• VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    People still repeating this is a real proof no amount of facts or access to information matters if the lie is a fun one that fits your existing biases

  • Crewman@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    TIL Edison didn’t kill Topsy the elephant, but did electrocute a bunch of stray animals.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve seen electrocuted being wrongly use when referring to being shocked, but not the viceversa

  • Ferris@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    theyre not even necessarily evil, theyre just dingdong regular people that ran into a situation and learned to live with it

  • kindenough@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Edison shocked animals with AC to disprove Tesla, trying to prove that DC is safer. That is fact. However, the article already states in the beginning:

    Edison’s link to the death of Topsy the elephant may not be entirely grounded in reality.

    As I posted a while back, this is a rumor that comes along often, The killing of Topsy was done by her handlers as they wanted to get rid of her, they could not handle her anymore after an incident with her original handler. The film of the killing was released by Edison films yes, but Topsy was killed a decade after the war of the currents, and Edison wasn’t even in charge anymore of the company after the merger with General Electric. He wasn’t present during the electrocution of Topsy, did not have any electric business anymore, and again there is no evidence whatsoever that he was involved.

    I learned about the killing of Topsy because I am very interested in the life of Nicolai Tesla and his inventions. I dislike Edison because imo he did Tesla wrong, but I learned quickly that the most despicable thing attributed to him is very likely not true.

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/topsy-elephant-was-victim-her-captors-not-really-thomas-edison-180961611/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_(elephant)

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Topsy was also electrocuted at the request of the ASPCA because otherwise she was going to be hanged and it was seen as more humane, which always seems to get left out.

      To clarify, Edison wasn’t trying to ‘disprove’ Tesla, the War of the Currents was Edison vs Westinghouse. Tesla didn’t invent AC, he would’ve learned about that in engineering school, he invented the 3 phase motor, which made AC significantly more practical. Tesla had an argument with one of Edison’s managers over pay, not with Edison. Tesla and Edison wrote each other letters later on and generally spoke positively of each other in public.

      Tesla’s an interesting guy but unfortunately went off the deep end pretty steeply. His ‘death ray’ was a ‘blueprint’ he sold to his landlord instead of paying rent and is basically gibberish. Wardenclyffe tower was doomed by not understanding wireless transmission and is basically a Bond villain device. Turning the Ionosphere and Mantel in to halves of a capacitor would both take more energy than humans have ever generated and be really really really bad for anything tall and conductive, which would be basically everything with the energies involved.

      • bbuez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Turning the Ionosphere and Mantel in to halves of a capacitor would both take more energy than humans have ever generated and be really really really bad for anything tall and conductive

        This is the first time I’ve heard of this hypothesis, as I’ve just generally avoided media talking about the secrets of Tesla’s free energy or whatever, but I am very curious how this would work and what such tripple really bad would happen, sounds like a sweet soft sci fi setting.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tesla’s design [for Wardenclyffe] used a concept of a charged conductive upper layer in the atmosphere, a theory dating back to an 1872 idea for a proposed wireless power system by Mahlon Loomis. Tesla not only believed that he could use this layer as his return path in his electrical conduction system, but that the power flowing through it would make it glow, providing night time lighting for cities and shipping lanes.

          It’s a very Victorian / Steampunk idea that is also kind of horrifying. It’s working off theories of what electricity “is” that we now know aren’t accurate, but if you try to scale them to actually working every building and tree and person is now a lightning rod.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Agreed, Tesla is way overvalued. It doesn’t help that he gets picked up by free energy cranks. When one shows up at my makerspace, they almost always cite Tesla somewhere.

        Not that Tesla did nothing, but people can’t leave it at his actual accomplishments. The fact that so much of his work can’t be reproduced is seen as deep magic rather than a failure of science.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The more you read about that shithead edison, the worse it gets. The asshole acted with an impunity that defies modern logic.
    As it was, there was no social media and our current sensibilities back then, information took much more effort to spread, so way too many people have revered him as some sort of saintly hero. Word didn’t spread about how narcissistic and petty, how cruel to the point of savagery, he was.

    That goes ditto for Marconi, his “billion-dollar innovation” consisted of stealing every academic research idea and design within reach, and patenting every single one as his own.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The asshole acted with an impunity that defies modern logic.

      … have you not seen how our modern billionaires act?

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It was in my mind, but I think Edison got away with some things that exceed the current crop of billionaires, by at least one length, as they say in horse racing. Especially during his no-holds-barred attack on Westinghouse/Tesla and their alternating current, while Edison pushed direct current, which included his inventions to create and deliver it. He had the whole goddamned infrastructure planned out, world domination for decades and decades was at stake here.

        But even as Edison pushed every vicious tactic to discredit DC as unsafe, Nikolai Tesla came out the winner, and he did it with dignity and style. Remember the famous photos of Tesla by the arcing electric wires and stuff? Those were publicity shots to show the world (well… mostly NYC at the time, where the AC vs DC war was being fought) that DC was safe enough for even the inventor to sit there casually and read the newspaper.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Of course there is. It may not be morally justified, but it’s still logical.

          Their logic isn’t “We need to better society so that all may live in harmony”, it’s “I must control as much as possible to stave off the inevitable nothingness of death”.

          Assuming all things that are repugnant to you have no logic to them at all is an easy way to misunderstand and underestimate those who can do the most harm to you.