• Sandbar_Trekker@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The dislikes were great at telling me quickly if a tutorial was good or not.

    Now you generally have to check the top comments to see if there’s something wrong about the tutorial, but then YouTube started hiding those comments below ads/recommendations.

    Now I just use GrayJay and I can quickly check comments for any video.

    • laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thnk google being ad company - they do it to increase number of videos advertizers willing to pay for.
      advertisers avoid “negative” content

      whichc ofc sucks for actual users

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already removed it from Shorts. Give it a little time and it will be gone from the rest of the videos.

    • istdaslol@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No the API is dead. The extension everyone is using calculates their own dislike number by inferring from the extension users who disliked the video

        • istdaslol@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Afaik it’s only for the YT-Studio backend, so creators can see the dislikes but there is no public access to that data

            • istdaslol@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I meant that while the button is still there the Data is only available for the uploader via the Studio backend. The public API is dead, wich I omitted in the original comment for simplicity

              • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                How is:

                the Data is only available for the uploader via the Studio backend.

                different from:

                it just doesn’t show numbers because YouTube is a coward.

                ?

                You were more technical than the top level comment and framed it as a disagreement.

                • istdaslol@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Because the second can implies the data is still available but not displayed. I wanted to specify that the data isn’t available (for the public). I don’t disagree with the top per se but wanted to clear up the ambiguity

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why the dislike button is important. Do you feel like you’ve lost agency over the algorithm? Or do you value the opportunity to publicly disapprove?

    Perhaps you trust that a like/dislike ratio is correlated to video quality.

    For my part, like, share, and subscribe are just different buttons in the Skinner box that is algorithmic entertainment. “Engagement” is free labor for to improve algorithms and train “AI”.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s astonishing that you believe you ever had any agency, but thanks for being honest.

        You must understand that your engagement may improve your suggestions but the ultimate beneficiary is a trillion dollar company. The creators have a chance to be compensated for adding value to the platform, but you’re working for, I don’t know, vibes?

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          it’s worse than that, i am a paying customer. i am a triple-a corpo stooge who goes through life without a single thought in my head other than media consumption, leaving not a single spare thought to the late-stage capitalistic oligopoly hellhole we find ourself in and which will inevitably kill us. i would never even think of researching unions, protests, or a proletariat uprising because i’m too busy keeping up with fucking… ice road truckers and whatever.

          there, does that fill my ego-stroking quota for today? then fuck off with that shit, you’re just stating the obvious as if it’s revolutionary insight and derailing the conversation.

    • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      When I search the internet on how to do something I often prefer to read how it is done. In this day and age with google, reddit, Facebook and discord hiding guides behind walled gardens you have to sign up for. Also dont get me started on asking AI step by step directions on how to do something. Often times the only half descent guides are on YouTube but the number of shit clickbait guides makes finding the one you need a giant pain. The number of completely silent videos I’ve watched thinking I’ll see how to do the thing I want is to damb high.

      With dislikes I can instantly see not worth my time.

      Edit as an example: My I suggest looking up how to replace the headlight bulb in your car if you own one. Bonus points if its made after 2020.

    • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The opportunity to publicly disapprove is a weird way to write warning others that this content is shit/false/malicious etc.

    • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d like to give more feedback for the algorithm. The long press and selecting that you dislike this video feels like overkill.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gotta say, don’t miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels

      • banazir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Perfectly true. It would’ve been nice, if it wasn’t so inherently abusable. We can’t have nice things.

        • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Could imagine that working at the scale where PeerTube is currently at, where you can actually get to know folks and it’s not just about broadcasting to as many people as possible…

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Only because Google actually worked as advertised (and only as advertised). Compared to what Google is now, that’s a matter of opinion.

            All things considered, I’ll take the Google of yesteryear over the Google of today. I’ll also take a more privative and much goofier/glitchier YouTube.

            Shit, I remember when having a Gmail account was a coveted thing that required an invite that people paid literally hundreds, even thousands of dollars for. I had five, and I sold one for $2k, and another for $4k. (These people were total twats). Decades later, I still use my [email protected] addy, while one is dead, and the other got married 2 months later and changed their name anyway. Idiots, lol. Weeks later, invite Scott bumped up to 50, then 250, then unlimited, then it got opened to the public.

            Being impatient is expensive.

            Grad school was a crazy time

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And the video’s rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.

      The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn’t be such a problem today if we still had that.

      • cRazi_man@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.

        Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.

        • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.

          However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn’t ask for.

          A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.

        • alpine_jim@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          extensive use of the “Don’t recommend this video > Tell us why > I don’t like this video” function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.

          • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah it can definitely be somewhat trained. Also the extention dearrow makes a big difference in the experience too.

    • Zarobi@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Makes me wonder if under the hood it’s still stored as stars or if they migrated their data. Is a 3 star or more rating displayed as thumbs up now? Is a thumbs up just a 5 star rating? When thumbs down existed was that just 1 star?

    • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which I really hate, because it means when you get into some specific interest, YouTube basically stops showing you anything else.

          Hey YouTube! Those interests I was into last week, last month, I’m still into them! Please don’t railroad me like that!

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.

        It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.

        Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…

        I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe when the AI bubble bursts, people will buy up abandoned data centers for pennies on the dollar and repurpose them for a better Youtube alternative. And maybe Margot Robbie will see this comment and fall in love with me.

          • banazir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            People really fail to understand what a colossal undertaking a site like YouTube really is. It’s a technological wonder that they are able to process that much data and serve it so efficiently. Hate YouTube all you want, I do, but the engineers at Google are fucking magicians.

            • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Last I heard it was something on the order of 700 hours of video content uploaded per minute. Insane.

  • Iunnrais@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I seem to recall that people found that the like and dislike buttons equally improved the video’s visibility in the algorithm, causing many youtubers to genuinely suggest disliking the video as their call to action.

    • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s more of an issue with their algorithm. The thing I think most people here (myself included) miss is that they used to let you know the rating on videos before you clicked them so you could see whether a given video was decent or not and therefore whether or not you should bother with some clickbait BS or not

  • Dookieman12@piefed.socialBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    We’re all being punished because Google’s feelings got hurt when we didn’t like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.