- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I’m gonna delete the account after selling my Quest 2 for the Steam Frame
You must log in or register to comment.
I understand there’s arguments about “this is not new, they’ve been working on VR for a decade” - fine, but it’s Zuckerberg, who apparently never does anything in good faith (see: the Winklevoss twins, Whatsapp, Snapchat, Libra, etc)
I’m sure they only have VR in order to onboard people to blue app. People have gotten banned and their only recourse is to buy an Oculus. Convenient.
Wasn’t that the obvious deal from the beginning? You buy the subsidized hardware and ignore Facebook’s gravity as long as you can. That’s the catch for the low price.
Anyone who thought otherwise is, well, thinking wishfully.
Big tech in general. At this point the only one I still have faith in not too fuck over customers “because they can” is Valve.
on that note I finally deleted facebook. Goodbye meta!
Better late than never!
I’ve had an account under a nickname for coordinating dog meetups for ages. One day the account was suddenly blocked without prior notice and the only way they would let me in again is by giving them my ID, which would not help as the account was under my nick and I would never give them my ID anyway. They didn’t even let me delete that effing zombie account without identifying my name as real or even just change the Nick to something FB recognises as real name.
They’ll ghost you even if you do give them everything they ask for. I can’t even make a new account under my real name or anything close to it anymore.
It sucks it’s the only realistic platform for discovering and getting info from interest groups in my area.
the only realistic platform
you know of, I don’t know where you live (nor do I want to) but alternatives do exist and if not you can self host some.
Ah shit you’re right! They’re going to love having their social media on stevesbasement.social. So accessible to the general public!
Your sarcasm and learned helplessness help BigTech. I didn’t say it was easy, I said it was feasible.
I’m not denying it’s technically feasible. I do deny learned helplessness. I have limited energy in life. Using it on making a change I’m not passionate about is a recipe for severe burnout. If i get more involved and find there’s sentiment towards a migration away from FB then I’d spend some energy on building and facilitating that. Barging in and making demands isn’t an effective way to build community. You can introduce ideas and develop them over time to show that it comes from care for and dedication to the org.
So yeah it’s unrealistic on the time scales I’m concerned with.
When you generalize your position about your available time and technical knowledge as the limiting factor for everybody you are not saying it’s impossible for you, you’re saying it’s impossible for anybody and everybody. That’s the problem. It’s like saying “I don’t like this food” versus “It tastes bad!”. For you they are equivalent, for others they are totally different. I’m not saying you, or anybody else, should learn about self-hosting (federated) social platforms then set some up, what I’m rejecting instead is giving up pre-emptively on the behalf of others because it’s giving power back to BigTech.
A good opportunity to ditch Meta if you’re still using it for some reason.
Can’t, need the Marketplace, unfortunately.
MySpace marketplace?
It’s infuriating, really.
Add 1 Jan 1970.
I just pick random shit. Pretty sure Steam thinks I’m 113 years old.
Admittedly this did backfire once when a company wanted my birthday to verify my ID to unlock an account. They were surprised I lied and I was surprised people don’t.
At least be exact! 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z.
Or if they allow it, just 0
Unix/Epoch time👌
December 7, 1941.
How to tell the techs you’re lying without telling the client
…so far, it seems like all the platforms accept january 1st 1900 without issue…
1 jan 1970
…too plausible to make the statement unambiguous…
I do 1/1/1984 but also a good idea
I always use the birthday of a friend of mine. That way if they if I have to validate something in the future, I’ve used a consistent date.
I’ve been using 6/9/1969 since I was 11 using the same rationale and haven’t found a compelling reason to change.
1.1.1970 is consistent and easy to remember (at least for nerds like me)
Thankfully I haven’t had to use any Meta products for a while now, and as far as Alphabet is considered I’ll turn 126 years old on 01/01/2026 and live where my country’s parliament building is. Because fuck them, that’s why.
