• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Personal favorite was one time I referenced how an electric razor worked, and a redditor nitpicking the mechanism ended with ‘you’ll figure it out when you get your first boyfriend, honey.’

    Like.

    Buddy.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Less “Why do women have hair” and more “Why are developers spending time and money on peach fuzz when game development is already too expensive?”

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’ve always seen the argument coming from incels who want their game women to look like anime, but this is the first realistic take on it.

      Yeah, i don’t want to spend money on a new graphics card because some artistic vision includes peach fuzz. Realism in video games has met a new point where, we dont want to spend money on seeing more realism.

      Like it’s cool to see some realistic hair but i dont want to smell Geralt’s unwashed anus when i havent visited a bath house in a while. I cant speak for everyone, but realism isnt always necessary or better.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s funny you bring up Geralt when Witcher 3 has a specific setting just for realistic hair, and that setting would stress your system if it wasn’t up to snuff. Picked a poor example there.

        • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          That’s my point exactly though. Allowing someone to turn off Nvidia Hairworks so you can play on weaker hardware or get more fps is the right move. You had the choice and it should look good either way.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Part of the problem is everyone is on UE5 and UE5 does everything for you, which means the art of designing a game engine to efficiently do exactly what you want it to do for your unique game is a dead art. True innovation in game design is gone, so all you have are massive budgets trying to push as many photorealistic details down a standardized pipeline as possible to make a game look AAA.

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Wouldn’t it be a similar amount of graphics used as putting in a man’s beard?

        Also did most people have to upgrade their graphics cards to play Horizon: Forbidden West? I thought it was scaled to most people’s setups?

        With Horizon Forbidden West now available on PC, benchmarks have revealed whether the game plays better on AMD or Nvidia hardware. While GeForce GPUs put in a respectable performance, it’s clear that the port runs best on Radeon graphics cards.

        Despite its origins as a PlayStation 5 exclusive, you don’t need the best graphics card to play Horizon Forbidden West. In fact, the game appears to run well on aging pixel pushers, providing you’re willing to turn down a few settings and make use of dynamic resolution scaling (DRS).

        AMD’s victory in Forbidden West has been certified by Computer Base, which tested more than ten graphics cards across multiple generations and manufacturers, using a Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU to get its results.

        • edible_funk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          It’s ironic he brought up Geralt when Witcher 3 actually had a setting specifically for realistic hair that did stress your system if it wasn’t powerful enough.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I would say the key difference is that facial peach fuzz will be virtually invisible except in a close up still frame, and if it’s missing it won’t be missed.

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I’d counter by saying that girls and women playing this game would be able to identify with Aloy and real representation of women in media would be missed.

            • ceenote@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Suit yourself. I think that anything that’s invisible except in a close-up still frame is a poor use of resources in a video game, and that nobody would say “hang on, where’s her peach fuzz?”

              • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                You clearly have no idea how games work. Level of detail graphics has been a solved problem for well over two decades. Simply you render high detail up close and remove details at a distance when it wont be noticed.

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                This topic has already been debated to death.

                The game developers don’t care what you think.

                Women being accurately portrayed in media is important.

                • ceenote@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  I don’t know how to make it clearer that I’m not talking about representation, I’m talking about bloated game development. I’m a hairy guy, but hair on a man’s chest being modeled instead of just a texture would be a waste, too.

          • msfroh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Horizon Forbidden West added a “photo mode”, I think mostly just to show off how good the graphics can be (when nothing is being animated). It does look awesome. If you zoom the camera in, you get anatomically correct facial features.

            There might also be some conversation scenes with close-ups of Aloy. Depending on your graphics settings, you might get some extra details rendered.

            I am absolutely convinced that the game is not rendering fine hairs while you’re fighting robot dinosaurs, since, as you suggest, that would be kind of ridiculous.

            But, hey, you really kicked the shit out of that straw man! Great job!

