Edit: in Belgium if it gives any clue

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Looks like a standalone thing, has no connections. Tool or toy.

    There’s a section that’s very clearly not the handle, and a section that in stark contrast, is a handle.

    Is made of wood, entirely, and looks quite delicate. For gentler tasks/use.

    It’s long. So it must be to extend reach from the handle part.

    Is entirely curvy without sharp edges, even when looking kind of worn. Designed not to cut or damage.

    Handle is simple and round, rather than having ridges or second axis torque. It is not for twisting.

    Non-handle end is curved and two-ended, with curves that look like for picking and pulling.

    Tips of pulling end are a specific size and surface. Bigger would be stronger but less precise, smaller would be more precise but may risk damage and be weaker. Can imply strength and weight of thing this tool comes into contact with.

    Tool-ends are flat, rather than round/dowels. So the thickness of the tool end is precise, with the amount of strength needed from the added width.

    It also looks in fairly good condition for how old it looks, but simultaneously has even use wear through the finish. Used, not new, indoor tool.

    My best guess is it’s a tool meant for grabbing and pulling fabric or thread, with the secondary ability to push without getting caught, maybe on a large table.

    Going by the era design and simplicity, it’s either from a time or a place with a level of technology that is still relatively simple, a la 1900 USA textiles industry, rather than hyper modern. Or a person, now, who made it themselves and doesn’t need anything fancy, or who likes this style (it does have the dark smooth finish).

    My guess: garment maker’s tool, possibly men’s suits/tailor.

  • Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lacquered light wood, with intricate details. Too delicate to be a gardening tool. Too scuffed and worn to be ornamental. Also it appears upside down, notice the wear at the top.

    That’s all I can see. The rest is speculation from me. Possibly we’re seeing the leg of something, like an armchair or rocking chair? Maybe a part of a large tool, like something to do with weaving or another workbench?

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s a clothes hanger. There’s a central stick with holes where you put your part in.

    My grandma had something similar. She used it as a dildo.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, outdoor clothes hangers still function the same way as a solid concrete base with a deep hole that you can plant a staff in

      My grandad would bury his rod in there from time to time

    • weps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      does it have a hole at the part that’s on the ground? that’s for a hook, to hang it

  • exaybachae@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I think it’s upside down, and probably should have a hook for hanging that’s located in the middle on the curved section, which is shown in contact with the ground.

    But it could also be simply an extention pole for reaching hung garmets that are stored or displayed overhead… Nowadays such extensions are usually just poles with hooks.

  • Dunning Kruger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    My guess is that it is more likely a part of something else, like a piece of furniture, than a standalone tool. As others have pointed out, it were a tool, it would likely show signs of wear on curve or at the tips. Also, the bar tapers as it approaches the rounded part. If the bar were intended to be a handle, then the taper towards the side of impact would be counter-productive, likely reducing the stability and durability of the tool during use.

  • Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    possibly a croupier stick? hard to say, doesn’t look like a typical one but there’s a lot of variance in how they’re made

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s my best guess too, I just wonder why the handle would get thinner at the bottom, not the best choice structurally for a cradle

  • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    You slide the pole up your ass and run around pretending to be a wind-up doll. Then ask random strangers to turn it.