alt-text

It blows our hivemind that the United States doesn’t use the ISO 216 paper size standard (A4, A5 and the gang).

Like, we consider ourselves worldly people and are aware of America’s little idiosyncrasies like mass incarceration, the widespread availability of assault weapons and not being able to transfer money via your banking app, but come on - look how absolutely great it is to be European:

The American mind cannot comprehend this diagram

[Diagram of paper sizes as listed below]

ISO 216 A series papers formats

AO

A1

A3

A5

A7

A6

Et.

A4

Instead, Americans prostrate themselves to bizarrely-named paper types of seemingly random size: Letter, Legal, Tabloid (Ledger) and all other types of sordid nonsense. We’re not even going to include a picture because this is a family-friendly finance blog.

Source: Financial Times

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, yes we DO use the metric system officially. In the early 1970’s the metric system was made the official standard for weights and measures.

      What we didn’t do was force everyone to use it at 3:11AM 11/21/1974. It was decided to take a longer approach and let the change happen naturally and it has happened.

      Everything in the grocery store is marked with metric weights and volumes. We buy butter by the gram, soda pop by the liter and whisk(e)y buy the milliliter. And everyone is looking for that same missing 10mm socket/wrench. (Where does do those things go anyway?)

      How much more metric do we really need to adopt?

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          cars still measure speed in miles per gallon

          The American system really is something huh

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The gallon of milk makes it incredibly easy to divide it into quarters. That makes it easy to simply double things - 2 pints = 1 quart. 2 quarts = 1/2 gallon. Two 1/2 gallons makes 1 gallon. This dates back to the days when you went to the market and told the seller that you want 1/2 or 1/4 of that container of whatever was in that container. Simple math for simple needs.

          Your 1/4 of a pound of butter or one stick, (again simple divisions for a simple use), is marked with rough marks of tablespoons for cooking if you are using such measurements. But you are quite free to ignore them if you are using a scale. Not really any issue.

          Yes, in the US travel distances are measured in miles. But that slowly becoming meaningless also. People, (no matter the units used to measure the psychical distance), care more about “how long does it take to get there” rather than the actual distance traveled. But, you are free to push a button and switch to kilometers if you choose.

          Measuring height and weight in feet and inches and pounds is pretty much the only thing the medical system uses US Customary for. And I can’t imagine the sheer number of man hours and cost it would take to go back and convert all those medical records to centimeters and kilos. Somethings are just not worth the effort and cost for a minor data point that only matters only as a long term trend. (just like a single blood pressure is a meaningless data point but over a year may reveal a trend or not)

          Each measurement system, US Customary or Metric, has it’s own advantages and disadvantages. To think one is better than the other is a chauvinism based on what you are most familiar with and nothing more.

          • onion@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The gallon of milk makes it incredibly easy to divide it into quarters

            How did you reach the conclusion that liters can’t be halved or quartered? You could call 250ml a ‘quart’ if you wanted to.

            Metric butter also has markings on it.

            Those medical records should be stored digital anyways, and then it’s a matter of a few man hours to tell the computer to convert them.

            Each measurement system, US Customary or Metric, has it’s own advantages and disadvantages.

            Imo metric can do everything US customary can, but not the other way around, because it’s missing the simple conversions. But that’s it. Everything else is same same but different

          • pukeko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, a liter is very close to a quart, so it’s not like we’d be asking people to adjust their mindset completely. And ditching US measures means we could finally, once and for all, dispense with the nonsense of having a dry and a wet “cup” measure.

            As for converting records, well, it would be trivial to display a converted value in whatever EMR system a practice uses while noting the values are converted and allowing display of the uncoverted data for validation. (Which brings us to the EMR discussion.)

      • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There must be some invisible 10mm black hole just vacuuming up all the 10mm sockets and wrenches in the world. I can’t even tell you how many damn 10mm sockets and wrenches I’ve bought and I still only have one of each. Probably none. I haven’t needed to wrench anything in a couple weeks.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was just ONE aspect of the adoption of the metric system. And that was done to make backwards compatibility easier because of long lasting legacy systems. Because some systems, like say plumbing in a home or city, last for a very long time before they get replaced or repaired. New plumbing installations often use Tubing like PEX which is metric. I designed and fabricated a dozen brackets for a US customer over the weekend for delivery today. They were made using millimeters as specified.

        And if you actually pay attention to how the metric systems compares to the US customary, you would see just how closely they are related from the start. Which makes sense since what we call Imperial measurements predate the metric system by several hundred years.