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            It’s also possible that some details don’t render unless you are close enough to see it, and so it won’t take up much space

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Wouldn’t it be a similar amount of graphics used as putting in a man’s beard?

          Yes, but a beard on a man makes up a significant part of his appearance. A few barely visible hair do nothing for graphics except waste performance - a negligible amount tho, tbf.

          But then again, afaik, the in game model has none of this facial hair. It’s just on the box art.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Because it’s part of how you get realistic light scattering in the photo modes and visuals that people like?
      You can’t have realistic graphics without doing the things that make something look realistic.

      It’s the same reason they spend time figuring out how light moves through cheek skin: if the light doesn’t do that you look like a plastic sculpture and it’s wrong.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      There were very real tantrums about this in the gaming world.

      Just look at the reaction to the new God of War game.

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        even before this there were SWATHS of weird incels raging out bc aloy wasn’t “pretty” enough for them.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      How old are all y’all? This game isn’t that old, and hard R Gamers were screeching about Aloy’s facial hair and other parts of her design constantly, till they found out she was gay. All this is ignoring that when the first game released the character was a minor and chuds still screeched about how she wasn’t attractive enough.

  • A Sharky Anthro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m still flabbergasted by this ridiculous outrage, like, it was crazy. Calling a bit of natural peach fuzz a beard, crazy work. These incels and weirdos really are twisted ass dudes.

    Humans are mammals, so we’re a bit hairy, that’s genuinely not out of the ordinary for a regular woman to have a bit of peach fuzz. What isn’t normal is making it seem abnormal, these chuds, they’re truly tragic in so many ways.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      it’s ragebait.

      if you raged and took this seriously, they won.

      the point of posts like this is to make people flip out and get them to reply and push engagement.

      and it works. it worked on you.

      call them names all you want, you are giving them what they want.

      • A Sharky Anthro@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I didn’t take this seriously, it’s just confusing that this caused people to actually lose their minds. There’s no rage to be felt about this as all I feel is absolutely confused this passes for something to feel outrage over. ROFL It’s just weird to me that they never saw a woman up close, and knew that peach fuzz is a thing women have on their faces. I did call them names, but, incel does seem fitting in this case. More than ever.

        • starik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I think they’re saying that the OP’s OP’s OP was rage bait, i.e. the guy pretending not to know people have fine hair everywhere was just trolling.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            i also think it’s funny how enraged people are you suggest it’s rage bait.

            because clearly this is some huge problem, instead of stupid internet flaming bullshit.

            but ragebait works. people love being angry over stupid bullshit and projecting their angst at imaginary chuds that likely don’t really exist.

            • edible_funk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              No one is mad you’re calling it rage bait, though what you’re doing is rage baiting as well since if you were around the internet when that game released you know full well all the gamergate chuds lost their fucking minds. Fuckin dweebs are always so loud. Anyway yeah this was actual discourse for a month or two, not just assholes ragebaiting.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                My interpretation of gamergate, which I was there watching it happen live, was very very different than the popular narrative about it.

                But hey, what do I know, I only lived through it. I didn’t read about it through a bunch of idiot mainstream journalists who only focused on the ‘evil men vs innocent women’ narrative to score the post clicks.

                A lot of the ‘harassment’ that the key female figures received, never had any evidence. I also knew Zoey Quin, I went out with her on a date in 2011. She was an absolute nutcase, probably had BPD or something. Her grasp on reality was very tenuous before gamergate, so I doubt anything she said about those event was remotely truthful. And I’m sure her boyfriend there was also equally mentally ill.

                • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Oh holy shit you’re literally a gamergater. Fuckin, and you just admit that to people? You’re literally the guy in the fuckin meme, holy shit.

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I don’t believe a single word of this comment, but especially that you went on a date with Zoey Quin.

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                There were very real tantrums about this. Look at the reaction to the new God of War.

                Pretending like incels don’t whine about the “integrity of their games” and “woke bullshit” is silly.

