• uienia@lemmy.world
            0·
            3 months ago

            What on Earth are you on about? “denigrate Americans”. They are pointing out facts. That you apparently are so fragile that you consider that denigration is entirely on yourself.

            • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
              0·
              3 months ago

              Look at their comment history. They can’t go two days without getting in a dig at Americans. Even when it’s completely irrelevant and off topic. I’m just pointing out that this person has a bone to pick and not to take it personally.

              The funny part is that they’re often completely wrong when they try to talk shit. Like here, thinking that India having a larger population than the US is some kind of gotcha moment, despite less than 10% of that population speaking English.

              I’ll just transcribe a few lovely comments from our good friend Mr Blott.

              Glock pistols popular in US because of the proliferation of fucking cowards

              Scared of their own fucking shadows, those pussies

              What’s the difference between a cow and 9/11

              You’d stop milking a cow after 23 years

              Seems a bit unnecessary when you could just dress the ivy up like schoolkids and the yanks would wipe it out in a week

              German

              I’m guessing a yank whose great great great great great great grandfather once wiped his cock on a strudel

              They’re using American weapons, they should just aim for schools

              Holy fuck, yanks are weird

              God I’d hate to have such poor reading comprehension. You’d last about a minute in UK based communities lol

              You’re not out of the dark ages, you quivering shitebag lol

              You mean prison slavery? That’s the US, get on it lol

              Did it come out of the States?

              If so, guaranteed utter fucking horseshit

              You can punch your hand through your plasterboard mate lol

              You can always spot an American because they’re so fuckin scared of everything. Look, this one’s scared of his own shite 😂

              Of course!

              Just lose the -

              • Guns
              • Tiny-penis trucks
              • the “right” to hate-speech
              • the religious weirdo thing

              And you’ll be getting close to the 20th century!

              Know how yous get upset when people say “Americans are stupid”

              Literally a third of you have demonstrated that you’d eat gravel if someone said it’d cure immigrants

              A third. So lets just say only half of the other two thirds are stupid

              That’s quite a few. Almost a quarter pounder

              Yous cunts are greedy to the point of being fuckin EVIL

              That’s just… evil, taking money from poor folk and their kids

              How are yous letting evil cunts do this to your fellow citizens? How are you not fucking getting the flaming torches out?

              Selfish fucking cunts, the lot of you. Stand up for not just yourselves, for all of yous

              The bot is only “spreading misinformation” to people who are too stupid to realise that “left” and “right” mean politically different things in different countries

              Mostly the yanks

              I feel really sorry for this guy

              What kind of unhinged parents call their kid Tyreek?

              This is just from the past few weeks lmao. This dude has issues.

            • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
              0·
              3 months ago

              Surprised at a yank using the word “denigrate” without clutching their pearls at the etymology of it lol

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      Your comment is very typical of that (fallacious) US centrism. People write in English on the internet because that is the universal language. There are far more secondary English speakers on the internet than primary English speakers.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    As an American who just wants things organized clearly, I find it annoying too

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    This is why:

    The US has more allocated IPv4 addresses and more users per allocated IPv4 address than any other country, by wide margins - and IPv6 adoption is not that widespread yet. It is entirely rational to assume that an English-speaking person on the Internet is from the US, given no other information.

    reference

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        Of course English is spoken in other countries, and other countries have high numbers of internet users, but it does not follow that English is a commonly used language for internet users in other countries. Most Chinese are probably speaking Chinese, most Indians are probably speaking Hindi.

        The IPv6 graph you linked shows that adoption is still less than 50%, and I’m not clear on their methodology… does “users that access Google” mean users with Google accounts? or individual users that use google.com? or does it include all of their cloud services? do web servers linking content from Google Ads count? does this data represent mostly end users, or also infrastructure connections?

        • uienia@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 months ago

          When non-native English speakers are navigating in a non-national internet setting we use English. I have gathered from the many American comments in this thread, that that fact is apparently incredibly difficult for Americans to gauge. Nevertheless, it is a fact.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        I would love to see a more recent source if you have one.

        Regardless, possession of IP addresses doesn’t change all that much. In the early days a company could buy an entire Class A (1.X.X.X) address space comprising 16million+ addresses for their private use. There are still many companies holding large blocks of addresses, and most of those companies are in the US, and they don’t just give up those addresses.

