• MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am convinced that if Kamala won Trump would have started an armed insurgency. Well, this would definitely about do it.

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A couple of questions (from someone not from US):

    • Can’t he just presidential pardon himself?

    • Even if put in jail, can he continue to act as a president? Like, give out orders, hold meetings, etc?

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the first question, there’s a distinction between state and federal crimes, things like shoplifting are usually state level crimes, if you do something like counterfeiting or crossing state lines while doing a criminal activity that’s often federal. The president can only pardon federal crimes, they can’t pardon a state crime (a year or two ago Biden pardoned federal weed offenses but that affected almost nobody because most people jailed for weed are at the state level which he couldn’t pardon). Trump’s charges in New York are state level and he can’t pardon those.

      Whether or not Trump can pardon himself for federal offenses (like the case in Florida that’s been killed by that Trump-appointed judge) is yet untested (Nixon resigned and was pardoned by his successor to avoid this exact question), and it’d likely go to the Supreme Court… so they’d probably let him pardon himself.

      I’m going to pass on the second question because I think he could actually be president from jail but I don’t know for sure. I’m not a lawyer, lol. Didn’t legal eagle do some videos about this?

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He can only pardon federal crimes, and the state of New York obviously can only prosecute state crimes

      I think he can operate as president from jail.

  • _lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they’re elected. Don’t you?” “Why?” “It saves time.” -Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Younger generally means more hopeful and ambitious, so it really depends how much Peter Thiel has his hooks in him.

        Vance at least has a non-white wife and is still on his first marriage so probably less bitter.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          As an aside I was looking up everyone involved with founding PayPal. What a collective bunch of shit stains they are.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seriously if folks knew what would happen with most of em back in the 90s im pretty some of the real old Rednecks wouldve killed em. Im talking the remains of those who fought in the county and union wars BTW.

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah he’s a slightly more knowledgeable clown who is even more eager to do what the money backers want

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m from Germany, so my exposure to US politics is limited (yet still way too much). So, I happened to watch/listen to the new york times podcast interview with vance about 1-2 weeks before the election. Mind you, before that I assumed he was an awkward idiot because all I knew about him was the doughnut thing, laughing at his own joke, and the couch thing. So I basically only tuned in to hear that weird ass man speak for once.

        Apart from the shitty interviewer, I was shocked to find that he would charm me every couple of minutes. Saying people change their minds, people make mistakes, explaining where he is coming from, talking about his wife. This was not who I expected. And I had to remind myself a couple of times: this dude is up to no good. Listen to what he is not saying. Don’t get sucked into this madness.

        But damn he sounded so normal. So human. (Especially in contrast to the stuff I heard about him before.) And since then, I am honestly worried about this guy. I am definitely on the left spectrum politically speaking, and I still found some stuff relatable just by the way he talked. This scared me so much.

        So I agree with you, I think he is an opportunist. And he actually knows what he is doing. I think he knows how to act and speak much better than the left US media tried to portray. They try to ridicule someone who is a very elaborate politician, and this can backfire so much, it’s dangerous. Don’t ridicule the devil in power. I believe if he wanted to, he could wrap a lot of people around his finger.

        • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you look at the election prediction history graph on Nate Silver’s substack, you see an upwards trajectory for Trump/Vance ever since the vice-presidential debate. That was also when the “Republicans are weird” narrative that was working so well for Harris/Walz abruptly left the discourse. And I believe that what happened was that Republicans who were embarrassed by Vance as well as Trump had a moment like you describe where he suddenly didn’t seem so unrelatable and that right there sunk the Dems… as much as it pains me to admit it, because I’d much rather have a party that wins on the issues and communicates clearly how insane and risky it was to vote for literal autocracy, the Harris campaign probably made the wrong choice with Walz and never should have stopped mocking Republicans for being “weird.”

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Theoretically there’s nothing stopping Trump from being president from prison.

      There’s no rule that says a dog can’t play basketball.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably worse because he’s who nazis have to fall in line behind now, and he’s a perfectly soulless puppet who will do whatever he’s told. He’ll make the nazis more efficient.

      Trump’s inherent incompetence works in favor of Americans here. Not by enough, but it’s something.

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    To do so would subvert the will of democracy. I thought liberals were the defenders of democracy? You lost the election. You fucking lost, move forward and try again in 4 years. Stop acting like spoiled entitled children.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah fucking right. Jesus Christ. We need to just accept that it’s over. He’s never going to face any consequences and NY is not sending anyone to the White House to drag him out…

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know how I know this is bullshit? Because even if Trump got the maximum sentence for each of his felony counts, which is three years of prison, they can all be served concurrently, so he would be out by November 2027 with more than a year left of his term.

    If Judge Merchan proceeds with sentencing, Trump’s legal team will just appeal and push it back until after Jan 20th.

