• kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Only a small minority. Private prisons are no doubt a problem, but the vast majority of prisons in the USA are publicly owned

          • Formfiller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            They may be “public “ but they all funnel millions to the Epstein class and corrupt politicians through contracts on everything

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        History shows the pendulum swings both ways. The fast and more violently the swing to the right, well, political physics has some incredible lessons to teach.

  • AreaKode@riskeratspizza.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Elon Musk said he’d end world hunger if that were something that could be done. The United Nations World Food Programme did the math: $6.6 billion per year. That’s it! You can guess how much the world’s richest man has donated toward this cause…

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Last I heard he NEGATED $43.8 Billion dollars of aid by cutting USAID, causing the deaths of 4.5 Million Children around the world.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      How Much Would It Cost to End World Hunger?

      The U.N. World Food Programme feeds over 100 million people facing severe hunger in more than 120 countries and territories every year. In 2021, WFP did this with a budget of $9.6 billion dollars, which was still $5.2 billion dollars short of their total funding requirements. Clearly, ending world hunger will require more money.

      Back in July of 2021, former U.N. World Food Programme Executive Director David Beasley mentioned it would take an estimated $40 billion each year to end world hunger by 2030.

      Edit: I should add, that they should still do it. Split it between the billionaires. Fuck, Elon is worth a trillion dollars

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        That’s still only $360b. We could do that with only a portion of the wealth of ONE MAN.

        • khornechips@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          They don’t have any money, except when they do. They have all kinds of money for stock buybacks and bribes to government officials but when it comes to paying taxes suddenly there’s no liquidity.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Its not merely about money. Ending food scarcity in remote locations is big part of the problem. It’s a transportation issue of goods economically. We need to centralize humanity and not try to deliver food to example tribes in deep Africa. We have the food production and waste a good portion of food that we throw out.

    • BillyClark@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Just for perspective, a person who invested in the stock market recently and got a 5% return would be said to be investing poorly.

      5% may not seem like much, but just for comparison, 5% of a trillion dollars is 50 billion dollars. I think you can see the point. Musk could solve world hunger, and it would be like chump change to him, even if he did fairly poorly with his investments. He wouldn’t even have to touch his savings.

      He’s refusing to help people whose lives are being ruined without that help, or who are dying, even though the only penalty for Musk is that he would be getting inconceivably richer at a slightly slower rate.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s like he’s sitting on a mountain of life preservers amid an ocean of drowning people

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I vibe with it but let’s be accurate here:

    Based on FY 2023 data, the average annual COIF for a Federal inmate housed in a Bureau or non-Bureau facility in FY 2023 was $44,090 ($120.80 per day). The average annual COIF for a Federal inmate housed in a Residential Reentry Center for FY 2023 was $41,437 ($113.53 per day).
    (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2023.)
    James Wills,
    Assistant Director/General Counsel,
    Federal Bureau of Prisons.
    [FR Doc. 2024-28743 Filed: 12/5/2024 8:45 am; Publication Date: 12/6/2024]

    And you may not trust the suit who wrote that but keep in mind if they were corrupt and under-report themselves they’ll basically be robbing themselves on federal contract negotiations in the future but if they were on the straight and narrow then they’re morally obligated to keep the number accurate and as low as possible.

    And the low end is closer to $20,000 while the high end (higher security) was near $75,000 and most interesting of all is that the food and healthcare combined is less than $8,000 but the cost of the institution itself (beds and housing) varies wildly dependent on location as would the amount needed to house people outside of prison, and almost half the cost is paying wages to prison staff including records keeping, attorneys, management, and a metric butt-load of guards.

    So, the system is broken and they’re trying to abuse prison labor to the extreme, especially private sector and this specific administration, but in theory some federal prisons are already approaching the efficiency of the 16k number.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      You’d also have to put a number on the value of prison labor - it’s unethical, but that never stopped the suits.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      actually GOP likely uses things like prison pop as part of the census for thier start, this likely another source too. another value to them, is that news never reports how they bus them to other blue states, so they can give sound bites to right wing media, to say “shithole liberal media cant control thier drug ridden state”.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      -$50,000, if the figures presented are to be believed. I guess that’s what happens when your party is led by a certified business genius. They’re just in it for the love of oppression.

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Nor is the fact mentioned that most prisons in the U.S. are run by and as for-profit private companies.

      That is why so many people are incarcerated in the U.S., and unpaid slave labor is part of this multibillion-dollar business.

      It is a business that, for entirely obvious reasons, no other democracy in the world allows in this absurd form—only the U.S., the “Land of the Free.”

