Brummbaer

Freud and anything that came out of it was and is still a talk-therapy for rich people.

If you were working class you had the option of self medication with drugs or being put into an insane asylum, if you broke down.

So yes, Freud is still relevant, if you can afford it basically.

What they don’t know is that Trump will be gone one day and the whole AI hype will come crashing down.

I’m pretty sure Intel will not exist anymore in 2-3 years.

Isn’t that how winter wheat works.

edit: let me add an /s here, because I’m afraid people might not get that this is a joke.

As if TV some shows follow the rules of theatrical plays, coincidence or conspiracy?

You can’t see it, because it goes to another school.

I wish they stopped this marketing bullshit. Oh no our AI is too good it’s scaring us. This is the equivalent of carpet stores doing out of business sales.

Same here, I have been doing that for around 20 years now too and I started out with postfix and a list of vmails in a text file.

I wonder where this myth comes from. People host way more out there stuff themselves, but somehow email is too scary …

These kind of scholarships are usually awarded after obtaining a degree. I’m pretty sure these kids haven’t published many papers.

They form spores and spores can withstand a lot of radiation.

You can change that, but there is a maximum time when it just kills the job.

I’m stupid and I don’t read more than headlines. I’ll let it stand so you can make fun of me …

The more I read about it the more I think US law is vibe based.

When we discover that this is basically religion, a lot of people will be really confused and in denial.

We should also give both players cars, more efficient than running.

I’ll call that Auto Polo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto_polo

I wish I didn’t honestly.

Better idea yet, just carry the ball in your hand, much easier and can be done by one person…

Meanwhile the US is organising a separatist movement to destabilise CA, but tell me more on why China is the problem here.

I know what you mean, and it makes sense, but there is something in me that wants to think, that a majority of people aren’t this naïve and fall for this.

Maybe I’m naïve here in the end…

I totally misunderstood your comment, sorry.

Most people won’t see it and if this can’t be put under the rug you will have a lot of newspapers who will happily come up with excuses why this was necessary.

The constant stream of “Muslims equals terrorists, most Palestinians are Muslims, therefore they are terrorists” helps a lot there.

And people want to be on the majority side which they identify as “good”.

Also you shouldn’t underestimate the fear factor. If people admit that this was unnecessary police violence, they suddenly realise that nothing is stopping the police of doing that to them. So to calm their anxiety they will either say " immigrants, they shouldn’t be here in the first place" or “there must be more to that story, that we don’t see/know”.

I’m trying to put that as neutral as I can.

How do these people think politics work. I mean do they think that voting for a person or a party grants them some kind of personal (parasocial) relationship?

I’m pretty sure that exists outside the US also, but I have only seen that coming from the US so far.