• marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      He was at a congressional hearing yesterday. I don’t know the context, I just saw the except where he explain the FBI hiring practices and a senator questioning why there are legal consequences for the animal in cases of bestiality.

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It gets so much worse than any comment can explain but an important detail that has not been brought up here yet is how Patel argued they had to protect individuals on both sides of beastiality. After being asked for clarification on that, he stated that he would not discriminate against his canine officers over that subject.

      The head of the FBI basically admitted to raping canine units in the FBI.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Fucking dogs is inherently non-consensual (no matter how sexy they are) so it’s rape and we don’t usually talk about rapists loving their victims.

            • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              I love that the glib, completely gibberish response was enough to “slam dunk” a reply for crybabies full of cope.

              Don’t get me wrong, I eat meat. But everyone equating beastiality to human rape needs to also own up to the billions I guess they are saying they genocide. Not to mention the farmer-rapists jacking and jilling off the animals for forced breeding.

              • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                sometimes I will have a thought that is technically correct but I will keep it to myself, because sometimes splitting hairs about sex with dogs or similar topics just comes off as real weird

                • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Oh, it’s not the sex with dogs, it’s the watered down use of “rape” to mean everything from someone taking a picture of you in public with your clothes on that you didn’t approve, to seeing an ugly man in a thong, to apparently fucking a dog.

                  I understand that it comes off as weird in this instance. Luckily I’m in a shitposting comm, shitposting with a bunch of wannabe vegans who are cucked by their own pork chops.

        • LwL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Im not vegan either but artificial semination as well asthe process of getting the sperm is imo just as if not more undoubtedly sexual assault.

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    So are we putting Hasan Piker at like 3 or 4 then? And what about Michael Vick? If we’re talking about celebritiea with dog stories.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s… insane levels of cope. If left-leaning people just defend “our” people regardless of facts, we’re just doing what we always criticize of the right.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I used to also think this, but the evidence is rather convincing that he shocked her to try and train her to sit still on a bed in his background for hours. He’s also posted other old clips of mistreating her by pulling on her tail. Imo it’s distracting to talk about this aspect of him when Republicans do so much worse on a large scale. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzPIgPTPuOA&amp%3Bamp%3Bamp%3Bt=71

        If you can find something that refutes it even better, i would accept it.

        I wish we could just settle on a version of the facts that we agree on and just move forward. For me that would be that Hasan Piker does not treat his dog well, but this doesn’t discredit his whole unrelated political views.

    • rosahaj@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m not sure I like the idea of equating public servants (as misleading a term that may be in this case) to celebrities. I’ve never heard of either of these people outside of the realm of politics, and it just seems like that alone shouldn’t qualify them as such.

  • tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Can someone please explain to a non American (there are dozens of us! Dozens!)? I understand the Kash Patel reference but who is the lady on the left (even though judging by her Mar a Lago face she’s on the right too) is and why she hates doggos?

      • P1k1e@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        One “was” head of DHS (Dep. Of Homeland Security) the other “is” head of the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation)

        Edit: can’t spell worth a damn

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Kristi Noem, on the left, is the former Director of Homeland Security. She was behind a lot of the ICE bullshit, and was fired by Trump a few months back. She bragged in her book that she shot and killed her dog because she couldn’t train it.

      Kash Patel, on the left, is the current FBI Director. He’s terrible in every way. But the current news on him is about him changes in the FBI hiring process that include removal of automatic disqualification of those who had previously stolen from their employers or engaged in prostitution or beastiality.

  • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I read somewhere that the same provision that forbade bestiality also disqualifies people who have been found to have paid for sex three or more times in the last ten years. I think that what’s actually happening is that Patel, or a buddy of his, got caught hiring prostitutes a few too many times, and now want to repeal the rule so they don’t get kicked out.

    But someone saw ‘bestiality’ and decided to make it about that to distract people.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Then they could have removed the prostitution clause and kept the bestiality one.
      Also he literally defended removing the latter in front of Congress.

  • temptationscattreats@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Great news for me! I was ready to congratulate all the people I know who have committed acts of bestiality, even set aside a couple hours on my calendar for it. Didn’t need even a moment of that two hour block because I don’t know a single person who’s ever done that sort of thing.

    Now I got two hours to kill and started thinking about something my uncle used to say “I’m fucking this cat, you just hold the tail.” Which was a pretty vulgar thing to say to a 10 year old but also what the fuck Uncle Mike?