict definition of malware.