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Letter paper (8.5" x 11" | 215.9mm x 279.4mm) is kinda sorta pretty close to A4 (8.27" x 11.69" | 210mm x 297mm) so without having the two next to each other, it can seem like A4 is just a funny piece of letter, and vice versa. But to answer the actual question, USA and Canada (and apparently thr phillipines???) use the “North American Standard” which is a terrifying mess in comparison to the beauty that is the ISO standard.

      • criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think Mexico too, or at least the paper name is “carta” and “oficio” which would translate to letter and legal (kinda)

        • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US is a former British colony, but it doesn’t stop them from doing whatever the hell they want. Utter lunatics…

          I’m sorry, I still haven’t forgiven them for the whole tea thing…

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbf, I can see the use case for some “non-standard” sizes, like Legal, where having more height to the page without the extra width might be useful for readability of long documents.

        …can’t think of an excuse for the rest, though.

      • constantokra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        11x17 is incredibly common too. Usually it is oriented landscape and z folded to get a large diagram into a document. It’s kind of irritating that the most typical large format size is 24x36, which is a different aspect ratio than 11x17, for a variety of reasons. If you’re designing something you need to know what aspect ratio to design for. Most copiers can do 11x17, and if the standard large format size was 22x34 it would be exceedingly easy for most offices to produce good working copies of large documents. Best compromise I’ve seen is when people put a logo or header on the side that can be omitted when you switch aspect ratios.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have trouble fitting all our freedom on your kooky, internationally-recognized sizes

      Here’s a comparison using the most sensible units possible:

  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not-super-fun fact: an 8.5 x 11 inch paper can be useful if you lack a ruler in an American office & you need to measure an inch or a foot.

    If you fold the paper like in an image I’ll try to attach, the hypotenuse is 12.01 inches.

    Edit: then you fold the 12.01 inch side against the 11 inch side to get a 1.01 inch measurement

    Not exact, but good enough if you need to know your neck size to buy a fancy shirt online - not that I would ever waste my corporation’s time that way!

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this why my printer has wierd size “letter”, that is not sized like letter?

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, US software always defaults to their own non-compliant standards instead of looking at the location and determining the default that way.

      That is why we in Europe and all the other parts of the world get these strange fuzzy prints where the text is almost unreadable, and is cut off on strange parts in the text.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do Euro printers say PC LOAD A4?

    I think they probably do.

    I want to only briefly defend the NA system in terms of naming. I get it, I worked in printing for decades, I know how shitty it all can be. But Letter and Tabloid communicate well for something that is otherwise all the fault of press guys.

    • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes, thats why i always was confused when i heared people online talk about pc load letter.

      i kinda assumed it was just an odd way to refer to paper that some manufacturers used

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, one still could do it like how many countries transitioned to the metric system: slap the traditional names onto things that are actually now defined by the metric system, like how China’s catty, about 0.60478… kg, became 0.5kg. Just slap “Letter” onto A4.

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s going to make some driver developers very upset. And sensors in printer cartridges that can sense both A4 and Letter.

        I say we just balls the whole thing. Screen or pencils.

        • brisk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          For technical purposes that need to handle both you can just disambiguate it with “Letter (new)” and “Letter (work or school)”

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it’s 2024, so they mostly say things like “out of A4 paper - load A4 paper in tray number 3”. But yeah, they used to.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          TBF, I only remember messages about “out of paper” or “all trays are empty”. Why specify paper size if the printer accepts different ones, anyway?

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really think people are too dumb to remember 2 letter codes that are literally printed on everything? Come on man :D

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, A4 yields unwieldy pages that are too long to comfortably read. And when do you ever need the feature to fold an A4 sheet into A5?

    • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you american? If so, the “unwieldy and too long” is probably because you’re not used to it. I’m not used to letter-size and it seems weirdly short and unnecessarily wide but I know it’s because I’m just not used to it.

      • bleistift2@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m German. If the pages are a comfortable size, why does no publisher ever use A5 or A4 paper? To quote an answer I gave to another comment here:

        Let’s check. I grabbed four random German books from my bookshelf. If you’re right, the pages should either be roughly 30cm×21cm (A4) or 15cm×10.5cm (A5).

        Book 1: 18cm × 11.5; book 2: 19cm×12.5cm; book 3: 20.5cm × 12.5cm; book 4: 24cm × 17cm. None of those conform to the standard.