        The point being, there’s significant resistance to redistributing addresses once they’ve been allocated. They don’t change hands terribly often (and keep in mind we’re talking about actual internet addresses, not local network addresses that are being dynamically assigned and NATed across router domains).

    • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
      0·
      3 months ago

      No, they highlight some problems with IP4: Bad distribution of IP4 ranges and bad usage of those ranges. So the graphs show the US has way too much IP actresses, some under used/unused and some overused. The blog post they are from is pretty clear about this.

      These graphs do not give an indication of how many users per country there are. There are in fact statistics on that which expectedly show China and India on top. These however do not take into account that social media use way more popular in the U.S. for now.

      The closest stat may be Reddit users by country which seems to indicate that about every 2nd user is from the US. (Not sure if Russian/Chinese bot accounts also count towards these though).

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        These graphs do not give an indication of how many users per country there are. There are in fact statistics on that which expectedly show China and India on top.

        Well sure, but people from those countries are far less likely to be speaking English, which is why I said:

        It is entirely rational to assume that an English-speaking person on the Internet is from the US, given no other information.

        The prevalence of internet use in countries with primary languages other than English has no bearing on this statement.

        The point of using the IP address statistics is to show that the vast majority of websites on the Internet were created in the US for the US market, and that is still true today.

        On a side note, the distribution of addresses is unbalanced but it isn’t “bad”. It is a consequence of a system growing over time. Communications infrastructure cannot pop into existence everywhere all at once, and realistically not many people outside the US had any interest in the internet in 1983.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          0·
          3 months ago

          Sorry, are you trying to prove beyond a doubt that you are dishonest and statistics-illiterate?

          which is why I said:

          It is entirely rational to assume that an English-speaking person on the Internet is from the US, given no other information.

          No, you wrote:

          **The US has more allocated IPv4 addresses and more users per allocated IPv4 address than any other country, by wide margins **- and IPv6 adoption is not that widespread yet. It is entirely rational to assume that an English-speaking person on the Internet is from the US, given no other information.

          So your assumption is based on a gross misinterpretation of the statistics you presented. Your incorrect interpretation of the graphs would put US participation at about 99,99%, which is obviously ridiculous.

          Also according to Wikipedia the percentage of English speakers located in the US is lower that 20%. Does this mean that only 1 in 5 users is from the US?

          The point of using the IP address statistics is to show that the vast majority of websites on the Internet were created in the US for the US market, and that is still true today.

          That’s not at all what these graphs show though. While I agree that most websites might be US targeted towards the US calling that ‘vast’ is bit of a stretch.

          … and realistically not many people outside the US had any interest in the internet in 1983.

          I gather you’ve not been around then. Almost none had any interest in “the internet” until the mid 90s - this includes the US. Partly because what you refer to as “the internet” was called WWW back then and started only 1989. People had been very anal about this until about 2005 - I guess you haven’t been around then either.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      0·
      3 months ago

      That would be 3 addresses per US citizen. You have some whales like MS in there, just because your companies can grow dangerously big.

  • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    i live in DC and we get tagged for everything world politics.

    forgive me for not caring if fvey countries get lumped into uspol.

  • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
    0·
    3 months ago

    Which nation is lemmy.world hosted in again?

    I’ll never understand people’s obsession over complaining about Americans existing on American websites.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      It’s hosted in Finland, by a German company, and has Dutch admins. Was that your point?

      Edit: bonus, the Lemmy devs get paid from a Dutch grant and the ones whose nationality I know are not from the US

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      0·
      3 months ago

      If any instance uses anything akin to cloudflare, Google, a cloud provider or a CDN then this question makes no sense because it’s “hosted” all over the world.

      Not that it ever made any sense because why would it matter where a website is hosted if it’s equally accessible globally? It’s not like you have to type a longer URL to hit it from Europe lmfao, and It’s not like the internet is some sort of local US thing where you have to hear about it by word of mouth.

    • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      0·
      3 months ago

      The word world is literally in the name… When I joined lemmy I started there because I assumed it would be a general instance. It’s like worldnews where 90% of posts are US politics. Also, it’s not an obsession, most times it comes up it’s just a joke (like this meme).

  • MBM@lemmings.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if a news community with a “no mentioning the US” rule would work. Not out of any hate, just as something arbitrary like “don’t use the letter E”.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      There was one on Reddit that had a rule that no more than 50% of a story could be about the US and if the US was one of two parties they preferred the other point of view.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    To be fair, the US has the largest number of English-speakers of any country in the world. As a first language, it has five times as many native English speakers as second place (the UK). It also has one of the highest Internet penetration rates in the world, meaning most of those English-speakers are also Internet users.

