if you killed every ape, you would disrupt the ecosystem and kill every human
Humans are apes.
This is a very simple concept, folks.
As an ape, I don’t know if I’m cool with Matt Walsh sucking my dick to save a human life.
I’m cool with it. For clout. I’m not even into dudes, but I’d like to contribute to his misery.
I hadn’t thought of it like that. Count me in for the story to tell, I guess.
Death cause: Choked on dick
Now that’s a complement!
And he’ll kill em all to save one.
Is… Is that ape Matt Walsh? 👉👈
I can only assume the single downvote is an error.
On Voyager, I have gestures for swipe to downvote and swipe farther to save. So, rarely, I downvote accidentally because my stupid ape thumbs don’t work. I’ve downvoted my own comments in solidarity.
I’m on Summit and I have the same set up. Based on the fact most of these comments have a downvote at least, I suspect it isn’t accidental and just a weirdo who hasn’t come to terms with basic science that even most of the fundamentalists agree with.
You could just go to Lemvotes and figure out the specific users who did as well.
Yeah, your upvotes and downvotes are public.
There are some religious weirdos here, so it could be them taking offence to a basic scientific reality
But we are apes… come on!
I’ll wager he’s also done sweet fuck all to save any human
Well yeah. When was the last time you saw someone who could be saved by genociding entities that haven’t cracked fire and sharpened sticks?
When was the last time you saw someone who could be saved by genociding entities that haven’t cracked fire and sharpened sticks?
Every malaria victim.
Yeah but how is his gorilladick game
quite the opposite. he is implicit in violence, calling for death to lgbt and POC people.
Quick Matt, you have to kill these apes to save this blavk person.
Uh…
taken further this is: “i’m the most important human of the humans to me … thus i will kill all of you to save me” absolute psycho type shit
nancy reagan sucked a ton of dicks and we still got the crack epidemic
Well, you can’t say she didn’t try.
Good old Nance the Throat GOAT
I mean, we don’t have a control case, so without her it could have been much worse.
To be fair, Nancy is widely regarded as the throat goat
Maybe we should have elected the rimjob queen instead
he’s still alive? ffs
Who the fuck is this bell end Matt Walsh?
A really funny guy who was one of the founding members of Upright Citizens Brigade. He went on to later co-star in the hilarious show Veep.
Oh… you mean the other one.
Who fucking cares
To the far right, an intellectual. To everybody else a moron.
Thankyou for that. So in short the man is a cock. :/
Cocks serve a useful purpose and are a source of pleasure so no.
They are always eager for violence, but paying for universal healthcare? Food and housing? Suddenly, they spew some bullshit about personal responsibility or somerhing.
That’s factually false.
He can save a lot of humans every day by doing something humanitarian and does not.
The only logical inference is that his motivation is not saving humans but killing apes.
Besides, if he DID kill all apes, the damage to complex ecosystems across the world that rely on interdependent species including apes would DEFINITELY lead to the deaths of more than one human.
Probably at least two.
Technically if he killed all apes killing all humans would be part of that process.
That’s technically still within the “at least two” range 😉
The best kind of correct.
The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right.
‘Technically correct’ is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.
no, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.
Hermes Correct, lol
Even 3!
Likely! Possibly 5!
“I hate every ape I see, from Chimpan-A to chimpanzee…” 🎶
Yep, lol.
Would you kill all apes to save one human? “Sure!”
Would you donate $500 to save one human? “Fuck no!”
Logical conclusion: “rather kill all apes than donate 500$”. Anyone with this mindset is a trash human being.
Maybe he just loves killing?
My assessment stands
Killing all humans probably does more good overall than saving one.
Which fact? The post is just two dickheads mouthing off at each other…
Who would kill every Matt Walsh to save one ape, tho?
Do I need to wait until he’s threatening an ape, or can we just kill him now?
Has he not already threatened them? Or does he have to name one specifically that he intends to kill before you can take action?
because humans are more important
How? Why? We are by far the most destructive animal on the planet. We would exterminate any other species that ever got close to doing as much damage.
because might makes right
that’s literally their argument. we’re special because we want to be because we can make it so by force
That’s also the only way to defeat them, unfortunately. Bullies can’t be argued with or debated or reasoned with. They must be beaten. With malice.
Matt Walsh is a dumbass. It’s a simple concept.
Humans are apes so I assume this means he’ll kill every last one of us to save himself.
Its always “I’m willing to kill for my pet peeve”, its never “I’m willing to die without hurting anyone else for my pet peeve”
Fuck this weird “masculinity” concept. Also fuck that beatle, Lennon or whomever, shitty ass imagine song. Same shit. Imagine a slight inconvenience, that will help your neighbors.
always “i would kill for X” or “i would die for X” and never “i would commit to a modest but long-term effort for the betterment of X”
It’s because committing to a modest but long-term effort is harder than killing obviously.
Seriously. Forego the killing and death and just volunteer in your local community, but I guess that doesn’t sound as edgy in a tweet.
“I would kill without x too, but if it does x then that’s cool too, I guess”