No thanks ,I’m gone🖕
Sorry about your gooner helmet
1/1/1
just set it to the January 1st of whichever year would make you 13 when you registered your account 😏 (I remember a platform deleting the account of someone when they, years later, revealed that they were under 13 when they registered)
Removed by mod
Because it is not a post about Facebook but about the VR Headset Quest 2 and/or 3.
Sadly, the Meta Quest is kind of the best deal in the PC VR world.
Removed by mod
It is about Facebook. Facebook makes the Meta Quest. It’s a Facebook product. Just like Threads, Instagram, and WhatsApp are. And those Meta glasses that are ugly AF.
Officially it is Meta. Facebook is owned by Meta but the Quest headset is not a Facebook product. I get it, it’s easier to say Facebook for everything owned by Zuk, like saying Google for Youtube instead of Alphabet.
But it is not precise nor true and plenty of comments here are saying “just leave Facebook” while OP did not post about Facebook nor having a social media account there.
And TBH, I think all VR headset are kinda ugly, it’s either big rectangle brick on your head or big round brick on your head.
It’s all Facebook. Meta is a company made by Facebook, but it’s all Facebook, or it’s all Meta — same thing.
It might not have Facebook branding, but it’s a Facebook product, or a Meta product. Again, same thing.
This is super silly. They changed the technical arrangements of the company names, meta is still Facebook
Facebook is meta, nitpicking this point is absurd
It’s not silly at all. There’s a practical reason why they changed their name. Facebook is one of many products from the company. Facebook is Meta but Meta is not Facebook.
The “practical reason” is to distance themselves from the rep they’ve earned as slop-pushing privacy-invading child-abusing culture-destroying ghouls. Why would you go along with that?
I mean, that would make sense if it actually achieved that. But it doesn’t, because that describes all of their products.
Head in sand levels of cope
I believe they were talking about meta’s literal smart glasses being ugly, not their VR headsets. They look really silly, the frame is way too thick.
I actually think the Quests are some of the better looking headsets.
I think it’s pretty heavily implied that people are talking about a given tech giant’s entire ecosystem when they say de-google, delete Facebook, Fuck Nestle- I mean, fuck Apple, etc. lol
There’s a reason it’s the cheapest. You pay with your privacy.
Yup, i paid my $1,000 for my index and it was the best purchase I ever made love that thing. I’m definitely getting a steam frame as well not because I don’t love my index anymore but it would be nice to have something that is a little more flexible with the space.
Well there is that but there’s also that they’re just trying to make the Metaverse happen, so to speak. Get as many people as possible onboarded and using the product and making it mainstream before recouping losses. Fortunately that’s a stupid idea with no practical value and it seems they’re starting to realize that so they’ve reallocated the budget to the next stupid thing they’re trying to make happen with no practical value.
It’s more than that. It’s a hostile business move to corner the market and kill off other brands, they absolutely had the money to accomplish this. The brand image? They failed that speech check. Beyond that, there simply isn’t enough interest in VR to make a killing off of a monopoly even if they had one.
It’s a hostile business move to corner the market and kill off other brands
Huh? How do you figure that?
The brand image? They failed that speech check.
What?
there simply isn’t enough interest in VR to make a killing off of a monopoly even if they had one
You and I know that but it didn’t stop Fuckerberg from sinking tens of billions of dollars into it.
A) sell at a loss to take smaller players off the board because they can’t compete at those prices. Because they can’t afford to sell at a loss.
B) speech check is an RPG saying. Basically they’re trying to fool the user but the users didn’t fall for it.
C) correct. He made a mistake thinking he could get people to use VR on a level like WALL-E or ready player one. He tried to make one dystopia happen and failed because we’re not quite at the level of desperation that we need or can acceptably make VR vacations a viable product.
Oh, goody! Maybe they’ll send me a present! Can I send them my address, too, so they know where to mail it? Meta is so nice!
I cancelled my preorder for the OG Oculus Rift so fast when they announced the Meta buyout
