You must log in or # to comment.
all this does is amplify the message. Banksy is brilliant.
You call that erasing?
Maybe it’s like tattoo removal. It’s never really gone because something-something white blood cells. Or takes hundreds of sessions until it’s gone.
Removing it, of course, creates a Streisand effect and add more fuel to the Palestinian cause.
Am I the only one bothered by the fact that the most recent picture is not on the right side?
Not all cultures read from left to right.
looks at caption above image
looks at image
Sure… but like… PICK ONE.
Only 95% of them…
Banksy used something to etch the stone before applying the paint knowing they’ll try to wash it off.
Edit: more context, the building that has the art is 150 years old so they can’t just replace the tiles. They are going to have to take some layers off.
The people removing the graffiti couldn’t even be bothered to change the border. Still clearly an outline of a power imbalance.
Banksy knew that it would look like this if they tried to remove it. He put it on a building where they couldn’t just break a chunk of wall off, but they had to remove it. He understood exactly what kind of commercial removers were out there, he understood that it would leave a shadow.
Banksy has experimented with this theme before, of the art being destroyed, where the act of destruction is like a transaction.
One of his paintings was sold at auction, and when the bidding was closed, the big frame the work was displayed in began shredding the drawing. Except with the murals the “destruction” of the art was carried out by the state bureaucracy that the work is critiquing. But its a mundane, meaningless sort of removal. Human creativity and expression of injustice, likely worth millions, wiped away because of faceless, mindless state bureaucracy.
This is what makes Banksy an incredible artist. The after shot is the art.
Are there any other examples besides one of the most famous and expensive art pieces?
Most of his works have been moved or destroyed, I think. He’s had works washed off, he’s had works vandalized, the walls where a work resided has been broken out and then the wall has been sold to collectors.
He spray painted a piece onto plywood at a charity Boys Club, confirmed with the people running the club that the work belonged to them, so they removed it and eventually sold it for a pretty penny to keep the club running.
That dynamic seems to have always been present. I’m seeing some people saying he even may have etched the wall first, so I’m not sure. But with stuff like this you have to assume it was the artist’s intention. This is what artists spend all their time thinking about and discussing! In art school even, beginner students are made to critique every line and mark of each others work. Any single piece of art itself is a conversation with the history of art. We aren’t used to thinking like that, we think of art works as commodities with a dollar value. I promise you, banksy does not think that way
It’s fine if you like banksys art, i do too, we have a saying that “you can get away with things as long as you keep it clean”. (Poorly translated)
If the owner or rightsholder of the property he defaced/vandalised/painted on, decides to restore it, sell it, keep it, whatever. That’s entirely up to them. Always was.
There’s no “dynamic”, he wants to make a statement, so he goes out and vandalises a piece of property to amass attention. In theory, it’s no different than the “just stop oil” people trying to throw paint at the Mona lisa or some random stores windows. Vandalism is vandalism.
Ofc he also produces art that isn’t vandalism. But he rose to fame for his vandalism. I think it’s with keeping in mind.
No
That’s a 4D chess move, if that’s true. I do remember the Bansky shredded artwork event, that was wild.
What are the chances banksy was the masked person who covered up the mural it seems to be done with intent to keep the silhouette perfectly. The banksy crew had to have known it was going to be covered up and they planted someone to be the cleaner-upper? Or this whole thing is a sanctioned stunt… It seems there is people within the system that want it to change.
They only did more damage by erasing it, they just proved the point Banksy was making.
I don’t know, it seems quit obvious that that was the whole point. He might even done it himself
It’s an admission of guilt.
Left panel: the person on the ground is defending themselves with a berserker sword from the attacking wraith wielding a hammer of unjust suffering.
*Broken berserker sword
Before on the left. After on the right. We’re not fucking weebs.
Y weebs unfuckable??
Is it the exaggerated nosebleeds?
You sure about that
Well I’m not
It really does feel more powerful half-erased lol
The final form of the art piece. Honestly, I wouldn’t even be surprised if Banksy anticipated this. It wouldn’t be too tough to predict that the government would respond this way.
why clear it and leave a silhouette?? why just don’t leave an entire square silhouette to no one ever knows what was there.
because the picture was taken only partway through the removal.
It’s still pretty artsy. You can totally get the message without the finer details.
Calculated?
The worst part is that it’s the more progressive party that is doing this.
It’s a grade 1 listed building, it’d have to go no matter what it was.
Banksy would have known this beforehand, it’s masterful actually.
Space Invader put a mosaic on a listed building where I live. We didn’t have police blocking it, it wasn’t removed the next day. It was removed eventually and it was investigated but I didn’t have the Big Brother feel to it.
New Labour are regressive as shit.
It’s just that the Tories are even more regressive and Reform are complete total nutters.
I think it is pretty clear by now that Keir Starmer is a seat warmer for Nigel
He’s behaving like that’s his goal even. It’s just hard to fathom. Like is he a plant? I don’t see how you could set the table better than what he’s doing right now.
Blairites were never purged from the party.
Whoever thinks that twat will make things better in stad of worse is delusional
I’m not sure “progressive” is the right term for the neoliberal war machine doing what it does to manufacture consent, but also not living in the UK so take that with a grain of salt I suppose.
I said “more progressive”. Their are definitely more progressive then the alternatives.
Certainly less progressive than the greens
Right on. Who do we need to bribe around here to get a “more progressive” representation that’s actually left of center…?
