I’m not the one sending billions in weapons to support the genocide and then telling voters “other guy worse” to justify it. You obviously think the democratic party strategy which so severely lost them the election is a brilliant strategy, so this discussion will obviously go nowhere. Have fun posting your memes about burning houses while defending arsonists (instead of being open to the suggestion of perhaps not doing arson) and feeling morally superior because the other party has more destructive arsonists.
I’m not the one sending billions in weapons to support the genocide and then telling voters “other guy worse” to justify it.
No, instead, you’re the one enabling the candidate to support the genocide with billions more and then telling prospective voters “More genocide and less genocide are exactly the same.”
You still don’t take fascism seriously, because this was never a threat to you. Politics is more than a game online for some of us. But what should I expect from someone who plays apologist for Muslim-American Trump voters?
I’m not the one sending billions in weapons to support the genocide and then telling voters “other guy worse” to justify it. You obviously think the democratic party strategy which so severely lost them the election is a brilliant strategy, so this discussion will obviously go nowhere. Have fun posting your memes about burning houses while defending arsonists (instead of being open to the suggestion of perhaps not doing arson) and feeling morally superior because the other party has more destructive arsonists.
No, instead, you’re the one enabling the candidate to support the genocide with billions more and then telling prospective voters “More genocide and less genocide are exactly the same.”
You still don’t take fascism seriously, because this was never a threat to you. Politics is more than a game online for some of us. But what should I expect from someone who plays apologist for Muslim-American Trump voters?
You’re bringing the genocide here.