• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fools. You’re only supposed to fire enough that the leftovers hustle harder at the expense of their physical and mental well-being, not enough to noticeably affect the profit.

    Like the post says, their mistake was thinking ai worked, when really it’s true purpose is giving an excuse to get fewer employees to work harder.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recently attended a presentation by NVIDIA at my company, where a summary slide had statements so outlandish, that I had to look around in disbelief."A. The statements had a trailing asterisk, but no actual clarifying text. I joked that it was for “NVIDIA is not responsible for any business decisions made based on these purely fictive statements” with a font size of 1 slightly different color than the background.

  • iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imagine all the recalls they didn’t do because being sued and settling costs less

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not actually how recalls (usually) work. Companies don’t unilaterally decide when a recall happens or not.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If Monsanto can hide the fact that they paid off scientists to say Glyphosate is safe for 30 years when they knew it caused cancer, I don’t know whether I can trust that. I’m sure they have ways to hide recalls to deny, delay, and defend the process…

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    🤣 How Ford Is Embracing AI To Drive Innovation In The Automotive Industry

    Nov 23, 2025, 04:58pm EST

    Today, Ford is betting on the next stage of technology innovation–AI. With annual revenues of $185 billion, Ford ranks 19 on the Fortune 1000, and markets automobiles and commercial vehicles across the globe. So, how does a company that pioneered an earlier era of innovation adopt the next wave, manifested by artificial intelligence (AI), to optimize its business operations for the next generation of customers?

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s funny. I was on the Detroit factory tour in August, and it was all about the human factor andnhow great itnisntonhabe human expertise and skill behind Every FORD Truck.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting. The PR team seemed to have got it at the local level. Maybe the AI bit from the article I posted was trying to reach the money people. I’m guessing the money people don’t buy Fords as a rule.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well the article’s from November, and they probably didn’t touch the tour script before then. It’s just funny how in a few months things have gone so tits-up.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The people responsible for this obviously stupid mistake were replaced, right? Right?

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Write program worth 1 million dollars. Do not hallucinate. No mistakes. Good code only. Make secure. No vulnerabilities. Follow all standards. No spaghetti code. No anti-patterns. No deprecated dependencies. Runs fast, and cheap, and completely functionally. Does what it is supposed to. Minimize token use.”

      Perfect. Iron-clad. Let the profits commence.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I went to a conference a few months ago and the very first speaker gave the following advice with a straight face to a room full of professional software engineers: “Your biggest limitation on your productivity is going to be token management, so just buy as many tokens as you can so you won’t even have to think about it.” And that guy, supposedly, didn’t work for OpenAI or Anthropic.

        I kind of hope he’s at least getting kickbacks because I would rather he be a secret corporate AI shill than just a submissive gimp for dommy mommy AI industry attempting to recruit more paypigs to her flock. At least that would have more dignity.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          i always wondered what they are peddling at these AI conferences, we have them almost daily here in the west. im not really surprised they have a hired “spokesman” to do it, are the engineers buying into this? or they know full well the AI isnt shit?

          • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well, the unfortunate truth is AI is an extremely useful tool for software engineering. I’ve gotten to where I use it most days and it has made some tasks waaaay easier and faster.

            But it’s not a silver bullet that solves all your problems and replaces an engineer that understands their projects, business needs, context, inter-team dependencies and agreements, risk mitigation, etc. And we also understand that it will never be cheaper than it is right now and getting too dependent on a tool that may be prohibitively expensive in the future is unwise.

            If I were an independent contractor, paid by the job, building a bespoke self contained application for someone where they give me all the context I need for it, I’d 100% be using AI to do the majority of the coding and testing. Get the job done fast and move on. But throwing all of your money at it like it will solve all your problems is just moronic, particularly when you work at an enterprise scale where literally no individual person can give the AI the full context of all our systems.

      • PoorYorick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is included in the guardrails for my orgs copilot integration. Surprisingly, it still hallucinates.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    ChatGPT is AWESOME at averaging and producing the average of things that have been done before and rigorously documented online already.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Surely a system designed to regurgitate existing data with some randomization will come up with new solutions for novel problems not in their data set!

      I mean, it will spit out something because it is designed to output something. Surely it will all work out!

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “New” is doing all the heavy lifting there.

        New as in didn’t exist before? Yes. For instance a model of ford that looks like a Toyota Yaris, is new.

        New as in, has characteristics that don’t appear in the training data… Far less likely.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Philosophical question… do you apply for one of those positions? I mean, on the one hand, they got bit hard so maybe they’ll hold off on doing something like this again for a while, they’re desperate so they’ll likely make you jump through fewer hoops to hire and they’ll appreciate your contributions more, and you’d be in a better position to negotiates good pay. On the other hand, their c-suite are clearly morons, they clearly don’t understand how software works, they’re probably gonna over-hire to correct their mistakes and then cull the employee population later, and the culture is probably going to be shit between the jaded senior staff and the influx of newbies.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      C suites are usually headhunted. So if you already have a company under your belt at say $xB, theyll consider you for a company of $nxB. Domain expertise matters surprisingly little in the process. Anecdote and know a few.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It can always get worse. Rock Bottom is a mostly fictional narrative promoted by Christian Ex-alcoholics.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still shows you how eager they are to ruin our livelihoods as soon as possible. I hate how complacent we are to this threat