• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I went to SportsDirect here in Estonia and at the checkout saw “Italian brainrot” trading card game, at that point I knew I no longer want to know what the youth are doing.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have never had a sexual/romantic dream about an acquaintance I was not already sexually involved with. Gory deaths during the Zombie apocalypse though…

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A 5th panel showing both of them standing across from each other wearing those expressions would have been funny.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Agreed!

      At the same time… I remain grateful that I still have enough fading grey matter left such that I can just imagine it in my head, no prob. 😄

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nah, I think if anything this is a variation on the “woman thinks man just wants to have sex, but man is actually thinking about stupid stuff” trope.

      Which, as tropes go, is a pretty fair-handed one.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Isn’t this a criticism of a meme format? I don’t understand how it relates to the comic :(

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The bad aspect the meme format tends to fall into doesn’t happen here, because the woman’s idea isn’t boring, and by being about two individualised characters rather than generic wojaks or whatever it can’t really be interpreted as being about genders in general unless you’re being particularly uncharitable.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            So the joke in the comic is that they each have equally interesting dreams? I don’t think that’s how it works at all. The woman’s dream is only there to highlight how wacky the man’s dream is. Imagine the comic without the third panel and you’ll see it loses a significant amount of punch, but you’re allowed your interpretation.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The joke in the comic is that one person expects one funny thing (sex is funny) but the reality is another funny thing (chicken sharks are funny). So it refers to two funny things, and also does a bait and switch, which is a third funny thing.

              Imagine the comic without the third panel and you’ll see it loses a significant amount of punch

              Delete the punchline and it loses punch, you say!

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                No mention of the dream being funny is made at all.

                Your arguments are in bad faith.

                Edit: 3 is setup, not the punchline. More bad faith.

                • FishFace@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Nope, I honestly believe that there is absolutely nothing problematic about the comic, and that the criticism of the “girls with a time machine” format doesn’t apply. My previous replies are honest accounts how I feel about it.

                  No mention of the dream being funny is made at all.

                  That’s true, but I don’t understand why you’d say it. Certainly, I didn’t claim and don’t claim that it’s “mentioned”, I just claim that it is. Maybe you would wrongly accuse fewer people of bad faith if you explained things a bit more…

            • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Okay, I REALLY did not mean to share this one if it was a sexist comic, so if I screwed up on that, then that’s on me, and… yeah there’s still time to delete it, I think.

              That said, there’s a friggen’ load of cultural context to explain, if one really needs it, if one REALLY wants to dig in to this one.

              Ball’s in your court, @[email protected].

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                What cultural context is that? I’m familiar with several faltastical creatures, but a chicken-legged shark is new.

                It’s not sexist on its own, but it could be read as one example of a sexist trope (girl boring, guy quirky).