I’m still searching for a job. On some of these applications they want a 1-3 minute video of me just answering questions to myself and send it in. If feels scammy, but maybe I’m just not doing it right. What do you do?

  • Coyote_sly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Any place that asks for this is a place I have no interest in working. I’ll consider making an exception when they submit their video to me first.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, employers need to be legally restricted from learning anything about you besides your resume.

    The only thing you get to know about them is what they present online.

    We want equal and fair relationships with the employers that we are forced to depend on for survival.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Hell are you on about? Interviews are for both parties to get to know one another. Just nailed one last week where both of us were more interested in company culture and personality fit than technical expertise. Offer comes Monday. $90K.

      FFS, y’all need to grow the fuck up and realize the employers aren’t holding all the cards. Been at Lowe’s for 3-months. Worked hard, kicked ass, learned, already got a promotion. I’ve moved up, or at least laterally, to a better position in every job within 6-months, tops. And I’ve had loads of jobs.

      Or, you can just turtle up, cry that’s it’s all hopeless and unfair. How’s that working out guys?

  • DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, absolutely not. I’ve had one employer try that shit with me and immediately withdrew my application. They basically have AI review your video and judge you based purely off of your physical characteristics. Honestly I don’t know why an employer would want to open themselves up to the liability of using such a tool. Ultimately, if my application isn’t worth the time and effort of an actual person to review, then I’m not interested in your position.

  • mac@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    My ex had to do this a lot. She’s ESL though so I just figured that was the reason.

    I’m a softwate engineer and never saw anything like it before myself, but I didn’t think much of it because my own interview process is so fucked up lol.

    I’d kill to only have to do that and go through other behaviorals 🤣

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    No. I did one once. It felt incredibly degrading. I decided then that I would never do one again. I am a person. Not fucking cattle at the county fair. If a company feels my time is worth less than theirs and I’m just supposed to trot on out and look pretty so they can gawk at me and decide if they think I’m worth a chance at the “grand prize”, without including me in the conversation, then we are NOT going to be a good fit.

  • killabeezio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the tech world, some companies want you to do a take home project. They say things like, this will only take an hour, yet it normally takes like 4+ hours for most people. Anyway, I finally got one interview like this and I will not work for a company that pulls this crap.

    I decided to go through with it and just post it online for anyone to see. I did the project, sent them the GitHub URL and did everything exactly as they asked. They responded with, can you make that a private repo and give the people permissions that need it. I told them I would rather keep it public and that I won’t be doing that. I never signed an NDA, so there was no way for them to force me to take it down.

    Fuck all these places that do this type of shit.

    • breezeblock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      You’re telling me you prefer 3x55 minute live pressure coding compared to a take home 4x60 minute chance to write something in your own time in your own way without someone looking over your shoulder? Give me the latter 10/10!

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No. Never. It’s demeaning and unnecessary.

    I know it happens nowadays, but I’ve been on both sides of the hiring process and I refuse to have any part in it.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a hiring manager I find it to be a complete waste of time. I’d rather talk to someone for 15 min and decide whether or not to push forward with a longer format interview than waste 5 watching a video.

  • benignintervention@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I did one a few months ago for a university. When I was done it asked for feedback, so I submitted some along the lines of, “I understand you may have numerous applicants, but this interview format does not align with the respect or attentiveness I expect from an employer.”

    Needless to say, no call back

    Edit: a word

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      As I stated elsewhere, I refuse to take part in any hiring process that involves a one way video aspect. But I’m not 100% against using it as a filter: The first bar in the hiring process is to refuse the video interview.

      • benignintervention@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I knew as soon as they sent me instructions that I would refuse the job, but I figured it was good interview practice since I’ve only done 3 in 10 years

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a two way street even if it’s designed to not feel that way. They were right to reject you, because they already fucked up on your end… Maybe piles of money could’ve brought you back, but it clearly wouldn’t have been a healthy match

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        I think you misread the comment, OP rejected them before they rejected OP, OP was however kind enough to provide feedback on about their recruiting practicies.

  • dvallej@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on the role and the company, but if they make you do an AI interview without a human recluter’s screening first that is a red flag for me

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Major companies like JnJ do this, so if you wouldn’t bother then you’re likely turning away good jobs.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I have worked for a large company and for a small company, a small company has always been better, both in terms of pay and the actual job.

      • Sciaphobia@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would argue you’re never going to be treated with more respect by a company than during the interview process. Once you’re on the payroll you have an incentive to tolerate objectionable treatment. If a company is willing to be this audacious in the interview stage I would have little hope of it getting better in that regard.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If your employer doesn’t respect you, it’s not a “good” job, even if it’s a well-paying job.

      • TabbsTheBat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ never heard of them, so probably not a job im qualified for anyways x3

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why do I have a feeling they are talking about the horrible company, Johnson and Johnson. You know, the company that has been actively fucking America’s best interests and health over for decades

          • TabbsTheBat@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The acronym would fit :3

            You know, the company that has been actively fucking America’s best interests and health over for decades

            Not american not one im familiar with, still x3. Guessing insurance by that tho

          • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Every healthcare company has been fucking America for decades. They’re all unethical as shit. I’m just giving general advice to get a good job and paycheck for yourself.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not exactly neurotypical and I’m not good at in-person interviews. When I did video interview when applying for a training course, I did fine, because I wrote down a script. …What I’m getting at is that this video interview could have been an email. (Edit: Also didn’t get chosen for the course, so, meh)

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not a scam but it’s also not likely to lead to a job. Large companies that get massive amounts of applications use them. But smaller companies may also get a lot of applications and just do traditional phone screens, so who knows?

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, HireVue. My company uses them for some job postings at the discretion of the hiring manager.

    In general I don’t like them. I’ve seen some job postings that get literally hundreds of applicants though, so I get the company would look for ways to process that many more efficiently. I also think it would be difficult for a hiring manager not to judge an applicant on “video presence”, hardly a skill that is top of the priority list for most jobs.

    If AI sorting of videos is available I’ve not seen my company use that feature. To my knowledge, all videos are reviewed by humans. From a previous Lemmy posting about HireVue, I also learned it can be set to only allow one attempt at recording and answering a question, or unlimited.

    I kinda think of it as an escalating arms race. Companies put filters in place for resumes. Applicants found tools that aid them in mass applying with a single click. Companies add more filters like HireVue now to deal with the flood of applicants. Applicants are replying by declining or posting to GitHub or whatever.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s Hirevue, I stopped bothering after 5 or so, I’d never got through one and yet managed to get through every single HR phone screen etc.

    It depends if it’s AI grading it or not I guess, as AI has no understanding of nuance so will just accept a very narrow range of similar candidates