• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    Somewhat related: Jason’s myth of the Golden Fleece takes him to the east of the Black Sea. It’s very likely that, around the time that the Sahara was green, it was possible to make a boat trip from the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea and from there to the northern part of Afghanistan, what was once Bactria, following the Amu Darya (Oxus) river.

    Another related tidbit: there may be several prehistoric settlements that are now under the sea, due to rising sea levels in some areas. Underwater archaeology is a lot more challenging than doing it in firm, dry soil, thus findings tend to be rarer and more difficult to preserve.

  • Balinares@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    That’s a very, very short time for such a major change. Makes me wonder what currently green ecosystems we take for granted a bit too easily.

    But it also makes me wonder whether a reversal is within human reach. To start with, cheap solar potentially enables desalinization and irrigation at unprecedented scales… What a nice thing to feel optimistic about, if nothing else.

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Chinese solar farms in their deserts suddenly went green due to the constant shade protecting rain water, plus the water from the automated cleaning spray systems. It grew grass, so they put goats there to keep it mowed for free.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    How was the Amazon? From my understanding it gets a substantial amount of benefit from the sands of the Sahara currently.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wait what?

      Did you confuse rivers (Amazon vs Nile) or do the sands of Sahara literally affect ecosystems on another continent?

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Apart from what others have commented on, some of the sand gets deposited in the ocean when it blows across the Atlantic. That sand is eaten by sea life and goes back into that ecosystem. The world is amazing.

        Overall I think making the Sahara more green would be a net positive, but I’m sure there are unforeseen negative consequences for parts of the world.

      • gnu@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Dust from the Sahara blows across over to the Amazon, enough of the stuff makes it across to be a factor when it comes to nutrient supply for the rainforest.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The second one. The sands of the Sahara are vital to the Amazon rainforest. They blow all the way to the Amazon and deposit phosphorus which would totally get washed away without that deposit. The surface of the earth is hyper connected. You only experience yourself as a separate being from the rest of nature just because of the limited awareness we have, not because we are actually independent.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Pretty cool.

          To be fair, I’ve never seen myself as separate from nature, just separate from nature on another literal continent, it boggles the mind that sand can reliably and consistently travel that far.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Green Sahara/Desert Sahara is a cycle that happens.

    I’ve heard people try to claim the garden of eden is a memory of the green sahara, but that’s not provable.

    I also heard it has an effect on animal evolution - the desert acts as a wall, seperating north and south, then goes green and the two regions’ life mingle and compete for a while until it desertification seperates them to evolve independantly of each other until the next green phase.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve heard people try to claim the garden of eden is a memory of the green sahara, but that’s not provable.

      Early civilizations were routinely centered around lush green river valleys, with political strife forcing dissidents out into the dry and sterile periphery. So, I wouldn’t say it’s a memory of a green Sahara so much as a cycle of cultivation and degradation that has informed human storytelling for millennia.

      “Eden” could just as easily be the Indus Valley in modern-day Pakistan. Or the Fertile Crescent of Iraq/Iran. Or the Göbekli Tepe of southeast Turkiye. Or the Nile Delta. Or the modern-day Gaza Strip. Or the rich soils along the slopes of Mount Kenya. Or the bountiful soil of Ukraine. Or yadda yadda yadda.

      Maybe all of these places, with migrating peoples constantly looking for the next Promised Land of Fruit and Honey, settling for a time, and being uprooted again.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah for sure, that’s all possible. Or eden could just be an idealized dream of an agricultural society and not a historical memory at all.

    • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Something about the wobble of the earth’s axis shifting every once in a while. Also the poles can switch too and our sun does it way more often.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s pretty cool. I’ve heard the idea that the Garden of Eden is where the Persian Gulf is now. It supposedly had incredibly rich soil and an immense supply of fresh water until the glaciers over Europe melted and eventually flooded the area.

  • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 days ago

    When you just look at the modern map it’s absurd to think about the number of people that live in Africa north of Sahara. It looks like a wasteland that stretches all the way to the coast.

    Also, with this timeline, it seems plausible that the earliest Egyptian empires may have been around just early enough to actually experience this desertification. No doubt countless tribal peoples had (or have) oral histories describing how their homeland was eaten away by desert.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, with this timeline, it seems plausible that the earliest Egyptian empires may have been around just early enough to actually experience this desertification.

      AfaIk, one theory is that the ancient Egyptians moved from deserting regions in the Sahara (following a now dry branch of the Nile) to Egypt, i.e. the origin of the ancient Egyptian culture is in the Sahara region.

  • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    https://youtu.be/vG1H9Sg4lBM

    They are trying to combat desertification. They’re fighting against a strong feedback loop of dry soil causing water to not be retained, but by using crescent burrows, they’re able to soak water into the soil properly

  • ODGreen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There was once an inland sea called Mega-Chad? Is this one step to discovering the legendary Giga-Chad?

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s an ancient lakebed in Chad that supplies dust that blows across the Atlantic and delivers phosphorus to Amazon rainforests - phosphorus that is needed to support plant growth. Those long-dead organisms are still in the food chain. Life uuh finds a way.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This is the kind of stuff the “don’t tell me what to do with my land” crowd doesn’t know or care about. Everything affects everything on this planet.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Evolution happens in bursts when species are under pressure and a lot of animals are able to make quick adaptations within a few generations. Some animals don’t even need to change because of prior adaptations they never lost and they just thrive.

      For example, if a species had previously adapted to arid conditions but was living in a more hospitable region they don’t tend to lose their ability to handle arid conditions without some kind of pressure. Access to water doesn’t mean they will lose those traits, they just don’t need all the water that is available. If the area turns arid they are not impacted by the lack of water like those that don’t have those traits. Or they might not currently express their genes in a way that causes that adaptation to arid conditions to show up normally, but they don’t necessarily need significant genetic changes to express those traits.

      Look at dogs, who can have massive variation from breeding within a few generations.