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Most? I’m gonna need a source for that cause unless that’s changed recently, they’ve been mostly public prisons.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          You’re right that only a minority of inmates are held in private facilities:

          In fact, less than 9% of all incarcerated people are held in private prisons; the vast majority are in publicly-owned prisons and jails. Some states have more people in private prisons than others, of course, and the industry has lobbied to maintain high levels of incarceration, but private prisons are essentially a parasite on the massive publicly-owned system — not the root of it. Nevertheless, a range of private industries and even some public agencies continue to profit from mass incarceration. Many city and county jails rent space to other agencies, including state prison systems, the U.S. Marshals Service, and ICE. Private companies are frequently granted contracts to operate prison food and health services (often so bad they result in major lawsuits), and prison and jail telecom and commissary functions have spawned multi-billion dollar private industries. By privatizing services like phone calls, medical care, and commissary, prisons and jails are offloading the costs of incarceration onto incarcerated people and their families, trimming their budgets at an unconscionable social cost.

          Source

          However, this does nothing to make the fact that private individuals profit from the incarceration of people any better. This practice could hardly be more unethical or counterproductive, as it creates a financial incentive to incarcerate as many people as possible—and it is obvious that this runs counter to the social purpose of prisons.

          • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I completely agree with all of that. But I’d also like to point out that the prison system in the US isn’t being run with rehabilitation in mind. Our system is much more about punishment. They’d rather have people stuck in the system because they can be used as slave labor.

            It’s one of the biggest failures of the US IMO and not a lot of people talk about it. Slavery needs to be illegal in all capacities. And prisoners shouldn’t be allowed to be used as labor. In theory I don’t have a problem with it, but in practice it just encourages abuse, as you have pointed out.

    • Kanda@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Move to one of the poorest countries in the world, live in a hut and do nothing except eating. Don’t get bit by wildlife or bugs.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m pretty sure the actual cost is to permanently house and feed them until they can get a job that gets them self sufficient.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s likely a room in a boarding house, and food through a volunteer kitchen - so that $16K is still being subsidised through private charities and/or local + state Government grants.

      Don’t mistake me, though - I’m all for these types of programs. They’re a hell of a lot better than a swathe of people being homeless on the streets, or incarcerated in an overcrowded prison.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        if you take the capitalism out of the housing, and didn’t have a dipshit fucking the global economy and cost to eat. in all but the expensive cities in the u.s., it’s probably not that far off for communities of small flats or tiny homes and community-run kitchens.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        But yeah even if it cost double to house them rather than imprison them it would still be the right and rational thing to do

  • story@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Louisiana was the only state that didn’t secede because of the issue of slavery per se.

    they were afraid that their human breeding programs and slave market/futures market would collapse

    if you go to Walmart, Kroger, or Publix and look up the company that produces those big Dora balloons and other cartoon characters, that’s all Louisiana slave labor.

    the overton window in Louisiana is firmly in the territory of “well you gotta have slaves though” and probably will be like that forever

  • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    They don’t care because the breakdown is:

    The tax-payer is out 66k in order to imprison the homeless That 66k goes to a prison, the prison makes money The imprisoned person is enslaved to prison labor, which the prison then leases out. The prison makes money.

    The prison lobbies politicians to be “tough on crime” and pass laws that criminalize more and more things instead of helping people, that way the prison will make more and more money.

    The people would be happier, healthier, and pay less in taxes if we just helped people, but we never will because helping people doesn’t make prisons money. Same thing for policing. Police, as an institution, did not begin as law enforcement. They began as slave catchers. Their attitude and overall goal has remained the same. The police exist to ticket and fine people wherever possible in order to generate revenue, and, when able, arrest and charge people with the goal of filling prisons with slave labor.

    If you eliminate the part of the 13th amendment that says ‘except as punishment for convicted crime’ and make slave labor illegal period, and in fact, make it illegal for any entity anywhere to profit off of incarcerated persons, you will eliminate a metric shit ton of problems in the U.S.

      • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        What on earth could they possibly be suing for??

        Not that I doubt you, mind, it just sounds incredulous!

          • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Oh, so there’s a contract with the state that says that they’ll keep it at max occupancy. That’s fucked.

            Here’s how I would get around it: We enact the legislation that says that prisons cannot profit off of any labor by incarcerated individuals, nor may their labor be leased, for any reason. Take that revenue away.

            We hold to the occupancy contract, and they can have a prison full of people they have to care for but can’t profit from.

            Then we let the contract end and refuse to sign another one.

            Would that work?

    • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      One tiny note, with markdown formatting, you gotta put two spaces after a line for a newline. But that’s only if you are absolutely absolutely sure, it’s best to use two newlines for a new paragraph. OR make a list by adding the minus sign to the start of each line.