• NoWay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So does Pokémon canonical have Jesus being nailed on the cross? Maybe it was Mew the only son of Arcaues? Would make Mewtwo the Antichrist?

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember there was an episode where someone pulls out an actual gun, meaning Pal World is probably more canon than people realize.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Multiple episodes had guns. There’s the banned Dratini episode of course, but James is literally robbing a store with an MP 40 in Squirtle Squad.

          After the Porygon episode, right at the time Ash meets Blaine, TR only seems to carry generic bad-guy bazookas. Pokemon figured out what their identity was gonna be REAL fast.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting how when the Democrats are in power they struggle to get legislation across the line, get “outraged” when Republicans stymie their efforts, and eventually agree to cut bills down to the point where they’re achieving a fraction of what they were supposed to.

    But when Republicans are in power, Dems seem incapable of putting up any resistance and cry to their voters that if only they just had a few more donation dollars they’d be able to defeat fascism and then turn around and let the Republicans pass whatever awful legislation they want.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was one of the reasons I was excited that Walz was on the ticket. The democrats in MN passed a lot of progressive legislation with a 1 seat majority.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      when Republicans are in power

      That’s when Bernie starts making a hell of a noise and proposing the most progressive bills he knows will never make it.
      You would have to be really stupid to fall for this, and there’s a saying for it too but when even one of their presidents can’t even recite that you know they are a lost cause.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nailed it. That’s the scheme. Provides plausible deniability, while keeping half of the electorate from seeking options that would hurt the corporate bottom line.

    • adm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I cussed out one of those donation seeker calls. I feel bad about it. It was one of the worst rants I think I’ve ever done. They used my number from the 2020 election to call and ask for money in 2025. Furious.

        • rational_lib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ranked choice voting already exists in several local and state races, most recently DC. It’s mostly blue states, because Democrats tend to allow it. Several Republican states have legislation banning it statewide, but such laws are entirely absent in blue states.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Both sides the same!!! Except no one changes my voting district, because one to many black people moved in!

            Imagine living in a balanced voting district that hasn’t changed in years. Where ideas change the outcome, not a congress and a judge distorting public power.

            Anyway both sides bad and nothing weird about southern states and their voting districts.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bit more than performative. It’s pacifying. It manages to convince a lot of people that it does everything in its power so said people shouldn’t feel like there’s anything else to be done but vote again next time.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least we never went socialist.

    That will provide me a lot of comfort when the Fascists brutally murder me and my family for our dissent. At least they weren’t filthy socialists that tried to feed, cloth, or house me without condition. What a nightmare hellscape that would have been.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    cory booker is, at the time I’m writing, filibustering the senate and preventing any actions by the fascist-controlled Congress

    if he continues for 30,000 hours, the trump administration will be over and he’ll have singlehandedly saved what’s left of democracy. that would be unlikely, but, maybe it wouldn’t be hard for 30000 people to slow down fascism by one hour each. or 2 million people to slow fascism down by a minute.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So how do I step in and filibuster for him?

      Because I’m not a memeber of congress and have no power to do anything.

      I think we are expecting the representatives we gave all our power to to do something with that power.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        actually, there is a way you could: the senate chaplain gives a prayer every day at the senate and can have a guest chaplain do it. the current chaplain, Barry Black, has served since 2003, so you could ask to give the prayer

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        i believe in you, i think you can figure out something to slow the fascists by a minute

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah people are missing your point and thinking you’re praising Booker’s specific action as the solution rather than what (I think) you’re actually doing, which is praising action in general and encouraging others to recognize and take up whatever actions they can/will in lieu of inaction.

          Good on you.

          • Match!!@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah i don’t expect booker to singlehandedly stop trump, i don’t expect anyone to do it alone. but booker has slowed the senate by a day, and the trump administration’s days are numbered (at 1389, probably)

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are some limitations to the Filibuster:

      • things that don’t require a senate vote don’t get a filibuster
      • confirmation hearings for secretaries and judges don’t get a filibuster
      • certain types of bill such as budgets, so long as they avoid specifically off limit contents, don’t get a filibuster

      Also of note is Trump’s term could get a lot shorter if after the midterm elections the 53 GOP senate seats became closer to 40 and/or if enough GOP were convinced to vote to remove Trump.

      Any Democrat is better than Any Republican.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            As I said in another thread elsewhere on the same subject a while back:

            The Protest Vote Paradox™

            As we’ve all read time after time in the months leading up to the election, the Protest Vote™ simply states states that:

            “We refuse to vote against a Tyrant-Felon in order to send a clear and concise message that we will not stand for [roll D20 for random popular single issue], and alongside our refusal to vote against the Tyrant-Felon, is a collective hope that the aforementioned clear and concise message- if ignored, is received under unmitigated duress!”

            -Cut to Tyrant-Felon’s win, and the aftermath:

            Whether observed or not, the behavior of the Protest Voter will attempt to achieve the following:
            • Obnoxiously tell everyone: “We told you all what would happen!”
            • Onnoxiously claim there is: “No way protest voting could cause trump to win.”

            As both of these options cannot simultaneously be true in the same reality without breaking important time-space things that we would probably prefer not be broken- we are left with only a few logical conclusions:

            1. Protest voters have no idea what they’re talking about.
            2. Protest voters don’t understand the concept of hypocrisy.
            3. Protest voters have somehow learned to defy reality and become exempt from the concept of paradoxes, thus creating an entirely new study of theoretical science, known as Bulletproof Symbiotic Hypocrisy Theory, or BLsHt.

