• Beth@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have an advanced degree. I don’t think I know/nor do I want to know everything. But I’m an expert in my field. Outside of that, I like to consume fluffy, shallow media. Because my work is very hard with high burnout and depression, I can’t be super serious all the time. So, I have stayed single after my marriage because it was always “you think you know everything” variants any time I engaged in logic. I don’t want to be run down by people who are supposed to care. I haven’t read classics that often because I simply find them way less interesting than watching JJK. So it’s like being trapped in this space of super serious or super aggrieved potential mates, and as I’m getting older…dying alone is my only sane option.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Man, I don’t get people’s obsession with classics. I’ve tried them and outside of a bit of Mark Twain, I just haven’t enjoyed them.

      • Beth@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I get it to some extent.It is a very different experience to read literature that’s aimed at a well-read, educated cohort rather than a society with a 6th grade reading level. So if people like reading in that way it’s…fine. But making it a litmus test/personality is just a bit absurd. If that was the test I’m surely a fool.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hopefully in 10 years, he will read this and cringe, although it sounds like he’s actively driving away people who think differently and would call him out on his bullshit to help him grow as a person, so maybe not.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In a date, people get to know one-another more intimately through discussion of their interests and beliefs - better than they can through brief social encounters that may have led to the date.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile, I imagine the actual historians and scholars who study and teach of the classical world professionally rarely feel the need to drop lists like this.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If there is no “Dick and Jane” school primer on the list then that guy is a posturing phony!

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sorry do we have medieval Italian political satirists on the table for basic conversion? the crazy thing is, I’ve read books by all the individuals mentioned, and most of it is very old, and very specific to it’s time, and largely entertainment. this is like someone 500 years from now saying they can’t hold a conversation with someone if they don’t have a deep familiaity with the deeper meanings of The Simpsons and Family Guy and how they impacted society.