    The US is a single country that is three-quarters the population of the entire continent of Europe, and nearly all of its inhabitants speak English and use the Internet. So yes, if you pick a random user on an English social media page, odds are very good that person is an American. If you were to guess any random English-speaking Internet user’s nationality, “American” is the best possible guess. But go on a Spanish language forum or a French language forum and nobody will assume you’re American.

    Consequently, Americans generate the majority of English-language Internet content.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      Again, you are completely missing the point of the internet and English usage on it. People are using English as a lingua franca. There are a lot more non-native English speakers on the internet than native English speakers.

      So no, odds are not that it is an American you are speaking to, just because that person speaks English. You are literally regurgitating the fallacy that OP is about.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        We should really be counting English literate people, since nobody here is talking, and literacy is more reading/writing.

        Literacy is pretty broad too. It doesn’t imply that it’s your native language, nor if you can speak the language (whether you can do that very well or not).

        Literacy is going to be a bonefide requirement for most of the internet, with some exceptions, like text to speech and speech recognition stuff, people with disabilities who may not be able to see properly or at all… Stuff like that.

    • pixelscript@lemm.eeEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      The more egalitarian principle would be to not assume. I won’t deny that. People from more minority locales have every right to be upset at being marginalized.

      But at the same time, whenever I read passive aggressive comments on socials from residents of crown countries or from EAASL people around the world bitching about US defaultism as if people are doing it just to be ignorant dicks, I can only think to myself, “Uhh, hello? What do you think the demographics of this space were? What did you expect?”

      Americans are hardly the majority of the world’s English speakers, but for all the reasons you listed, they tend to remain a massive plurality, if not an outright overwhelming majority, of any mainstream online English language platform. No, that’s not a license to perpetuate US defaultism. But like… read the room, people. Your good fight is far more uphill than you seem to think it is.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      0·
      3 months ago

      Americans generate the majority of English-language Internet content.

      Doubt.

      There are 1.3 billion people who use English on the internet as a first or second language.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        Not all Internet users generate the same amount of content. In addition to Americans being proud blabbermouths in general, people from wealthy countries generate more content than those from poorer countries. The US is among the wealthiest countries in the world.

        Although it is not the most representative, nearly half of all Reddit users are American. American media outlets have immense global reach. You can probably name four or five American media outlets just off the top of your head, even if you’re not American. The USA’s geopolitical power means people are always talking about American politics or what America’s leaders are doing, which draws engagement from Americans like a lamp draws moths. 7 out of the top 10 English-language YouTube channels are American (fully or partially).

        It’s pretty much impossible to prove, but I think the claim that Americans generate most of the content on the Internet is likely true or very close to true.

        It’s even more convincing if you exclude English Internet users from India, as a quick visit to any forum dominated by Indian users will cause you to quickly realise that the language used there is not really English but a mix of English and Hindi which is not comprehensible to non-Indians.

        • uienia@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 months ago

          Again, the numbers you linked shows that you are more likely to speak to a non-American on reddit than an American. Your entire premise is flawed from the beginning.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      0·
      3 months ago

      I’m sorry but this is nonsense. I’m in a lot of online communities where everyone uses English, despite it being nearly nobody’s first language. It just happens to be the only language that everyone there knows. Language is no indication of nationality, especially online.

      And to be honest, in those places the assumption is usually that everyone is European, which I can imagine is just as annoying for the stray American.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        I think you misunderstand.

        What I am saying is that of all Internet users that use English, Americans are by far the largest group due to it being a very large country, (third most populous in the world) with a high Internet penetration (97%), and whose residents speak English as their main language (78.3%).

        • uienia@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 months ago

          What I am saying is that of all Internet users that use English, Americans are by far the largest group

          No, they didn’t misunderstand. It is you who are massively misunderstanding. You are suffering from the erronous assumption that people who speak English on the internet are native English speakers when that it is not so at all. People speak English on the internet because it is the largest commonly understood language. So people from non-English speaking countries are using it as well. And there are a heck of a lot more non-native English speakers in the world than native English speakers.

          So you are most likely at any time on the internet to be speaking to a non-native English speaker, and thus definitely not an American.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            0·
            3 months ago

            I did not claim the people who use English on the Internet are likely native English speakers.

