• Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Posts like this are so ignorant because they’re based on the false premise that English was made to be the global language, when it’s not. It was made as a result of the mixing of Germans, Scandinavians, Celts, and French people on a gloomy isolated island in the corner of Europe for thousands of years. It’s a language that was evolved by those people, and thus it contains a lot of their linguistic quirks coming together.

    Every single language has quirks like this. For example, I also speak Arabic, and people are always shocked when I tell them that an Arabic speaker from Iraq and an Arab speaker from Morocco cannot understand each other because Arabic dialects are basically different languages. THey’re only unified by standard Arabic, which most Arabic speakers don’t use in their day to day lives. It’s basically a language that’s only used to communicate with other Arabs.

    English only got to where it is because of a unique situation in history where the language was used by not one, but two global hegemons. Not only that but those hegemons happened to be the most of the powerful in history, and they ruled back to back. That’s what spread and cemented English into the global language it is today.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I still don’t understand though why Europe so many languages, a good chunk of it was in the Roman empire so you would have thought that they would all have a single unified language as a result of that but even in the Mediterranean there’s different languages.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      You didn’t address a single thing from the original post.

      It was highlighting how English is a very quirky language. You can explain it, obviously there are reasons why, but it doesn’t change the factual observation that English is a uniquely inconsistent language.

      Most languages have some sort of academic body that dictates the correct usage of the language, and occasionally push for adjustments that resolve these inconsistencies. English does not, it’s a crowd sourced effort with the results being what we see today.

      Many countries and languages share similar backgrounds to English - invasion by foreign peoples, large migrations, etc - yet they’ve settled most of their background into a consistent ruleset - there’s always exceptions and irregularities, but not to the level of English.

      One of the largest sources of inconsistencies was the “Great Vowel Shift”, along with the invention of the printing press at roughly the same time, which standardized a spelling that didn’t reflect the massive ongoing changes in pronunciation.

      This is a fascinating topic, but accusing others of ignorance for pointing out something that is a fact, is in itself ignorance.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        This is complete nonsense. All languages are organic and evolve naturally. There’s no academic body that controls any langauge, that’s not how languages work. What exists is institutional bodies that try to break down and explain languages into rules and patterns, they don’t actually dictate the direction of the language. English also has such institutions by the way. This idea that English is uniquely inconsistent or uncontrolled is not true. Arabic, for example, is just as quirky, inconsistent, and uncontrolled. That’s just human speech.

  • gnufuu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’ve always found it funny how single vowels are pronounced in English, e.g. when you say the alphabet.

    Any other language:

    A, E, I, O, U

    English:

    Ayy, I (as in “mirror”), Eye, Ouu, Yuu

      • glibg10b@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s not just English. Afrikaans: Ah, 'ere, ee, <the diphthong in “whip”>, <not present in any English words>

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        This is why I had a problem with “phonics” as a teaching philosophy.

        You have “ph” sometimes teaming up to cosplay as a freaking “f”. And that’s one of the easier rules. It’s all broken from the get-go.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          My favourite word is pterodactyl

          It’s got a silent letter at the beginning, and then a silent o in the middle, and an invisible a, which you pronounce but don’t type, and then a silent c, before going back to some sort of sanity for the last three letters. Who decided that’s how it should be spelt?

          We already had the word Terra so why did they have to go spell this version Ptero

  • LSNLDN@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    All the good will that I had had had had no effect on my disdain for this language

    • joby@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Careful, though: reading (past tense of ‘to read’) doesn’t rhyme with Reading (place name)

      • dave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        And leading (being in front) doesn’t rhyme with leading (the metal on a roof).

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Lol I did get it immediately after, but my instant thought was wait, read and lead don’t rhyme?

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Qu’est-ce que c’est ?

    That’s the ubiquitous “what’s that” in French. All languages are evil to newcomers.

    You’re welcome.