• fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m not. I just want to visit to get a break from this bullshit, eat some poutine, and fuck back off to my little corner of this mess.

  • J_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    If the morons come here there are many of us ready to ‘receive’ them. Won’t need too much to prepare because they will bring everything with them that we need. We will make Vietnam look like a volleyball tournament.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The title seems to be generating confusion, but the author’s point is that there are billionaire oligarchs (not just Trump, people whose power is not term-limited) pushing to gain control of Canada’s resources. He’s not talking about ordinary Americans nor is he necessarily talking about an invasion or a war.

    The playbook here is generally to apply economic pressure with the aim of causing political discontent, while at the same time financing an opposition faction that’s more pliable, like they’re doing against Cuba, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m not sure the US, with all their “military might” are actually ready to face a war against a border enemy that’s not an underdeveloped country and that is expert on their own terrain and also very dispersed. You can’t just throw a bomb in Canada and kill thousands because I’m not sure you’ll find a thousand people living close to each other in the first place.

    Meanwhile, if Canada wanted to reply in kind, they’d just need to send a swarm of drones to any close city like New York and cause a massacre. However, I’m pretty sure it won’t be needed because if pedohitler decides to invade Canada, they’d make half of the US side with Canada.

    I don’t want a new war to burst, but hell if I’d not like it to happen and see Magastan get its ass whooped.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Who knew Trump took Canadian Bacon (the movie) so seriously.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    How can anyone take this article seriously after opening with this clear misinterpretation:

    Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated he will return to the bargaining table “when the Americans start being serious.” How much more serious can the Americans be? The Americans have been very serious right from the beginning of Trump’s second term. Trump has constantly repeated 51ST state, governor of Canada statements and now Lake America.

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      as article points out: that one person is supported by a whole class of Americans - the billionaires. And those in turn are supported by not insignificant portion of American population. So plural is very apropos here.

        • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          businesspeople differ from billionaires in that they don’t get to impact policies and they don’t run multinationals milking both sides of the border

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah, there is that legal fiction, and typical way of looking at things, so it’s not an incorrect phrasing. It’s just kinda funny.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            400 million people is 400 million distinct people. Nobody could or does represent them; the idea that someone can represent “the will of the people” is propaganda. Same with every other government; they actually just have control.

            • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              A leader that is elected by their country, represents it. It’s a collective responsibility.

              In Trumps case, he truly represents it, in every way. Selfish, debaucherous, arrogant, can’t take criticism.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                A leader that is elected by their country, represents it. It’s a collective responsibility.

                Well, that’s basically the propaganda. Says who? God? Physics? Neither. And, elect how? Some countries have proportional representation, which neither the US or Canada do.

                At the end of the day, a state is anything that has a monopoly on the use of force. Some allocate political power within themselves through elections (of many massively different kinds), while some do it other ways.

                You could say, “okay, elections have nothing to do with it, but we’re still responsible for what we let our governments do”, and there’s a strong argument for that. But, by that measure pretty much everyone sucks everywhere, which you can take however you want.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    And i am very serious about killing any doodle who sets foot in this country with that intent.

    I don’t care if i die.

    I am not living undet the rule of people who worship curtis yarvin.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      MAGA dipshits severely underestimate how many Canadians would actually enjoy taking a break from the rat race to repel invaders.

      • orioler25@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Are you joking? Most of you couldn’t even fucking handle staying inside and not going to parties when you wanted to. Stop acting like Canadians are hard.

          • codydodd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yupp…

            Act 1 US war of independence founded modern Canada because a) the quebecois ever fearful of cultural erasure, ever relevant today given those US demands, b) those not in favour of a racist dictatorship (yes the anglosphere was turning their backs on a monster they helped create), my family moved to loyalist country, fitting, and c) Britain’s desire to legitimize presence by recognizing first nations,… founded canada. The US invaded thinking we would join but Quebec and the indigenous wanted nothing to do with that genocidal regime. An asymetrical response ended American interests.

            Act 2 The war of 1812, the US claims they kinda won because they genocided the Iroquois nation and paved a way for continental-scale genocide … but another goal was conquest of Canada. A goal they failed on every county…britain, its loyalists, and later founders of Canada fought back and said fuck you. Canada 100% repelled the US invasion using asymmetrical warfare.

            Act 3 Fuck around and find out.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t think you can say that if you’ve never been invaded/occupied by a superior army.