            I made the converse claim—that people whose native language is English are likely to use English on the Internet.

        • zerofk@lemm.ee
          0·
          3 months ago

          But I would argue that the rest of the world also uses primarily English online. And just by virtue of being the rest of the world, outnumbers the Americans.

          In other words, of all Internet users that use English, the vast majority is likely not American.

          Of course I don’t have data to back this up, except anecdotally.

        • s3p5r@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          3 months ago

          This list puts US at ~297m English speakers which is the largest group from one single country, that is true. But 297m / 1,537m = The US has 19.35% of English speakers globally.

          You are likely also greatly underestimating current internet connectivity, older smartphones have changed things for poorer countries a lot over the past decade. For example, India has only 62.6% of people as internet users - but that’s still 880m people and probably most of their 125m English speakers. Nigeria has 63.8% internet users, but that’s 136m internet users. And they also have 125m English speakers, who again, are more likely to be the people who can afford an English education, and also a smartphone. And then there’s Pakistan with another 100m English speakers and 70.8% internet users, etc.

          Just 3 countries, (2 of which were 1 country 80 years ago) and you’re close to that 300 million count already.

          The list also gives US as 92.4% internet users, for what it’s worth. A little less than 97% and not even in the top 20 countries by percentage, which is surprising.

          The internet is less American than ever. It’s just that most non-American people probably have non-English language spaces they can choose to gather in addition to the English-dominated spaces. Americans, on the other hand, are more likely to be monolingual English speakers and so they concentrate in the English-dominated spaces.

          And non-Americans are all so used to people assuming American defaultism in English-dominated internet spaces because it was historically hugely expensive to get online and was overwhelmingly American English-speaking, that it’s not even worth correcting when it happens the millionth time.

          I’ve also put non-metric and US currency conversions in posts online many times. Not because I’m American or use them in daily life. It was just less annoying to convert them when writing rather than hear the inevitable multiple complaints about not understanding things in meters and dessicated jokes like “that’s probably $2 in real money”.

          You’re either overestimating the accuracy of your assumptions about your online interactions and/or seeing selection bias from your immersion in otherwise culturally isolated spaces.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        The average American uses only English language forums.

        The average European who speaks English will probably spend some portion of their time using whatever their native language is.

        The average English speaker in Africa is not as likely to have an Internet connection.

        The average English speaker in China is likely to not be able to access English social media sites (great firewall).

        Many English-speakers in India post online in a mix of English and Hindi that non-Indians find difficult to comprehend.

        You’re correct that the claim that the US is ¾ the population of Europe is erroneous. But it is ¾ the population of the EU. I’ve corrected this.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          0·
          3 months ago

          I admire your determination to bend your perception of facts to fit your narrative.

          • Russia, Kanada, Australia, South America? Apparently they ceased to exist.
          • Africa? They still live in mud and abject poverty. There is no electricity nor Internet.
          • China? They’re 100% locked in. (No bots no nothing.)
          • Indians can’t write proper English (a bit rich coming from an USAmerican)
          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            0·
            3 months ago

            Surely you have a bit more thinking power than that. If you gave each of your bullet points a mere five seconds each of critical thought, you wouldn’t have made this ridiculous comment.

            Those countries you mentioned? Of course there are people living in them. But there aren’t as many English-speakers as in America. I didn’t say all, I say most (this will be a recurring theme).

            With the exception of southern Africa (76%), the rest of Africa has Internet penetration rates below 50%. As low as 27% in east Africa. Remember, I didn’t say all, I said most.

            China’s great firewall prevents most people from accessing the outside Internet, and many Chinese people don’t care to. I know this, because I’m fucking Chinese. Is it possible to circumvent? Sure, if you’re willing to play VPN whack-a-mole with the CCP or are lucky enough to be the 1% of China that lives in Hong Kong or Macau. But again, I said most, I didn’t say all.

            You also clearly have never been on any forums populated by Indian users if you think that I’m only saying Indians use unintelligible English on the Internet because I’m racist. They code-switch between English and Hindi. If you don’t know Hindi, you won’t understand it. Are all posts like this? Of course not. But a great deal are. I never said all, I said most.

            Here are random top comments from the top posts of Reddit’s r/Indiasocial that show what I’m talking about:

            Kal bolne ja rha Hu usko . Want to get it over it once and for all been bugging me since some time . No boldiya toh sahi hai Padhai kar lunga .