        Another hint that the paper format is weird is that scientific papers on A4 are always either printed in two columns or use the ninths rule for margins, i.e. 1/9 of margin on the inner and upper edges and 2/9 of margin on the outer and bottom edges, essentially throwing away almost half of the page (I’ll admit there are more economic recommendations of 1/11 or 1/13). This is to make the columns narrower to get closer to the target of 60–80 characters per line. Note also that this makes the ‘usable’ area approximately 20cm long, which is much closer to the American’s ‘Legal’ format (216mm).

        • Yamayo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s check. I grabbed four random German books from my bookshelf. If you’re right, the pages should either be roughly 30cm×21cm (A4) or 15cm×10.5cm (A5).

          Book 1: 18cm × 11.5; book 2: 19cm×12.5cm; book 3: 20.5cm × 12.5cm; book 4: 24cm × 17cm. None of those conform to the standard.

          A5 is not 15x10,5

          If A4 is 291x210 then OBVIOUSLY the next one starts with 210: 210x148.

          • bleistift2@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right. Sorry for getting my post-7pm arithmetic skills on you. However, my point still stands. ‘Close’ is not ‘conforming’ to the standard.

        • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          These are very valid arguments that can’t be reduced to a lack of habit. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

    • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And when do you ever need the feature to fold an A4 sheet into A5?

      When you want to read it more comfortably for example.

    • ValiantDust@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do this all the time. I print two pages on one A4 sheet (or rather four, two on each side) and then fold them so they are like a leaflet.

      That’s the main advantage of the system – you don’t have to design things differently depending on how big you want to print them. You can scale the same design to an A6 flyer or an A2 Poster.

    • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      almost all consumer printers are for a4.
      i had (rare) occasions where i wanted to print a picture for an a3 sized frame and was able to glue together two a4 prints.

      also, as far as im aware, books in a4 size actually consist of a3 sheets bound together in the middle. (same with other sized books)

      • bleistift2@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        almost all consumer printers are for a4.

        I never said A4 wasn’t the standard. I said it’s not a good one.

        books in a4 size actually consist of a3 sheets bound together in the middle. (same with other sized books)

        Let’s check. I grabbed four random German books from my bookshelf. If you’re right, the pages should either be roughly 30cm×21cm (A4) or 15cm×10.5cm (A5).

        Book 1: 18cm × 11.5; book 2: 19cm×12.5cm; book 3: 20.5cm × 12.5cm; book 4: 24cm × 17cm. None of those conform to the standard.

    • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where I’m from, it’s super common to print A4 in half size and fold them into a little booklet when you need to distribute a few pages to loads of people

  • probablynaked@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck, that was way more hilarious than a blog post about financial securities messaging ought to have been

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL that there are different standards of paper sizes in other parts of the world. I never encountered this before despite living in Germany for 10 years, probably because the last time I was there was 30 years ago.

  • trolololol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait a second if the bank app can’t transfer money how do they do it? Just barter with guns? Are the bullets like coins?

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wtf?

        Also are banks just dumb or what? Has it crossed their greedy minds that they also can charge to make transfers?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s pictured there is when people use Venmo to pay for something instead of just transferring money between friends. The fee is paid by the seller. Banks already do this for traditional sellers in the US which is why you’ll see signs asking for cash instead of cards.

          And tax evasion. But I don’t care as long as the tamales are good.

          • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do Visa, Mastercard, etc, not charge transaction fees in Europe? The only place I’ve been where there’s no transaction fees paid by the vendor is China.

            • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I owned a business in Europe. My bank charged me a pretty low monthly flat fee for card charges, so I would take cards for any amount.

            • trolololol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m in Australia and it’s a mix. Some places add the surcharge to the bill and can use cc for as low as$1, some don’t and don’t accept payments that’s less than 2 people’s meals ( and also don’t accept split bills).

              But it’s very very hard to find a place that’s cash only. It comes to mind empanadas, so I got a laugh at the other reply about tamales.

    • s_s@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We have a fee-free bank-to-bank transfer system that is based on pre-digital technology that takes 2-3 business days. We often call it “direct deposit” or automated clearing house (ACH). It’s often used for payroll and paying bills.

      Now, we could probably make this payment system instantaneous relatively effortlessly (and thus useful for regular in-store purchases), but the banks lobby against this so they can continue to charge us fees and interest to over-use credit cards. (Interestingly enough, credit and debit cards all use direct deposit on the backend to actual transfer funds between parties).