            Something, something, something Ted Talk.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is just a long-winded, inverted version of the aphorism about liberals’ paradoxical view of progressives; they’re a small, niche group, and the Democrats shouldn’t try to appease them because they’ll just alienate mainstream voters by courting this insignificant block of voters. However, progressives are somehow also a large, powerful cabal that can be blamed for every major Democratic loss.

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Name one moment in history where abstaining from the bare mimimim to avoid catastrophic consequences results in a net gain.

                I ask this because you’re trying to make this party thing where I’d title paring attention and reading for context- you’ll see clearly that It’s an ACTION thing.

                Interesting that you went to progressives so quickly though. Especially since I never even mentioned the word.

                That says a LOT.

                • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Name one moment in history where abstaining from the bare mimimim to avoid catastrophic consequences results in a net gain.

                  Name a point where I said abstaining from voting was good. My point wasn’t that protest voting was good. It was that you could make the exact opposite point (with a lot fewer words) using your exact logic. Which means it’s not a good point.

                  I ask this because you’re trying to make this party thing where I’d title paring [you mean “try paying,” maybe?] attention and reading for context- you’ll see clearly that It’s an ACTION thing.

                  Again, fine, let’s make it an action thing. If the protest voters were so necessary to Harris’ election, why didn’t she take any actions to win them over? That was incredibly irresponsible of her.

                  Are you beginning to see how all your arguments can be flipped just as easily to place the blame on the candidate instead of the voters? Do you think maybe that’s because, even though you’ve convinced yourself that what your saying is cold, hard logic, your actually just screaming your opinions at people?

                  For the record, I voted for Harris out of harm reduction, and I wish she’d won. However, I believe that it is a candidates job to win an election, not the voters job to get them elected. If there was a significant contingent of voters withholding their vote, I think that candidate must have been doing a shitty job.

                  Interesting that you went to progressives so quickly though. Especially since I never even mentioned the word.

                  That says a LOT.

                  Yeah, it says I saw more than 2 minutes of political coverage in 2024, so I knew that Harris wasn’t getting criticism for being too progressive. Grow up.

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh progressives are definitely weak. But numerous. A simple bare minimum vote would have stopped ALL of this from happening.

                  But you couldn’t even do that. So yeah… weak as fuck if you ask me.

                • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yup, it was not lost on me that this was essentially Eco’s 8th feature of fascism. Not that the Democrats are fascists; they don’t match most of the other features, especially 6 (I don’t think it’d ever occurred to them to appeal to anyone’s frustrations), but it seems liberals have at least borrowed this rhetorical attack to punch left.

              • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Progressives could be the largest voting block and most still wouldn’t come out to vote. Why bother trying to gain the vote of a group that has historically low voting. There’s a reason Bernie didn’t win the primary despite massive grass roots movements.

          • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            77 million voted for Trump. 75 million votes for Harris. Just under 3 million voted for a third party candidate of some kind. 90 million didn’t vote but were registered to vote. We don’t know the number of potentially eligible but not registered people there are. The US has an estimated 340 million population. An estimated 260 million are adults.

            Care to shut the fuck up or do you want to say more stupid shit?

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s normal in US elections for less than half the population to vote.

              For local elections it’s less than a fith.

              The protesters were almost all young people 30 and under, which when we look at the numbers, that group didn’t vote any differently than any other election, same as always they don’t vote in any meaningful capacity, so they didn’t effect the election in any meaningful way.

              I would love it if young people voted, but they don’t.

              Care to shut the fuck up or do you want to say more stupid shit? I know you won’t tho, keep convincing yourself of reasons to attack your fellow slaves XD

  • nullptr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    interesting to look from outside, Kamala completely disappeared after losing election, that tells everything about her involvement. Compare that with Le Pen/Mélenchon in France ,who keep trying and trying and trying lol. Well not Le Pen anymore but point stands

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kamala still sends me emails asking for money, I think for the DNC. That is the problem with corporate Democrats, they think resistance looks like fundraising

    • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who voted for her, I’m completely on board with never seeing her or hearing from her again. She utterly failed — lost a (mostly*) free and fair election to a demented fascist idiot who’s destroying the country. Enough of the responsibility for our current situation rests on her shoulders that she can fuck right off forever, along with Biden, the Bushes, the Clintons, Mitch McConnell, Joe Lieberman, Newt Gingrich and all the other neocons, neolibs, and corrupt, amoral, greedy, misanthropic assholes that got us here.

      She might survive as a politician if she took responsibility for the loss, and pushed for change in the Democratic party. Hopefully, she’ll do that, and not follow Clinton’s example. Seems unlikely.

      • There was probably some amount of fuckery, but if the margins were as wide as they should have been, they couldn’t have pulled it off.
  • dota__2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    any even remotely law abiding politician(read american “left” wing) is kinda hamstrung with the current state of affairs.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People get upset when you say standing in a street with a sign won’t do anything, but standing in a street with a sign won’t do anything.

    These guys won’t even do town halls any more. They’re not going to pay attention to paper signs on sticks.

    • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      One person standing on the street obviously doesn’t matter much, but it’s about being the change you’d wish to see. Boycotts don’t really work either. Doesn’t mean you should buy a Tesla.

  • Adubya@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Destroy the country to “own the libs”. What a world and they wanted this so they can make memes instead of trying to do anything.