            Kassh bta pata mummy ko apni sab problems. Bta bii nhi pata kyuki woh chinta karengii

            OP ke AAnde jalwa diye

            Folks, look what I found during cleaning today😭🥺🥹

            I am so happy that my mom has still kept all of stuff in the store room. Woh bhi kya din the🥹🥹

            Bhai hamare side ke Ghar mein kirayedar rehte Hain. To un baccho kii ball hamari chat ya backyard mein aa jati thi aur mere ek Purina badi wali thaili bharke balls bahut variety Hain par mummy nikalne NAHI deti.

            Time to leave this sub. Har dusara post my gf/bf made this, i went for date, gift given by my bf/gf. Had hai

            And also, I don’t use American English. I live in America but I am a Hongkonger and use British English.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              0·
              3 months ago

              They code-switch between English and Hindi. If you don’t know Hindi, you won’t understand it. Are all posts like this? Of course not.

              You’re so close. Let me give you another hint: What do you think every other regional sub looks like? (I speak multiple languages, so I’ve been to multiple regionals - including in Languages I don’t really speak)

              Also, yes it is a bit racist to assume that Indians are only able to converse in an Hindi/English mix and unable to converse in proper English. On top of that it is a bit stupid to assume all of India speaks Hindi - e.g. most of Bengalurians speak Kannada.

              But there aren’t as many English-speakers as in America. I didn’t say all, I say most (this will be a recurring theme).

              You’re correct. It’s a recurring theme. You have been made aware by multiple people now that you over-inflate the percentage of USAmericans among the users of English-speaking forums and that you have been incredibly ignorant about it.

              I think none will dispute that US located users are in the majority - the majority is however not as big as you make it out to be. (and your reasoning is - for lack of a better term - atrocious)

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        This point was plainly addressed. Read carefully before going in guns-blazing.

        Do you think Nigerians use the Internet as much as Americans?

  • OpenStars@discuss.onlineEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    Tbf it seemed to make more sense for the likes of Reddit, Facebook, etc. Similarly if I go to a Chinese forum I would not assume that everyone there was from the USA.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      0·
      3 months ago

      I’ve heard this more times, and it’s kind of baffling. The US isn’t even the biggest individual country on Facebook. What do people who assume everyone is from the US think a non-US “forum” looks like? Where do Americans think everybody else hangs out online?

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zipEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        Given how many people choose to speak their native language in the US (myself included), I guess they assume they post to forums that are in their language.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          0·
          3 months ago

          So like Facebook and Reddit? Social media isn’t in English specifically. People who speak other languages often post in their native language for some things and in the lingua franca for more international conversations. The Internet is the Internet regardless.

      • Graphy@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        As a US citizen I think we forget how much of our shit gets out.

        I’m always surprised when I go abroad and people are up to date with somewhat niche US info. I was in Hong Kong and some local dude made a reference to the fatass NJ gov who was chilling on the closed beach during lockdowns.

        I do feel like I see far more people complaining about US people making assumptions than I do US people assuming. When I’m replying to someone I don’t put any thought into where they’re from unless they drop a context clue.

        • wieson@feddit.org
          0·
          3 months ago

          Note: this is just for your understanding, I’m not criticising you.

          It’s the little things, like using NJ as a short form assuming everyone to know. Hong Kong is arguably more well known globally, but you spelled it out.

          The ones in the know often don’t see the assumption.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            0·
            3 months ago

            This is true. I wonder how often people assume and don’t think anything of it because it doesn’t even register that they may not be correct.

            That said, I once did have a long conversation here with someone who just straight-up refused to believe I’m not American and would not take my word for it. I never quite got why he believed I’d be lying about that, but that person would not be persuaded, and it was one of the most baffling interactions I’ve had in my life.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          0·
          3 months ago

          I am fairly sure that the rest of the world already existed. And those formats keep being in use in newer places, too. This is not just a Reddit thing. Even you mentioned Facebook, which was instantly popular globally.

          • OpenStars@discuss.onlineEnglish
            0·
            3 months ago

            I am fairly sure that the rest of the world already existed.