    Nice wishful thinking, but Trump winning erased the chances of him ever being held accountable for his crimes against the American people. A majority of Americans felt like he should get away with all of it. On day one he will appoint a sycophant to the DOJ who will drop all of his federal cases, and the state cases will get paused because the President is immune from state prosecution while on office.

    If anybody here wanted to see justice done, you should have shown up on the 5th.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      so he would be out by November 2027 with more than a year left of his term

      In the extremely unlikely event he was sent to prison for 3 years then Vance would immediately use it as an excuse to invoke the section 4 of the 25th and make himself president.

      Then we’d have a reasonably competent person in the white house delivering Project 2025 instead of the incompetent asshole

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he’s not convicted of anything he can’t pardon himself. Is there a statute of limitations on inciting an insurrection, or whatever ge was going to be charged with? Just pick up the case again in Jan 2025.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He won’t have to. He’ll just have his own DOJ appointee dismiss the federal cases against him. This will 100% happen on day one of his presidency. I have no doubt in my mind that he already has a person in mind for it and they will be his first appointment after his swearing in.

        For the state cases, he doesn’t need to do anything, they won’t result in a sentencing verdict that can’t be appealed before he takes office, and the state courts cannot prosecute a sitting president.

        The best case scenario is that the state cases that he can neither dismiss nor pardon himself for will resumed at the end of his term in January 2029. That’s a long fucking time to wait for justice, and even then, we won’t know if he will even serve time for it. The presiding judges could die or retire and sympathetic judges could be appointed in the meantime. The states could flip to be controlled by MAGA AGs and decide to drop the cases even while they are paused.

        The likelihood of this guy seeing the inside of a jail cell before he dies is almost 0%.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, I meant 2029 instead of 2025. I know it’s a long time but I was hoping that without an actual verdict the case could be brought up again when (if) the criminals no longer run the justice system. I know some cases are dismissed with and without prejudice, so if there’s any way they can officially be legally/permanently dispensed with I know he’ll do it.

          I guess the best we can hope for is for him to just die soon. Just keep on eating those hamberders

    • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      crimes against the American people people of New York.

      FTFY

      Don’t know if you’ve ever been to NY, but they literally hate anyone that isn’t from NY. They used to LOVE Trump and his business practices. Call them shady if you want, but that used to bring in money for NY. Then he started making money in Florida and ran as a Republican. That pissed them off but good!

      They aren’t doing this for the American people. They are doing this for themselves.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The hush money payments are not the only things he was being prosecuted for. Jan 6th, the Georgia RICO case, the classified documents case, etc. New York is not the only state that deserves justice.

      • SleepyBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump is and has always been a criminal. New York (my home state) just has the balls to actually bring him to court even if he slimes his way out of any real consequence. And believe it or not we dont hate outsiders. Just shady businessmen and people who dont pay their bills.

  • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This country will never, ever prosecute a president because it would set a precedent of holding our politicians accountable. Ain’t happening. We’ve all been watching Pelosi do insider trading for decades.

    • Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Insider trading is actually legal for congress though. You’re point is valid for systemic issues but this specific one boils down to the individuals involved. There is no precedent for this, no one can really say the judge did anything improper. It would likely be a boon for the governor in a blue state and who knows the DA ambitions.

      I’m mostly making counterpoints than a prediction though. I still don’t think anything major will happen.

    • Nick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except he’s already been prosecuted and found guilty. This is the sentencing. Now the question is will New York state sentence and imprison him before he takes office.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s gonna be interesting because we are clearly at a level of manipulation where the sheer act of being held accountable will 100% be called persecution. From here on out any attempt to hold a politician accountable will be met with resistance and end up being theatre.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s just not going to show up and will stay in FL till after inauguration. If you think they’re going to hold politicians to the same standard as you and me you’re incredibly naïve.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Politicians doing insider trading is not limited to Pelosi, and somehow not illegal. At least Congress has more ethics standards than courts, but it’s an extremely low bar and unreasonable to be held to such lower standard than the rest of us

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “somehow” isn’t a big leap… The people who would have to outlaw it are the exact ones benefitting from the broken status quo, same as it ever was.

    • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the second most pressing concern in everyone’s lives after a second Trump term—Nancy Pelosi’s husband

      • brown567@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m concerned about Pelosi’s husband! Didn’t he get attacked by a dude with a hammer? I wouldn’t wish that on anyone

        • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, you drew the comparison. The whole world of corrupt US politicians to choose from. Don’t like the conclusion people draw when they read exactly what you’ve written? Just write something else lol

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As reprehensible as it is morally, Congresscritters can STILL legally trade based on their insider info they get from their Congresscritter jobs. So there’s really no crime to prosecute. There SHIOULD be, but there isn’t.

  • freewheel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Legal eagle on YouTube and nebula has a recent video on this very subject. Short form? It’s over.