• seth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    I always heard “2 seconds of space” which is a lot more than a few car lengths, to give yourself time to react to both what’s in front of you and to the sides, and account for if their brakes perform better than yours. Two seconds of distance is a lot, though, and kind of impractical in traffic.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lord I hate those fucking cunts who see two car lengths of space as an invitation. I’m going 85, you’re going 75, don’t suddenly hop in front of me because the clown in front of you is going 70.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    yeah me too. i get a lot of rollerskaters squeezing into the space so i keep backing off til theyre all jammed ass to mouth like a human centipede. gotta keep my distance for when the chain binds. and it will

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Intelligent people leave a space of about two cars ahead of them on the freeway.

    Stupid people think that space must be for them.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It depends.

        On a well developed well maintained “freeway” with multiple lanes, shoulders for break downs, gentle curves, et cetera it’s common. 3 car lengths is more common here I think.

        That said, on a “highway” (interstate?) without everything listed above I aim for 2 seconds, which is about 60 metres at highway speed.

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    When i was 13 bill Clinton told me 1 car length per every 10mph i was traveling at. Ive been following that advice ever since

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      And I know it’s state dependent, but the highways by me, each white line is about one car and each gap is one car, so if you’re doing 50, having two to three white dashed lines between you and the car in front of you is probably good.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fun fact: In most states, this length is 40ft, but there are some exceptions, like CA, where it’s 24ft or 48ft depending on the road.

  • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I leave enough room for me to have time to react and give the person behind me enough time to react to my breaking. Because most people drive way too close to avoid a rear-end collision if I have to slam my breaks for an emergency. Sometimes that means I’m 4, 5 or 6 car lengths away from the car in front of me, but that has the added benefit of pissing off tailgators who will almost immediately choose to pass me which works out great for me. The less space the person behind gives, the more space I leave between me and the person in front.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just moved to Michigan

    I have never seen a group of drivers so committed to Tail Gateing … Like it’s the state sport

    • didntbuyasquirrel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was driving in slowish freeway traffic in Detroit and the guy behind me plowed right into me, didn’t even slow down, didn’t even look away. He sort of bounced off of me, pulled onto the shoulder, and squeeled off while I had to find some sketchy spot to stop and make sure my bumper wasn’t dragging too much.

      A person I was visiting there in Detroit told me that insurance wasn’t required so many people run off rather than risk getting blamed and the cops wouldn’t even bother with a report.

      • greenhorn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Insurance is required in all of Michigan, with fines, license suspension, and jail all possible for not having it. With Michigan’s no-fault insurance we have some of the highest rates in the country in Detroit—especially relative to income—and almost no viable alternative to owning a car.

        That said, as a native Detroiter I feel safer in Detroit driving around other Detroiters, the suburbanites and out of state folks are always in the way.

        • didntbuyasquirrel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I thought I heard that insurance laws changed maybe since then or around that time and there was a reason for a lot of hit and runs. I don’t know, but that was my experience a while ago. The weird part was mostly how the dude had no visible reaction at all except to take off, which probably could’ve been anywhere.

          As an out of towner I did have trouble with the short on ramps. I wasn’t sure how to get into a rhythm because there was no place to get up to speed. I didn’t like feeling like I had to shove my way in and it was hard to tell how to let others in safely. I suppose you just know those things when you live there long enough.

          • greenhorn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Those are some of the first below-grade expressways built in the country, so the shorter on ramps are from an era with fewer and slower cars, and there isn’t space to lengthen them. The law only changed to stop the insurance companies from using zip codes to determine rates, and reduced the maximum payout for healthcare related costs from a crash, with the aim of lowering costs, but of course the insurance companies worked around it.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Visit Tennessee and get back to me. Moving from Tennessee to Michigan I noticed a distinct uptick in the quality of driving.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a nice thought, but it has so many modifiers it’s pretty much worthless. Everything from road conditions, to time of day or night, to the size and weight and type of vehicle you are driving, to how old you are affects stopping distance and the interval you should be leaving.