      This is all fine and dandy for most people because they simply can’t imagine doing things a more consumer-friendly way.

      • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your comment is all true, except - we CAN all imagine it, but as you pointed out, our unchecked hyper capitalism prevents it

      • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have a fee-free bank-to-bank transfer system that is based on pre-digital technology that takes 2-3 business days. We often call it “direct deposit” or automated clearing house (ACH).

        Ah, right, kinda like SEPA Credit Transfer. You do need a persons IBAN which is a bit long, but their name is validated so you usually send it to the right person.

        Now, we could probably make this payment system instantaneous relatively effortlessly

        Ooh, cool, kinda like SEPA Instant Credit Transfer, which transfers money within ten seconds to bank accounts using the above mentioned number.

        This is all fine and dandy for most people because they simply can’t imagine doing things a more consumer-friendly way

        And that’s why, in the Netherlands, Tikkie took the country by storm. It is an app that allows you to use iDEAL (a web-based payment system, soon rolled out in Germany and Belgium as Vero) to send money to friends. Usually takes one pin and three taps to send it, and have it instantly appear on the account of the recipient.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I imagine it has also something to do with safety? Like, if it was instantaneous, that means you can do damage instantaneously, or a hacker might have fewer hurdles to go through.

    • JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, a lot of banking apps can be used to transfer money now, it’s just done through Zelle. We can also do a bank transfer using the routing and account number (at least with my banking app) but that I think takes longer.

        • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assume it’s ACH, I’m at work and my job includes doing ACH work so that just kinda typed out.

          It has me put their routing and account number in, then took anywhere from 5 minutes to a day to clear, p sure that’s ACH

        • twinnie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          3 days? UK here, the other day I transferred money to my wife (different bank) while she was handing her card to the cashier at the supermarket. It took about 1 second.

          Surely there’s some challenger bank letting you do modern stuff?

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah they’re just making shit up, and it’s anti American so Lemmy assumes it’s true.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t sepa the eu system?

        Sorry but bank transfers are not 1st world exclusive, it’s common place in 3rd world as well.

    • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i just assumed people used 3rd party services for ease of use or faster transactions, seems so wild that you’d not be able to send money using your bank to me

      here it takes 1-2 business day for a free wire transfer from one bank account to another, and you can do it in your banking app or on the bank’s website. you just need to authenticate with your online pin code. you can also pay 1€ to get a <24h transfer

      it’s honestly much better than using a third party service, since pretty much everyone has a bank account, and pays using a card tied to that account directly

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk what all this talk is about - we have wire transfers in the US. I don’t need a third party to do it either, it’s exactly as you’ve described, I can do one through the bank’s app or on their website, and it’s free. It’s not as common though since the information required is: Name of the recipient’s account exactly as it is, account #, routing #, and exact name of the bank tied to the routing #. You can save that info though to make it easier to transfer the next time around - it’s very useful for close family and friends.

        • zarenki@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          and it’s free

          This is very uncommon in the US. Most major banks (I’m not aware of any exceptions) charge a fee for each outgoing wire transfer, usually $25-$30. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Chase, and PNC for just a few examples I’m aware of, plus every credit union that has local branches in my area. Some of those banks even add a second fee at the recipient’s side for incoming wire transfer.

          They often encourage customers to rely on third party services like Zelle instead for small transfers to friends and family. Many banks’ sites/apps can also handle transfers between two accounts that both belong to the same bank for free too.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brasil enters the chat

        No fees transfer takes seconds, as long as it’s not international. People use it for buying groceries, clothes or paying for whatever they buy in the middle of the street from other people who are not businesses. Confirmation of payment from receivers end is immediate with a push on your phone.

        All sellers can produce a QR code including receiver address and price to be payed. All bank apps scan and pay seamlessly.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia enters the chat.

          Same. It is done with National Payment System of Cards law, which people usually call “MIR cards”. It started as replacement system for visa and mastercard, but evolved into System of Fast Payments/Transactions.

          You can use it in three ways: enter recepient’s card number, enter recepient’s phone number or use qr code.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Canada we have Interact e-Transfer. Basically all the banks colluded to make a system that allows for instant money transfer between banks using email or phone number as the recipient identifier, along with options for comments and security questions.

        I felt like this was a huge step up compared to all the hoops and third party apps I had to use in Europe.

        • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          huh, yeah, i heard of similar things in the US

          here it seems to be worked out through legislation though, rather than private deals, but that means it’s much slower to get set in place