• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    “He didn’t elaborate on what would be ‘nasty.’”

    Bullies usually don’t elaborate. Being vague lets you fill in your own demons, which is more frightening.

    Also plausible deniability when the thugs he’s whistling to go out and bash gays or blacks or Mexicans or whoever (athough in their minds he was giving them permission). “I never said go bash heads. No, I meant nasty as in peacefully, as in not sugarcoating the hard truth, which can be nasty.”

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    For a non-American this thread and other like this are hilarious: the people who spent the last year campaigning “Vote Not Trump” now blame everybody else but themselves for how their strategy of having a candidate who did nothing to appeal to voters and sold fear of the other instead, failed miserably.

    So they post tons of such “it’s the fault of everybody else” memes as topics were they and other members of the tribe make posts with wild ass reasons for why it really is everybody else’s faults and responding to such posts from others by basically saying “yeah, you’re so right”, like one gigantic circle jerk, pretty much a continuation of what they were doing for a whole fucking year - a big fat circle jerk whilst not paying attention to anybody else - only now they’re doing it with sad faces.

    Sure, it’s the 14 millions who stayed home that are to blame, not the massive incompetence of the DNC and the mindless tribalist muppets trading dumb Trump and Vance memes whilst thinking that their “leaders” deserved a win merelly for wearing the right pin on their jacket and not being Trump, without needing to actually have policies that appealed to their natural voters.

    “Bloody natural Democrat voters, not going to polls and doing what they’re supposed to do!”

    What a heady, heady mix of stupidity and sense of entitlement.

    Reminds me of the whole saying: “Only two things are infinite - the Universe and Human Stupidity - and we’re not sure about the first”

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t mind progressives staying home in 2016 to send the message to the DNC that a more progressive candidate was needed.

    What I have a problem with is those same progressives showing up for Biden in record numbers in 2020, which sends a conflicting message to the DNC that you do need to put up a white moderate against Trump, and then staying home in 2024 when another moderate is on the ticket.

    I hear you Bernie bros, I wish Bernie had been on the ticket in 2016 as well, but we’ll never know whether he would have beat Trump in the general. I would have rather given Trump four more years in 2020, then have to still deal with him now.

    Now it’s both totally unclear whether a progressive candidate could actually win in the general, and we have to deal with Trump until 2028. If the Democrats put up a progressive candidate like an AOC for 2028 and still lose… Then we’re completely fucked and would have to swing moderate again in 2032… would progressives still stay home out of protest if it’s shown that progressive policies are unpopular in the general election? Or would progressives finally agree to get behind a moderate candidate?

    To be clear, I hope the Democratic primaries for 2028 do yield a more progressive candidate, and that they do win the general, but this is a really dangerous gamble. I hope the nation, world and vulnerable groups can hang on while we see if it will pay off.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not sure if this is legit but a coworker said 20 million Democrats didn’t vote. That’s depressing knowing if they had voted Dem, Kamala most likely would’ve won.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s close to that. Another metric is 15 million fewer people voted Kamala than Biden last election. Trumps numbers stayed the same.

      15 million people just fucking gave up.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Trump’s numbers didn’t stay the same. Despite winning the popular vote, Donald trump had 2 million less voters than in 2020. That’s a hefty chunk.

        It just doesn’t matter, because 15 million other voters also didn’t show up.

        • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Okay, sure, so that defines that there was overall voter apathy. So Harris lost 85% of the voters who didn’t bother showing up. That’s even more damning.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Everyone in north Gaza will be dead by new years because of the intentional famine. And it will happen completely under Biden without Trump even getting to the White House.

        The community is literally dying and all you can do is throw insults.

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            The UN isn’t lying when they said north Gaza has had no food delivered for weeks and the IDF isn’t lying when they said anyone left alive there who didn’t evacuate is an enemy combatant. The “Generals strategy” is playing out in Israel.

            We’re all pissed that Trump won but don’t take it out on others who are also suffering alongside you.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If Kamala lost the election because she wasn’t in support of Palestine then why didn’t she just support Palestine?

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe make your one issue election about your country and not others? And I mean if you really cared about Palestine, you wouldn’t have stood off to the side and let Trump through, cause now you’ll get to watch the complete annihilation of Palestine, and even more of your tax dollars will go towards the genocide

        With Kamala you had someone you could work with and who responds to bad press and would have buckled to your demands. Now you got Trump who gives zero fucks about what you don’t like

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not American and you didn’t answer my question.

          If pro-palestinian one issue voters lost Kamala the election, why didn’t she appease them? Why are the voters to blame and not the democrats?

          • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            It wasn’t the one issue, it was just the one that stuck with people who needed an excuse to not show up and vote for a woman.

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’re doing the exact same thing. You are refusing to acknowledge any criticism to the Harris campaign and blaming voters for the loss.

              Misogyny absolutely played a role in this election and I do not want to downplay the racism and misogyny that Harris had to work against, but she ran a fucking awful campaign. She sucked up to fascists, ignored her base, and belittled the concerns pro-palestine protestors.

              I’m speaking now.

              • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Saying she ran an awful campaign is a judgement, one neither of us qualified to make legitimately (correct me if I’m wrong and you have some relevant professional experience)

                The voters spoke and said they did not see enough of a difference between Harris and Trump to vote for Harris, and the ones that saw a difference voted for Trump.

                Harris was out there making her platform and politics known, performing at debates.