                • starik@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  I know. Just saying it’s not clear in this instance. It seems almost too ridiculous to be real, but it could be.

        • DaniNatrix@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          The tag that I added to the above user’s handle gives me a good chuckle every time I see them in the wild. Helps balance the rank odiousnesses of many of their comments lol the irony of a troll like them calling something rage bait only adds to my glee.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s not something people often include. It’s more work too for no (?) benefit from the game studio’s point of view

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            It’s a game about robot dinosaurs. I don’t think they’re making their money on realism, exactly haha. But someone else mentioned how it could broaden the player base and that makes sense

            • guy@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Well, realistic bodies :) like how facial features during speech for example was the focus just a couple of years ago

        • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          The studio probably doesn’t set out with an exact artistic vision, and then arrive there as quickly as possible. Much more likely they decided 15 (or whatever) artists is enough for this project, and they are paying them until the project is done. For the artists, that means if they’ve met the bare minimum, then chasing smaller and smaller things to keep busy… Keeps them busy.

          Likewise, the studio is (hopefully) still within their estimate for the art budget, so there’s no one breathing down their neck about cutting costs there. It’s not worth it to fire people just because the work is done, especially if they might need that capacity for something close to release.

          Technically, the director (or someone) probably could tell them “That’s everything for now. Doomscroll until we need you again”, but that’s not really best for anyone - so effort spent on meaningless detail wins.

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            That’s what I mean. I feel like that’s all these big corporations care about

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Women play games. And men who appreciate attention to detail play games.

              The only people who might be turned away from buying this game because of this particular detail are incels. And why should a game studio cater to them?

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Incels are a big player base. But they’ve probably done the math on which one benefits them more

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Considering the game sold 8.4 million copies by April 2023, I don’t think the incel community is as big of a player base as you think.

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Does a game studio in this case actually care about that? I’d just expect them to want to make most money with least effort. That’s why I’m surprised

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              …they did? They made the game this way. This game is already out.

              I think it’s kinda funny that you’re surprised they would be inclusive. I’d bet there are quite a few women on the dev team and there are quite a few women who play these games.

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                I’m always surprised if a big corporation cares about anything other than making money tbh

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Why do you think that appealing to women and broadening their customer base would not make them money?

                  Has everyone forgotten that women play games, too?

    • rethnor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      This obsession with women not having hair sort of has pedo vibes to it. It’s like they want their pre-pubesent girl and not women.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nah, this one is more homophobic. Same reason why these people are obsessed with absurdly out of proportion breast implants. They need to signal to themselves and to the world that they definitely definitely aren’t ever even thinking of men as attractive. Yet somehow also a subculture obsessed with every man’s testosterone levels and muscles.

          • boomzilla@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Look again. Cox wrote the tweet and shared the image from the guy questioning the hair. Cox is woke as can be. This is another comment from him:

            A few of you, I think, read this wrong and have been angrily DMing to let me know women DO have hair. I promise you, I know this. ❤️ I’m just sharing another persons hot take.

            Also the tweet is from 2022 and I dearly hope he left the nazi cesspool by now.

      • guy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I don’t have kids, but doesn’t children have peach fuzz as well? Can’t remember for myself

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yes, children are born covered in peach fuzz. Sometimes babies even have dark hair covering their backs that fall out and leave just the peach fuzz behind.

          We’re mammals after all :)

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I hate that I have to clarify that I don’t like the new GoW because Ragnarok was bad, not because woman lead — all because of these low T creeps who are jealous of digital women having more facial hair than them.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, I didn’t really like the 2nd Horizon, not because they made Aloy less hot, but because the writing just wasn’t as good and progression basically mandates the stupid crafting hunts for hyper specific animals.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I didn’t mind that part of the sequel. The writing wasn’t as good though but my main issue weirdly was just that they give you a bunch more weapons and tools and no reason whatsoever to use most of them. Kinda fumbled with the design there, where in the first you needed every tool depending what you were facing off against.