• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    its why most democrats are against him too.

    Cause hes setting a dangerous precedent of an elected official serving people, not money.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Slavoj Zizek calls the Democrats “capitalism with a kinder face - LGBT rights and so on and so on.”

      That’s really it. They think the core economic system is working. They’re fine to greenlight social policies that don’t challenge it, especially if they think it will win them votes. And that’s all they are.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Slavoj Zizek calls the Democrats “capitalism with a kinder face - LGBT rights and so on and so on.”

        Let’s not pretend they stand for the T in that acronym.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They stand for whatever gets them votes. Given the current cultural climate with the right actively controlling the media landscape and the left busy purity testing before they even consider voting, they would obviously consider taking a seat on the topic.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGfE-mbdmXg

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They stand for whatever gets them votes.

            They stand for genocide and nothing else and do not care about votes.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Then you should have no problem identifying an issue that the centrist wing of the party has fought for harder than it fought for netanyahu’s campaign of genocide.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My thought is that for many many years politicians didn’t really have to do anything to re-elected. And when they were asked to do something they would always say “we can’t afford that.” or they would write a bill that would promise “thing” will get funded 10 years from now. So these lifelong politicians have turned into lazy fucks just there for the money and are pissed at these younger officials that are actually doing the job they were elected to do.

      I have to admit I had been lulled into a sense of nothing will change attitude and now that I see how wrong I was I’ve become quite pissed off.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That won’t be their first instinct. Their first instinct will be to kill anybody who seems at all threatening.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The reason the right are so anti Mamdani is obvious: they don’t want you to see what your tax dollars being put to work the right way would actually look like.

    More like the left way 🥁

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Civilization is expensive and can only be paid for on the installment plan.

    When you see what good your taxes can do, it makes you question why the rich don’t pay their fair share. They do not like this.

  • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The far right are so virulently anti-Mamdani bcs they know it’ll get the compatible left to even more entrench their support for him even as he’s already drifting towards the positions of the center-right party that he’s adopted, despite them fighting tooth and nail to keep him out of office.

    Everything in politics makes way more sense when you stop believing the kayfabe and recognize they’re all on the same team. “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.”

  • sepi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    BUT HOW ARE THE LANDLORDS (I am not one) GONNA AFFORD TO LIVE!!! THE POOOR LANDLORDS

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      BUT HOW ARE THE LANDLORDS (I am not one)

      So many of these NYT / WaPo Op-Eds are written by Landlords. So many Twitter shitposts and Facebook hate threads are started by landlords. So much of the local news bullshit is financed by landlords.

      The NYPost is landlord required reading.

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Shit no. That would be like living in Mordor. No, to hallow that place turn it into the Trump library with every floor an exhibition of the lies, stupidity, evil and crimes he committed, with the penthouse dedicated to the Epstein Files.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was gonna say to just line every wall on every floor with copies of the unredacted files. Name it the Trump Epstein Corruption Library

  • UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s why the corporate neo-libs hate him too. They truly are in the business of managing decline instead of doing their fucking jobs.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Until he arrests Netanyahu and stops the NYPD from brutalizing protestors, I’m going to stay highly skeptical of him. At the end of the day, bourgeois democracy will never serve the interests of the people. He’s controlled opposition.

    • argarath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      He literally explained how he cannot arrest Netanyahu and told exactly who is stopping him and called Netanyahu a criminal several times on that announcement. The NYPD thing I cannot argue against because I literally know nothing of it, so I’d love to learn about it, but calling him a controlled opposition smells of either right wing paid troll to get the left to not like Mamdani or a person who really wants to let perfect be the enemy of good. Gog forbid anyone be less than perfect and help us move towards a better future in any shape or form besides all the way in a single move exactly how I envision it

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The mindset that there’s one person who’s going to save us is something that the left has to just get rid of. It doesn’t matter whether it’s Mamdani or Bernie or AOC. Putting anybody up on a pedestal like that just means that they’re inevitably going to disappoint you, because they aren’t gods, they’re human, and the machine that they’re a part of is so much bigger than they are.

        No, he isn’t “controlled opposition”, but he also isn’t some socialist ubermensch who can’t ever be corrupted. What is important is the movement, not these figureheads.

  • feral_sh@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think they’re afraid of over reach. A lot of them would love the services he’s building!

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “At no cost to the city”. The office building is going to be developed by GFP Real Estate and in exchange for the 3,000 units for free market stuff, they have to make 25% of them available as affordable.

      So this is a public-private partnership with strings attached. Hopefully it goes according to plan and/or the company is held accountable for any bullshit it pulls.

      • begrudgedcarfolk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This will end poorly, I guarantee that in 10 years a successor to Mamdani will alter the deal, screening over New Yorkers in favor of that developer. I hope he’s at least smart enough to not give them the land that the city owns.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, I hope your pessimism is wrong, but can’t dismiss it. The perils of public-private partnerships is a pretty legitimate worry.

          I’m hoping they have enough leverage to have a good, enforceable deal and further hope that succossors will be too afraid of screwing up a popular program.

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Rent control is a lottery, some people randomly get a good deal, but most people continue to be fucked over. This is great if you’re running out of people who can afford to work at Starbucks, but I don’t think it’s fair or progressive.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not even ideal for the people who have rent control.

      Sure, they have rent that’s a lot cheaper than it could be. But, they’re stuck. Maybe their place doesn’t have enough bedrooms. Maybe it’s not near their friends or family. Maybe it’s too big for them. Maybe they hate their neighbours. But, they have rent control, and they lose it if they move.

      Meanwhile, someone else who that apartment would be perfect for has to look elsewhere.

      It’s a bad system, but rent in NYC is so outrageous people will fight for the bad system because they doubt anything better is really possible.

    • fogetaboutit@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think its about dealing with the increase. Most people are already thin in margin, having a guarantee that your expense aren’t growing arbitrarily each year is FAR better than the alternative.