    Remember children - Driving should never be “relaxing.” It’s real work and demands your total concentration to protect yourself and everyone around you. So put the phone down and even turn off the radio. Put your head on a swivel like a fighter pilot. And have an escape plan for every inch you drive.

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know why you are being downvoted since the distance from other cars should absolutely reflect the current conditions. I also agree that to drivers need to proactively look for possible collisions in mirrors and blind spots, though they should be generally calm and patient when driving.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Driving isn’t supposed to be as stressful as this comment put it. If it is then you shouldnt be allowed to drive.

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve always followed the rule of 1 car length for every 10 miles per hour you’re going.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        3 seconds when under 65. 5 seconds when it’s raining or I’m moving faster than posted highway speeds. It pisses people off but I’m hauling a ton of steel and plastic around, I’m not going to risk my life and everyone’s around me just because some guy is late for work or can’t be patient and needs to get where he’s going a few seconds before me. People tend to lose the reality of the situation when driving their super fast metal explosion machines.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        When I did driver’s training, they recommended about 2 seconds of distance. I find it to be a reasonable distance most of the time.

        • Sandile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          2 seconds is not enough. Average human reaction time takes more than half that time. I was also taught to keep 3 seconds minimum distance on average 80 km/h zone. Faster driving, more distance should be kept.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have a two lane road for most of commute every morning. What hate is when you pick up a buttplug. A buttplug is some dipshit who crawls up your ass and refuses to pass. They wont leave enough gap for the person behind them to pass without passing both of us and they wont pass themselves.

    What is crazy about this is that person will usually stay there until every car behind them has passed. After that they usually pass almost immediately.

    • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my experience, slowing down to just below the speed limit will usually irritate these tailgators enough to shake them off. Your mileage may vary though.

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is the way. Though I’ve had to come to a full stop and pull off the road a couple times…

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think my biggest pet peeve about driving is when you come to a stop and the car behind you tries to shove their nose up your ass. Like bruh you don’t need to ever be that close

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      At a stop? Who cares? Can’t being closer together at a stop light at least help with intersections? I guess it depends on the city.

      If you’re driving a manual and you roll back on a stop, you shouldn’t be driving a manual. Unless you live in like San Francisco I guess? In the Appalachian region, cops will stop you for rolling back.

    • OR3X@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially annoying if you’re driving a manual and are stopped on an incline.

        • OR3X@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I can usually set off on an incline with no rollback but I’ll be damn if it doesn’t slightly stress me out every time someone pulls that shit.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I feel like it really isn’t your fault if you role back 6 inches and hit them. If you were to roll back 4 feet it would be different but in this case you can’t control something so small.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            In court it won’t be your fault if they’re that close, but it’s still the hassle of dealing with people who don’t understand basic driving etiquette.

    • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My driving instructor taught me that I should still be able to see the other car’s back wheels when I stop. I actually don’t know how close that looks from the other driver’s perspective.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Terrible, terrible advice. That leaves a full car-length of empty pavement with the driver sight-lines of modern SUV and crossover designs. Pickup trucks are worse; I’ve seen pickup truck drivers stop a full 30 feet back. It wastes huge amounts of space on the street, and causes traffic congestion. On the other side of the coin, van and bus drivers can still get right up on your ass when following this advice.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        What it looks like:

        1000005472

        Not actually as the “see the tires” rule is fairly good advise. Keep in mind sometimes it is smarter to give a little more space depending on the situation. Think of it as more of a minimum. Also lose most of your speed farther back and then role forward. This allows for recovery time in case of failure or loss of traction.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      if they are following the two second rule they should be less than a foot from your car. If your car is stopped you are always more than two seconds from the car in front of you.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Only a fool breaks the 2 second rule.”

      I was taught to repeat that phrase, at a normal steady pace, when I saw the back of their car go past something, to use as a marker (a signpost, the end of one of the lines on the road, whatever).

      If you finish the phrase after the front of your car has gone past the same marker, then you don’t have a big enough braking distance and need to ease off a bit.