                • Moneo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Saying she ran an awful campaign is a judgement

                  I mean yeah but if this is your mindset then why are you on the internet talking about politics? Am I supposed to meekly say, “Democrats tried their best but it just didn’t work out!”.

                  No I’m not an expert but I followed this election cycle quite closely and I listened to experienced commentators and weighed their opinions on the matter.

                  The average american is worse off than they have been in a long time and Harris did not adequately address that. She campaigned on securing the border and continuing to support a genocide. She didn’t promise to take on corporate greed, or to tax billionaires, or to make sure all americans have access to healthcare. She didn’t give voters anything to get excited about. Her campaign was laser focused on telling voters that Trump is bad and that they should vote for her.

                  Many people, myself included, think that was a terrible strategy. The election results seem evidence enough for me but apparently some people think election results are not a good indicator of whether or not someone ran a good campaign.

            • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think i can copy paste this comment somewhere on a 2016 thread about Hilary and it would make just as much sense.

              How about you tell this to someone who isn’t white, or better yet, someone who has family affected by the situation in gaza.

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s an excellent question. The Harris campaign decided to not let Palestinians speak at the DNC. The Uncommitted movement offered to endorse her but the staff refused to let any Palestinian Americans do so on camera, even with pre-vetted remarks. It’s mystifying and one of the major blunders of the Harris campaign.

            Harris seemed hyper focused on avoiding any criticism by Trump or Republicans. Hence she wouldn’t meet with Palestinian-Americans and avoided all the Muslim voters in Pennsylvania who were trying to meet with her. She was working so hard to get Republicans to flip and support her, which is why she did a rally with Liz Cheney and talked about how much she’d help Israel, and decided the Arab-American and Muslim-American votes were expendable if it meant getting more Republicans.

            Hillary tried the same strategy in 2016, and it failed badly. Throwing one of the most loyal democratic voting blocs under the bus to get Republicans to flip for them, has been a strategy of 2 of the last 3 elections (Biden promised to undo the Muslim ban but nothing else, so I don’t know if that counts) and they keep repeating this playbook with the same results. I fear that in 2028 they won’t even try to get our votes again and will try to cozy up to Trump’s Muslim ban in hopes that Republicans flip to democrat once again.

            • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Harris seemed hyper focused on avoiding any criticism by Trump or Republicans.

              Compare that with, “They are unanimous in their hate for me — and I welcome their hatred.” That line came from some four-term-President loser.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Because they shouldn’t have beeded to be convinced. Trump was obviously the worse choice for Palestine. The most basic realpolitik shouldve told them to hold their nose. They are to blame for putting their ideals over the lives of everyone around them and even those they want to save.

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Ok you go say that to their faces. Tell them they should suck it up and vote for an administration that is funding a genocide against their people. Tell them they’re being “idealistic” when they speak out against a genocide.

              Liberals are amazing.

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Answers to your comment are hilarious, these people deserve Trump but they don’t even realise this. Rats complaining about cockroaches.

          • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Im an Israeli anarchist, but I’m still going to try my best at explaining.

            American liberals won’t ever appease leftists, or minorities, because they expect subservience and loyalty for nothing in return. In so doing they play right into the fascists’ hands, trying to serve right wingers who already made their minds up in voting for a fascist.

            It is very likely not only more leftists but more Muslim and arabic people would’ve voted for dems if it weren’t for dems insisting that kamala should keep supporting israel and that criticism is amount to betrayal.

            As much as i despise electoralism, being an anarchist and all, it’s very simple to understand how and why this happened even from an electoralist perspective, makes one think maybe american liberals just don’t want to understand.

            And before anyone says I’m talking out of my ass about american libs, as if i don’t know them because I don’t live in the states: Know that they walk and talk just the same as israeli liberals, and these empty platitudes and threats of being a traitor are the same as i get at home.

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              If I’m understanding your comment correctly we’re more or less on the same page.

              My question is not a literal question but me pointing out the paradox sucking up to Israel to “win the election” and then blaming pro-palestine voters after they lose the election.

    • 4oreman@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      to be fair, the other candidate only had a few months. Biden is largely to blame.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lying is cheap, especially when the media just repeats your rallies without issue.

          The moment trump got free press in 2016 was the worst point. They could have ignored him and we would have been doing Clinton vs Cruz.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Truth is literally free…

            He got press because Clinton wanted it that way and he was the candidate, you can’t just not cover them.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              He wasn’t always the nomation. It should have been:

              “Wow Trump is trying to run. Weird. Anyways, moving on.”

              You look at all the people giving “commentary” as they play his full speeches of racism and go “lol no one will listen to that”. When clearly a lot of networks covering an (at the time) niche candidate gave him more attention.

              Also, lying is cheap. Investigating the truth costs time and labor. I can just say “The president is actually always mind controlled by Jews who are actually aliens” and it will take reasonable people longer to explain why that’s stupid, or look into why someone says it.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You don’t get to have a “perfect” candidate. Most of the time, your choices are between which choice you dislike the least. And when the choices are between Harris and another 4 years of Donald farking Trump . . . well holy jumping shitballs . . . that should have been the easiest choice in the world.

    Fark EVERYONE who made this possible. And enjoy your precious little “protest vote” Dems. This is your fault, too.

  • SonOfMothman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone that voted “uncommitted” just flattened Gaza… hood job voting for genocide you dumb fucks. You deserve this

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah yes the free Palestine crowd…lol wait until they see what Israel will do with no US restraint demands.