• Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I remember listening to a discussion about how the advent of farming enabled the feeding (at least to a survivable level) of large groups of those loyal to the holder. This enabled militaries, which enabled military expansion, which snowballed into everything else. Refusing the farming means refusing a military, which leaves you defenseless against those who use it. Farming is a weapon.

  • gnu@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The hunter gatherer lifestyle works nicely until you get injured, have teeth problems, get sick, or get pregnant. It also helps to be male and both physically and mentally able, so if you aren’t good luck with that.

    As someone who’s had wisdom teeth issues I’m quite happy to have modern medicine rather than being in the stone age and just having to deal with a broken tooth section rubbing against a nerve…

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dental health of hunter gathers looks like it was much better than ours:

      “Hunter-gatherers had really good teeth,” says Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA. “[But] as soon as you get to farming populations, you see this massive change. Huge amounts of gum disease. And cavities start cropping up.”

      Additionally, they had better spacing due to eating tougher foods like high fiber items and tendons. So there’s less dental impacting like we have with wisdom teeth.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah things didn’t really get better until Modern Dentistry so it took several thousand years to get better than hunter-gatherer level

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I went to eating like the great plains American first people about 2 years ago and haven’t brushed my teeth since

        About three months ago I had a dentist clean the plaques off my teeth and check them, to ensure I wasn’t too misguided and my teeth had no new damage

        The ancient people with great teeth also had bigger heads and bigger jaws. They could fit wisdom teeth

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Beef, since cattle are the main product of my region. The native Americans ate bison

            For dental health the best is no carbohydrates, few acids

            Human skeletons don’t show dental damage until the rise of agriculture, especially bread

            I note that allergies prevent me from adding vegetables - I can’t be healthy if I eat tannins or oxalates, many others can tolerate both of those

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                I cook it very lightly – bleu at a restaurant is cooked more than I do at home – as heat destroys the little bit of vitamin C in meat and eat about 1 to 2 kilos a day of the fattiest meat I can buy. I cut my own steaks from a bulk pack, and each weighs between 600g and 800. I could easily win a steak house “eat our giant steak and get free dinner” contest if they still ran them

                It averages out to about 1.5kg (call it 3lb) a day

                The Lemmy community is Friendly Carnivore

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        While true, they exist today, and have a life expectancy of like 30. So mostly they just die before their teeth decay.

        https://medium.com/@kennamai/the-truth-of-hunter-gatherers-the-healthiest-but-lower-life-expectancy-why-5bb2f149e165

        33% of children die by the age of 15.

        There is of course merit to us having active lifestyles, controlling calorie intake, and balancing our diets, but that’s in addition to the fact that we live almost 3x as long as we used to due to modern medicine, so we should continue to follow modern medicine, science, and nutrition.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Nothing in this article addressed tooth decay or dental formation issues.

          Also from the article:

          Hunter-gatherers who live until the age of 15 typically experience a lifespan of around 72 years. Among elderly hunter-gatherers, the incidence of diseases such as cancer and high blood pressure is very low. When recalculating the average lifespan excluding child mortality, the average lifespan for hunter-gatherers ranges from 68 to 78 years.

          I also never said we shouldn’t follow science or modern medicine.

    • celeste@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Actually patriarchy only came with settling down. They actually had gender equality, which is pretty cool!

    • Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I’ve had enough medical issues that I’m grateful for modern medicine too. That being said, it could be conceivable to move to more of a hunter-gatherer model of living with modern necessities. It would certainly be interesting to see what that might look like on a societal scale.

  • will@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know this is mostly a joke, but for anyone interested in this sort of thing I highly recommend you check out The Dawn of Everything, which goes into exhaustive detail about how in some places cities existed before agriculture, and in others agriculture existed for a long while without cities. (And by “check out” I mean prepare to devote long nights to reading with a million Wikipedia tabs open)

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I read through the summary, and it sounds a lot like how evolutionary development is perceived by the layperson vs. how complex it really is, including the deception that we are at some high point. So the next question in my mind, and based on the summary the authors left to explore as the answer is probably a difficult one to find - are there paths that could have been traveled which didn’t lead to similar messes like we find ourselves in? One assumption is always that capitalism and consumption and all that comes with them is inevitable. Maybe not? It would ruin this meme that I found very fitting for society, but that’s again based on an inevitable conclusion to be true.

      • will@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        The premise is that humanity has had 10,000+ years to experiment with different ways of living on all corners of the Earth, so it’s ridiculous to say that the modern system that we’ve evolved with division of labor and accumulated wealth is the only possible way (or the inevitable way) - which was kinda the premise of Sapiens. And then they back it up with a ton of modern archaeological evidence. It’s a little dry and admittedly academic, but really compelling once you dig into it.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The ancient Greeks remembered their hunter gatherer tribal ancestors as living in a golden age, when everyone was equal and the gods walked among men

    • Tupper@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Came to share the same text. It adds a needed level of complexity to this joke and has some incredibly eye opening connections between historical events. The world would be a better place if everyone read this book

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    But I like my tech. I just wish it didn’t spy on me, and that we had better batteries for solar so that I can use my stuff guilt-free

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s possible to have great tech without the spying, but it takes a lot of understanding of and ability with computer technology

      We have pretty good batteries. I have modelled solar on my house (based on records of the 2011 solar array I have), with 15kW of solar panels and many loads (especially HVAC, water heating, car charging) being done in daylight hours I would only need about 10kWh of battery, but 30kWh would be better for a bit of really bad weather tolerance

      The main job of a battery is to provide power between dusk and dawn and to buffer power spikes (like air con starting up) from the solar power, and batteries are well up to doing that

      For reference my normal night time power usage is 6kWh in winter, less when the days are longer

      Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries are safe and aren’t degraded by being charged and discharged daily. Near future battery technologies are less high performing, but are non polluting

    • Buttermilk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right tech is rad, just sucks that absolute grosses of people get to decide how all of it works and what it’s used for.