            No way - at least not back then! Source: am American, and therefore entirely confident that no other nations existed prior to my hearing about them (Christopher Columbus told me so! 😛). And maybe even then… which reminds me, are you so sure that you are real? Maybe you too are in America and just forgot? 🫠

            Also, just so we are clear, “American” = “USAian”, definitely no other nations exist on the American continent, nope, no way! (Except Canada and Mexico, and they get a pass as wannabe USA states) 😜

          • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
            0·
            3 months ago

            instantly popular globally

            There are 8 billion people on this planet, nothing happens instantly.

            Facebook took a long time to spread around the globe. Same for reddit, this is a quote from the Wikipedia article:

            As of August 2024, Reddit is the 9th most-visited website in the world. According to data provided by Similarweb, 51.75% of the website traffic comes from the United States, followed by the United Kingdom at 7.15% and Canada at 7.09%.[6]

            More than two thirds of reddit traffic still comes from Anglophone countries to this day, and that percentage was surely much higher back in the early days.

            I think you’re severely overestimating how many people from other countries actually use Western social media. Between the language barrier and the technology barrier, most people on this planet simply don’t have any opportunity or desire to use a site like Reddit or Lemmy. Facebook has slowly but steadily made global inroads, but by the time it got popular in non-western countries, Americans had largely moved on.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              0·
              3 months ago

              … I am a non-anglophone who, at the time of Facebook’s raise to social media dominance lived in multiple non-anglophone countries. I was there.

              In one of the places I lived there was briefly a popular local Facebook alternative. It lasted maybe a couple of years before entirely capitulating and getting absorbed. That place does still have a local Reddit-like alternative, and Reddit is certainly more US-centric. You are right that Facebook stayed popular much longer outside the US. It has started falling off in some of those places, but I did keep a Facebook account for work purposes for a lot longer than you’d expect because work relations in those territories would share Facebook credentials as a way to establish professional contact. Twitter may as well have been a lost ancient civilization, though.

              There’s also a lot to unpack in the assumption that on a thread about “why do Americans default to assuming everyone is from the US” you’re reflexively lumping the entire anglosphere as part of the US, but honestly, I’ll let the recently annexed English-speaking countries deal with that one on their own.

              • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
                0·
                3 months ago

                That’s interesting, thanks for sharing. I don’t mean to diminish your experience, but the world is simply too massive for anecdotal knowledge to apply when attempting to make sense of it. In other words, it’s impossible to gather a balanced understanding of global phenomena via primary experiences. I’m not as well traveled as you, but I’m analyzing the statistics rather than relying on personal experiences, which is much more informative when trying to recognize the big picture.

                I’m not reflexively lumping anything in, I’m simply recognizing the reality that the cultural life of anglosphere countries is heavily mixed, and that US culture dominates that mixture due to its size and economic position. It’s not a controversial statement to say that Canada and the US are peas in a pod.

                I left the original assumption unchallenged, but I don’t agree with it tbh. There are a ton of Europeans on Lemmy and also reddit, and it’s quite obvious to notice as an American. Furthermore, the entire premise is faulty. Rather than ask why people default to the US, the question is why people are assuming anything at all about anonymous accounts. And the answer is because of human nature, which isn’t something unique to Americans.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  0·
                  3 months ago

                  Well, yeah, but it’s not anecdotal. There is data to tell you how big Facebook is and was outside the US, in what territories and by how much relative to their US popularity at what point. My personal experience just happens to match those numbers (India, by the way, is Facebook’s current biggest market).

                  I would also point out that by your own data, which is accurate as far as I can tell, 49% of Reddit is not American, so even with its more US-focused audience the assumption that users are American unless proven otherwise is wildly ethnocentric.

                  Now, I agree with you that assuming things about anonymous accounts, and especially anonymous accounts writing in English, is foolish. Lots of people are fluent in English who are not native speakers and definitely who are not from the US. Most, in fact, depending on how you define your parameters.

                  I disagree that this is “human nature”, though. I don’t assume the same thing from people who speak my native language online. I also don’t assume the same thing about English speakers. The reason the OP is asking is that US ethnocentrism stands out. That’s not to say it’s not natural. We non-native dwellers in anglocentric social media will often comment on US cultural and political minutia, because US cultural and political minutia is present and relevant to us in a way ours isn’t to Americans (thanks for that, cultural imperialism). We pass for Americans in more situations than some American lurking in a German-language forum would, and we’re likely many times more numerous than… well, Americans lurking in German-language or Chinese-language socials.

                  But it being natural doesn’t mean it isn’t notable or an issue or a symptom of a dysfunction. Which it is, and it does annoy me for that reason.