(original photo removed.)

    • kcSeb - they/them@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m a bit stoned, so that might play a factor but… I’ve just sat there staring at those statistics and graphs in awe for a solid 10 minutes. Thanks for this!

    • Aeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why the fuck did they add an AI slop explanation and image to each graph lol

            • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The biggest giveaways are the weirdly pixelated faces (used to hide obvious AI elements) the awkward pose, the way the plaid pattern on the left side (his right arm, just before the white sleeve) merges together, the lack of any other version of this image existing (which is common for photo shopped images) and that when this is run through AI detection software it is flagged as such.

              • cameron_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m pretty sure this image is not AI because of the background composition. While I agree the pattern on the right arm looks a little weird, that alone doesn’t proof it’s AI. It could be edited using AI but might just be photoshopped. Also you shouldn’t trust AI detection software, it doesn’t work.

      • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know that it’s AI, but the graph is obviously drawn over the picture. I think the original was just making of the professor for wearing a t-shirt over a flannel shirt

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even though you could argue the graphs are right, that still does not mean the variables are related in some way.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    smoking withdrawal and not letting the expletives flow together with therapy mandated to deflect social responsibility for your problems increases the frequency of those flying off the handle. Vidya game complexity increases from pong could be a factor too. :P

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    this image is photoshopped. i can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.

    • nailingjello@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. The image is fake, but the graph by itself is an excellent example that correlation does not equal causation.

  • Kwiila@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a round about way of expressing that correlation does not imply causation. It was done so that everytime someone shares this meme of a guy wearing a T-shirt over his flannel, someone in the audience can explain that the graphs intentionally represent a fallacy.

  • Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I had the post loaded earlier from scrolling on the toilet and now that I’m scrolling on the toilet again the post has been removed but I have the original photo in my feed still so here it is if you are confused, without the dude’s face

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      only 7 years to save for a house? well maybe i guess if you don’t have major emergencies. i’m going to go laugh madly in the corner now.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s not about fiat currency, it’s about the changes to the economy caused by the rise of MBAs and business executives who had different ideas about the way business should use profits (stock buybacks and hiring bureaucrats rather than raises and expansion) and what a company should do (make money rather than provide goods and services at a profit). Read some Graeber to understand more. All this was part of the beginnings of neoliberalism which is the actual problem here, and the end of countries following Keynesian economic policies. And in the US the weakening of unions and the new deal also played a role.

      Well at least that’s the case for the economic graphs there. Things like single motherhood and higher divorce rates stem from feminism winning the right to no fault divorce and the ability for a single mother to be less trapped into a relationship she doesn’t want. Several of these graphs stem from social changes in the late 20th century.

      There were a lot of economic issues under metallic currency including somewhat frequent panics and crashes.

  • anugeshtu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait, did you know that there’s a direct correlation between the decline of Spirograph and the rise in gang activity?

  • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I believe the correct answer to OPs question is "an object lesson in the difference between correlation and causality.

    Or proof he doesn’t understand that difference, whichever applies.