I’d like it better if its entire existence couldn’t literally be a prop in a dystopia novel. Ruthlessly exploiting malnourished cows and their calves, watered down to pad profits, jugged in plastic, extorting ungodly amounts of land and water resources, sold by a corporation that has a bigger bottom line than most sovereign nations, sold to the impoverished and brainwashed masses that fuel the very destruction of the only planet we fucking have.
That, and it’s 2%. Whole milk or no milk, and I will die on that hill.
i am reminded of a factoid i learned like 20 years ago. there is an amount of blood and pus the FDA says is okay to exist in one of these things and its not zero.
Thats one of those “factoids” that came from PETA during one of their milk = rape campaigns. Usually plastered on a picture of a jug of bloody, nasty milk for maximum shock value.
Milk from injured teats or sick cows is dumped.
This is not a “factoid” but a fact you can look up yourself from many non-animal rights sources (even if there are many reliable ones).
Look up “somatic cell count” on Wikipedia. Food safety regulations around the world define a number of somatic cells (which is what pus is made of). Same for blood cells.
If you bothered to look up what a Sematic cell was, You wouldnt be sitting here posting PETA ignorance.
You are literally made up of somatic cells. They make your organs, your skin, your bones, your blood, everything. They are not the big bag boogyman you’ve been propagandized into thinking.
I’m not saying the somatic cells in commercial milk are harmful, that’s precisely why somatic cell counts need to exist.
Your response comment seemed to suggest that the claim that the FDA has a somatic and blood cell count is “PETA propaganda”, which it is not. I didn’t post “PETA ignorance”, just facts you can look up from objective sources.
amazing how quickly the tune changes once someone sees through the bullshit.
first you present them as basically pus cells, and now “oh i’m not saying its bad”
Just ignorant fear mongering over nothing.
The original claim was “there is an amount of pus and blood allowed in milk and it’s not zero”. To which you said it wasn’t true (“factoid”). So it was necessary to say that pus is made of somatic cells to explain that the claim is in fact true.
I’m not fear mongering, on the contrary my point is that people should look stuff up before dismissing something as PETA bullshit or whatever.
So it was necessary to say that pus is made of somatic cells to explain that the claim is in fact true.
And so is liver, and intestine, and heart, and skin, and lungs, and bones, and blood, and most everything else in a living creatures body.
You are trying to hide behind a technically because you know the whole “MILK IS FULL OF PUS AND BLOOD” is bullshit. So you keep dancing around the edges, saying somatic cells are pus cells, saying pus is made of somatic cells, trying to trigger a revulsion in the ignorant who don’t know what they even are.
You are trying to do the whole " All people who consume Dihydrogen Monoxide eventually die, highlighting its toxicity" type spiel. Taking a hint of truth, and twisting it out of proportion into something completely ridiculous and unrealistic.
Also milk = rape is totally factual (though a terrible way to try to reach the public)
- Bulls are immobilized and forcibly masturbated in order to get sperm.
- Cows are then forcibly inseminated to be pregnant back to back during their lives so they produce milk. This also typically involves restraining the cow in some chute and shoving an arm up the her ass to hold the cervix in place during the process.
So if you believe that non-human animals can be SA’d the dairy industry most likely covers that definition.
You can look this stuff up yourself in industry sources, it’s just industry practice including free-range cows.
*Commercial milk, local farms with humane practices still exist and the milk tends to taste like real milk too, not the sour pus stuff most Americans are familiar with.
That isn’t true, if you regularly milk a cow there is no reason to impregnate it again. The cow will continue producing milk as long as it’s regularly milked. It’s the same as human woman, that’s how you end up with some mothers breastfeeding for a creepily long time. Our own species behaves in the same exact way, why does this continue to get repeated.
Just one glass gives me a full days worth of vitamin R!
You need to post a link for that. The image doesn’t help anyone
I agree but it is fun to see the shitposting
I was very sad when I accidentally spilled it.
No crying!
Can we get a bigger image of the milk? I can’t masturbate to this low quality milk.
Not with that attitude, buster
This image makes me cry…
Don’t cry over spilled milk.
0/10 didn’t even get to taste it.
You can lick it up.
Competition is the catalyst of innovation. Keep going, and you can make better-quality milk to sell.
My MILK brings all the MILK to the yard, damn right, its better than MILK
It’s great for washing down that Walmart Fent-On-The-Bottom yogurt.
Not cowgirl breast milk, very disappointing
Where may I purchase cowgirl breast milk? Is it free range?
Not sure but I’d like to know too
Aged like wine
I don’t know what wine you’re drinking, but may I try a little bit?
I understand why my dad never came back. 5 out of 5.
I also understand why your dad never came back. 5.1 out of 5
I pour the milk first.
0/10 not in a carton
0/10 not femboy milk :(
I SHIT MY PANTS!!! Definitely contains lactose. 10/10
Yikes, cow’s milk?
