Oh I remember that place where the AI got trained for this.
Silkroad?
No, there is (or was) a site that had detailed information about pretty much any mind altering drug, as well as a forum where people discussed their experiences with doses and combinations.
I’m completely blanking on the name, though.
There’s also psychonaut wiki
That’s the one!
Blast from the past
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Psychology student completely failed to recognize confirmation bias
Psychology students tend to be people who have psychological problems themselves that they try to figure out
“Psychology student” means 90% of first year university students.
Yea, what about internet user believing a meme in a hate forum
What about people who can’t be bothered to check if something actually happened and just cynically dismiss it?
Lololol. This fool was robotrippin, I’ve done a lot of drugs, a lot. There’s good trips, “bad trips” then robotripping. Hands down a horrendous experience that nobody should ever do. See if psilocybin and other natural things were legal, we wouldn’t have students dying on shit like this
I always thought it was pleasant. Kinda like MXE. Have to be careful to get the ones with no other active ingredients though.
As with most and im sure you know, everyone will react differently and have different interactions with halucinagens
My point is I don’t buy into any of it unless they release the entire chat history vs sniping snippets
no no, you need to blindly accept that this happened, or else you are “being contrarian” lol.
There is only one permitted opinion and you shouldn’t need to get mixed up with bullshit capitalist ideas such as “evidence”.
lol fuck that guy.
Then just don’t interact with it, because you as a member of the public don’t need to know the ins and outs of this guy’s life, so you’re never going to believe anything anyway.
As is, you just come across as being a contrarian for its own sake, or some kind of weird voyeur for dead people.
I just said the most common sense thing and you don’t like that. In all these stories they should include the chat history. You sound like a MAGA here for a reason. You should explore what causes MAGA to make similar arguments
Lol dork
Might sound cold, but this is really just a Darwin award. Yeah, the guardrails also suck, but what a dumbass.
People got mad at me for pointing out this is the case when people die because they listen to an AI chatbot, but it’s true. AI 100% needs more regulation, but introduce any new tool to everyone all at once, and some idiots will use it to remove themselves from the gene pool. If you sent everyone in the world a thin, 2in rod of inert iron, there would be a handful of people who would figure out a way to kill themselves with it.
Sad… real sad.
Alexa, play Mambo no. 5
chatGPT is doing humanity a service here
Post needs text alternative.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:
- usability
- we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
- text search is unavailable
- the system can’t
- reflow text to varied screen sizes
- vary presentation (size, contrast)
- vary modality (audio, braille)
- accessibility
- lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
- some users can’t read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
- users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
- systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices
- web connectivity
- we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source
- we can’t explore wider context of the original message
- authenticity: we don’t know the image hasn’t been tampered
- searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
- fault tolerance: no text fallback if
- image breaks
- image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.
Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
- usability
LETS GO FULL TRIPPY MODE
FULL TRIPPY MODE??!
I just remembered there’s a series of Estonian children’s books where the protagonist’s imaginary friend (a clown) is named Tripp.
At one point they go shopping for rulers and Tripp suggests that straight ones are boring, they should get curved ones.
Quick summary from a bookstore website says they also go cloud surfing and visit a dream rental place. That’s right, it’s basically Blockbuster but for dreams.
The best part is that I’m pretty sure the author wouldn’t have known of the term “trip” given the lack of western culture in the soviet union in the 70s so the name of said sidekick is a coincidence most likely. Even though if you read the book as an adult, it sure sounds like the main characters are tripping all the time.
ChatGPT helping speeding up natural selection. I like that.
You’re absolutely right – that was a fatal dose. ✨
“You want to fucking kill yourself? What an insightful and thought provoking idea!”
Easy there Camus
Camus J’ai pété
banning kids from social media is definitely easier than holding billionaire slop machines and billionaire csam generators accountable /s
But won’t somebody please think of the billionaires.
I’ll just leave it here:
https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-health/
(TL;DR OpenAI rolls out a section within ChatGPT specifically meant to answer medical questions)
Yeah yeah. Fuck ai. But this idiot, a human, with a brain, made the decision to do this. But sure, blame the software and not the person, who used what brain they had, to do this.
Blaming ai for everything is becoming the new video games are bad, electric lights are scary, etc. mentality. A human, with a brain, made the choice to take the drugs and do what a computer told them to do.
People will still blame it on the LLM despite the many warnings and stuff
That’s completely on the user
People will still blame it on the LLM despite the many warnings and stuff
That’s completely on the user
I’m writing a book about drug use that needs accurate advice or say “theoretically” and it will tell you anything. Unfortunately it must already be high because it will give you made up advice.
deleted by creator
The problem is that this advice was made up by no-one. It’s like that perennially relevant IBM memo that says something like “A computer cannot be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision”
