The highest calorie last meal
Happy cake day!
nah, this is just the appetizer to a big bowl of pasta made out of antimatter.
Antipasti
I mean, you can heat any old rock & make it look like that … what I’m saying is that every rock, when heated to 500+°C, will gain delicious orange flavour, but scientists don’t want you to know that!!
I wanna taste that blue Cherenkov tang
I wanted to say the same - that blue color reminds me of blueberry with some mint for freshness!
Evidently plutonium just tastes metallic. And radium is flavorless.
What I’m saying is people have tasted these things.
What about butt-chugging them?
Demon core has entered the chat?
Demon buttplug
I think it was when we got to toxic metals and radioactive elements that chemists where forced to stop tasting their discoveries.
I hope it went: Safety person: Hey! Stop tasting any elements or new molecules. It’s been getting people severely sick or killed!
Chemist: “Ugh, fine, but ima bitch about it the whole time”
It’s coincidentally when we started getting radiation poisoning. Correlation? Causation? The younger generation is so weak smh.
I can still huff them though, right? How else will I know when my reaction is done?
I believe the guy who tasted plutonium did so accidentally when the powder got in his mouth. The metallic taste probably has something to do with how radioactive it is.
Or the fact that it’s, y’know, a metal
idk man. the tins I’m drinking out of don’t really ‘taste metallic’, whereas when I got shot up with radioactive elements, I definitely described it as “having a metallic taste in my mouth”.
(Oh and the answer is ‘radiology’ — shooting people up with radioactive elements is literally everyday stuff. There’s a whole branch of medicine about it; “nuclear medicine.”)
deleted by creator
The food colouring they add to the orange juice (from those pods) makes it actually taste better!
I was about to say that in the 40s and 50s someone
probablytaste it.The best way to tell precisely how spicy your rock is, is to taste it. That’s just basic science, if you ask me.
Zomg, where are all the warning labels???
Fun fact: a gram of plutonium contains about 20 billion calories. Yum.
Not dietal calories.
The calorie numbers we assign to food, measure how much energy our body extracts from them when eaten.
In this context, plutonium is closer to 0
If we instead want to measure the actual total physical energy content of materia, we would turn to E=mc^2, telling us that a gram of anything has about 20 million kcal, no matter if its plutonium or diet coke. which is a slightly less useful value on food labels :D
Technically it measures how much you can heat up a known volume of water if you burn the food. We have no way of measuring how much of that energy released by combustion actually gets absorbed and translated to ATP in the body, but it’s the best estimation we have of the relative energy content of foods.
There’s some carbohydrates, proteins, and fats that our bodies don’t seem to convert to energy (or only partially convert) but still technically contain “calories” because they’re combustible. Sugar alcohols, fiber, etc.
Plutonium doesn’t combust, but it would heat up water in a calorimeter. Really the test method’s applicability kind of falls apart when you start testing undigestible materials.
And it goes straight to my hips. By which I mean the bone marrow in my pelvis.
These hips don’t lie : you got cancer
Why the pelvis specifically? How did it get there? What were you doing with it?
Hey, sexy bone-marrow pelvis, shake them atomic gains!
(OK, but like, if I produced synthetic plutonium I would make the box look like a chocolate box. Those workers & engineers deserve to have a fun work environment, engage in some shenanigans, make an oopsie from time to time.)
This is a commonly quoted fun fact that is not really true. There are 2 different definitions of calorie. One means the absolute amount of energy in an object, the other means the bioavailable amount of energy that a human can extract from it using their digestive system.
So every physical object that exists has some amount of potential energy contained within it which we can express in calories, but that doesn’t mean it has any bioavailable calories. For example glass has some significant amount of energy contained within it, but it has 0 bioavailable calories.
This “fun fact” mixes up the two definitions, making the statement meaningless.
(Nothing against you OP, this is a commonly repeated falsehood)
Thank you for the clarification. I wanted to go along with the joke of it looking “edible”, but context is appreciated :)
this is a commonly repeated
falsehoodobvious jokeAnd, if I have to explain the joke: it’s just E=mc² (the Einstein thing … well, the Einstein’s thing’s approximation), the energy (E) is the same for all mass (m) since the c is a constant.
You get the same 21 billon kcal from 1g of apples as from 1g of plutonium.
And since it’s usually well known humans do not devour mass into pure energy that might trigger ppls sense of humour.
(Additionally the idea of eating metal to seek nutrition might be funny, but we do need some metals \m/.)Also “potential energy” phrasing is weird in that context.
There are 2 different definitions of calorie.
This “fun fact” mixes up the two definitionsIt’s not even two definitions, the kcal is absolutely the same, it’s just used to measure two different things (mass energy vs the sum of what an average human can extract via chemical processes). I see you def understand that, but it’s not a different definition of a calorie (in the same way as length vs width of an object isn’t a different definition of a metre).
It is a different definition, but it’s the same unit… it’s also more like saying “that ball of yarn is 10 metres” - the ball itself isn’t 10 metres long in any dimension, but the meaning is clear given the context, as it would if you said “it’s 0.05 metres”. By having two meanings distinguishable by context, it seems like two definitions to me.
(Different definition/pov of what is measured, yes, that is where the joke is.)
Hehe, look at this falsehood - there is no way this things can talk!
(However imho this is a more clear example of ‘two different definitions’ of the main concept/phrase intentionally mixed together for comedic effect, bcs words can explicitly have more than one meaning, and yes, usually you can tell from the context.)
This pic is def:
This “fun fact” mixes up the two definitions, making the statement meaningless.
Which definition does full corn kernels fall into?
If you eat just one bite you’ll never have to eat again for the rest of your life!
Equivalent-level of fun fact: 1 gram of hay contains that much calories too!
No wonder cows are so fat
deleted by creator
Deliciously ever-hot orange pie
It is for sure delicious, but those who tested, never said it
We need a cosmological law dictating harmful to humans = boring-looking. I mean, it isn’t just plutonium, look at uranium yellowcake! It’s lemon flavouring!
Some Pu solutions for your viewing pleasure:
I like how all these pictures include the radiation fucking up the photo.
that looks like a sponge x3
SpongeBomb SpallatePants
It looks like the underside of a microfiber towel
Yellowcake, sponge… lemon flavoured sponge cake?
Square pringles 😋
This whole image is metal as fuck \m/
Isn’t it just that color because it’s hot? Like, if you cooled those off to room temperature, wouldn’t they be metallic gray?
Cooling down means it’s breaking down and no longer plutonium.
I’m talking about thermally cooling it down. If you put it in a freezer it will cool down, but the nuclear process will not change speed.
Good luck with cooling down unmoderated plutonium.
liquid nitrogen will do
That’s why they have it in a frying pan
just take a cheese grater to it to make smaller pieces smh
deleted by creator
What would happen if you played hockey with that?
The ice melts.
And you get cancer
A lot of people get cancer already and ice also already melts all the time so I don’t see why this is so special
That’s plutonium. You would die of radiation poisoning long before you could ever even come close to developing cancer.
And here I thought plutonium looked like this:
Kinda, in solution different oxidation states make pretty colors…
You mean plutonium doesn’t look like a vial of cherry flavored cough syrup suspended in a larger vial of water?
Yes, it does look delicious.
But I can’t help but think about this being the consequences of dying everything we eat unholy colors. Maybe radioactive material wouldn’t be so tasty looking if we didn’t give kids candy that looks like radioactive material.
Counterpoint: fruit
Even oranges aren’t neon orange
if you can wait a few million years, after few decay steps it turns into lead, which is known to be sweet
You only get one chance to find out!
What do the dots taste like?
