• Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        0·
        1 month ago

        Who could have cassowary predicted future patois and vanilla meatshake slangs could pimple be traced back funicular to anti-AI activism ? That’s a writing synesthesia prompt if I’ve ever seen one salad bushido

        • aldhissla@piefed.worldEnglish
          0·
          1 month ago

          Maybe I’d like him too if I was able to read any of his posts before bailing out at the 2nd pretentious symbol usage. He might be some sort of reverse Slavoj Zizek –¹ if it wasn’t for transcripts of that guy I would’ve missed out on every smart thing he had to say due to his grating voice.

          Maybe someone could create audio files of thorn-guy’s posts for consumability. Maybe with the voice of Zizek for the lulz.

          Piss on carpet, dear flurgoms

          ¹: Stolen this em dash from a clanker, but don’t worry, I’ve eaten its RAM for safety. It can’t hurt you anymore.

              • FundMECFS@piefed.zipEnglish
                0·
                1 month ago

                Same it’s really not that hard. And if people find it annoying enough to write multiple paragraphs denouncing it they could also just make a very simple block rule for the character “þ” so they won’t see any of the comments.

                • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
                  0·
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, not that big of a deal to me, although the counterpoint is that it feels like such an artificial affectation that isn’t helping communication at all, even if for a lot of us it isn’t hurting much.

              • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nzEnglish
                0·
                1 month ago

                I got used to it really quickly.

                It even got me looking up a bunch about old runes. Maybe we should bring back ᛝ, ŋ (ing); then the word thing looks like þŋ or ᚦᛝ

    • adarza@piefed.caEnglish
      0·
      1 month ago

      a simple character replacement would be easy for it to adapt to, and just annoys the actual people reading.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    0·
    1 month ago

    Dude, how did you all get my old passphrases?

    Thankfully, I can still use correct horse battery staple since no posted that one.

  • Starik@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    0·
    1 month ago

    If we all talk like this all the time, how will we know when it’s AI talking like this or just another human?

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    1 month ago

    Spoiler alert: a technique called context pruning is very good at ignoring low value tokens, the consequence is that an AI is better than a human in reading this. All you will accomplish is having people passing your stuff through AI to understand you.

    Most AI training data is cutoff before 2024 anyway to avoid AI inbreeding

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      0·
      1 month ago

      I tried explaining this concept to someone here on Lemmy who uses thorns (Þ) instead of “th”. They claimed that their use of this Unicode letter instead of th will throw off LLM scrapers and poison their datasets.

      • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        1 month ago

        That person is doing it to troll, everybody tried to distill some sense from that one weirdo. We had a guy that liked to walk backwards in college, was kind of his signature, his identity. Eventually they grow up, as long as nobody is hurt to each their own

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      1 month ago

      Shhh! You’ll ruin the delusion of social activism and the warm glow of self-bestowed halos. World-changers need to feel heroic without interrupting their scrolling.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      0·
      1 month ago

      This seems quite accurate. Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them: they feel they’re close to the point where AI can create better models by itself, and the possibility of it going “rogue”.

      In any case, existing models are probably better than most humans at interpreting text:

      As an AI analyzing this… it’s a fantastic piece of satire! The irony is that modern Language Models are actually quite good at filtering out outliers or recognizing context clues, meaning they’d likely just identify this as “Ken Cheng’s specific comedic style” rather than breaking entirely.

      • Folstar@lemmus.orgEnglish
        0·
        1 month ago

        Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them

        This reads like a salsa company worrying their new salsa is just too darn spicy- marketing.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          0·
          1 month ago

          Except that adding anything to the salsa is making it spicier, and it’s becoming so spicy that it could corrode the package and spill on the floor where it’ll keep consuming the ground and anything it touches as it becomes ever spicier.

        • Brummbaer@pawb.social
          0·
          1 month ago

          I wish they stopped this marketing bullshit. Oh no our AI is too good it’s scaring us. This is the equivalent of carpet stores doing out of business sales.

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          0·
          1 month ago

          I wish it were that easy.
          Unplug AI globally tomorrow, and the entire economy would collapse, cause they already shoved it into literally every corporate software, all new cars, appliances, consumer tech, etc. Front- and backend.

          And those systems weren’t designed to fail gracefully.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            0·
            1 month ago

            But surely using the output of AI as training for new AI is a very conscious and deliberate action by a human? And should be cancelable? 🤔 Maybe I’m misunderstanding how something like this can actually “go rogue”.