          Maybe come over to vietnam and go to some museums or talk to some people if you want to know what asym warfare is like.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yes, Canadians have no idea what it’s like. We’ve seen even less ugliness than Americans, and when this whole thing started, we had to go to hockey for martial metaphors.

            Living in a warzone is a learning curve you can go up fast, though, because you have no choice.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              I know someone who served in the Canadian Armed Forces and did a tour diffusing IEDs in Afghanistan. I’m pretty sure he knows how to build one if it came to that.

              Americans don’t recognize that Canadians actually did go to Afghanistan. It’s not just Hockey metaphors, people in Canada actually do know the tactics the US military has a difficult time dealing with. That’s because our soldiers had to deal with those same tactics when fighting alongside Americans for two fucking decades. If the US decides to betray Canada they will soon be reminded that Canadians were in Afghanistan and what was learned there.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                Yeah, refugees, combat vets, relief workers and refugees are not included. Even just being from a family with those backgrounds teaches you a bit about how the world really works, when push comes to shove, speaking from experience.

                The average Canadian on the street lacks the experience to understand, though. Even more than that, there’s been a kind of resistance to understanding it, historically, because it’s easier and cleaner not to.

                If OP thinks guerilla warfare is a vacation, they probably don’t know what they don’t know.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            It’s also worth noting that Canada has a land border with the USA. They can also pass as generic American, if required.

            Asymmetric warfare wouldn’t only be focused in Canada. E.g. a coordinated set of drone strikes could basically shatter large portions of the American power grid. There are too many soft, unmanned targets to viably protect, and the lead time of spares is measured in months to years, on some parts.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Do you not remember covid? Your treatlerites rioted in Montréal and tried to do a J6 over the most tepid restrictions. The ones jerking off over a romantic idea of fighting a war aren’t prepared to spend years living without the lifestyle they’re accustomed to and have themselves and their families randomly imprisoned or murdered by the evil empire they’ve served so faithfully. You’d be closer to the conditions of the IRA than Vietnam or Iran, except even they had a history of genocides to radicalize people.

              • cynar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                FYI, I’m not Canadian. Just an observer from the other side of the pond, watching America die in morbid horror.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I wouldn’t. Why conduct the destructive mess that is a war in our own living room?

      I’d contribute to any effort to make long range drones that strike energy and electronic infrastructure deep inside the US instead.

      Keep the destruction over there. Watch American arrogance melt away as they realize that fighting a war isn’t just some thing they send troops elsewhere to die over while they start comfy and safe at home anymore.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        The answer is going to be both.

        Drones are the future of warfare. Ukraine has proven that.

        But if the US decides to invade, it absolutely WILL send troops over the border. And we’ll be there, shooting them down. Carney may have to undo Trudeau’s silly handgun restrictions for us RPAL holders for the good of Canada.

        I’m too old to be a soldier, but I can still hold a rifle. I’m not a violent person, but I will defend my country. I don’t believe that most people in the US support this, but I will shoot to kill any that come across the border with plans to invade.

        In my nearly 60 years on this planet, this is the first time I’ve said I will die defending my country.

        So yes, in a situation of war we support drones. We support attacks deep within US territory, rather than traditional face-to-face combat.

        But we will do whatever it takes to protect our country.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        If you’re in a war, you’re going to get people dying on both sides of the border.

        And it’s going to be hard to procure that many drone parts under occupation, so if that’s your job, you might end up doing car/ATV bombs instead.

      • potter2010@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        If they’re in your living room, they’re in effective control of your area. At that point there will not be long-range drones going (maybe coming in), there will only be direct action by the local populace.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Plenty of Americans are hoping a dumb ass move like that is enough to weaken the morons in charge and join your side.

      Like both coasts and most of the bordering states would have majorities on Canada’s side.

  • remnant2652@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m American (unfortunately) and I want no part in annexing any country. I actually can’t recall anyone else here who does… Well except big orange wrinkly pimples in DC.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Even if we came willingly, the Republicans wouldn’t really want another California.

      Trump doesn’t seem to get that’s what it would be, though. Except also add a raging insurgency, which would most likely spread.

      • sanzky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        in the hypothetical case of an annexation there is no way Canada would get statehood. they would be just another puerto rico

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Depends on the hypothetical, I guess. We’re already handwaving a lot of things.

          Trump is rhetorically pretty specific about it being a new state.