• thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I always respected that Canada is open to almost everyone…

    Except if you have a DUI

    I knew a lady that was a Canadian citizen but lived and worked in Seattle. She got a DUI in the US and they won’t let her go back into Canada until she completes the long and expensive process that they require for DUI offenders.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s ridiculous. You can deny someone a driving licence, but you can’t deny them entry to the country they’re a citizen of.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dunno, DUI is serious, you could kill someone. Maybe it is a long and expensive process to make sure people will remember it and not drive while being drunk?

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          until she completes the long and expensive process that they require for DUI offenders.

          Sounds like there’s a path to forgiveness, it’s just not cheap or easy. Which, why should it be? She drove under the influence and could have killed someone.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I always figured it was a good line in the sand telling some Americans, they are not welcome

        drunk driving is serious and I respect that they treat it as such

        • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Looking at their rules for it, it actually seems kinda fucked: One bad choice years ago bars you for life unless you are wealthy enough to go through their process and hire lawyers, it’s a even crime to try and enter, but that is definitely not a widely known fact, so even though someone might have paid their dues and even been completely sober for years, they’re still fucked unless they’re well off.

          I get wanting to protect people and stop dangerous driving but effectively banning someone for life if they made a mistake and happen to be poor seems a bit unfair. You can bet your ass rich people have all sorts of ways around this that completely circumvent the system anyhow on top of all that.

          As usual, it’s another regulation that disproportionately affects poor people who are unable to afford proper legal representation to begin with (and are more likely to be falsely convicted of a DUI in the first place).

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably could have left out the words “without due process” because they should not be throwing people into an El Salvadorian gulag.

      • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk it kinda feels like the implication is that if you have due process, then this would be okay. I’m firmly in the camp that nobody should be shipped to an El Salvador Gulag for any reason

  • frida@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    this isnt a shitpost. this is a shit fucking post. fuck ai. how can people still not tell, its so damn obv and uglyy 😭😭

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s always so washed out, every. single. AI. IMAGE. regardless of style they all look washed out and flat. there’s zero vibrant colors for anything. One of them just gorged on this “trend” and all the rest of them followed suite eating the slop.

      It’s gotten to the point now where you don’t even need to look at the inaccuracies with something, you just need to look at the colors to tell if it’s AI or not.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it’s the exact same style used in almost all ai slop comics lately. you can tell by face alone; it’s almost identical in all of them, even with different features (like facial hair).

        • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So these are 2 images I asked AI for, which are admittedly terrible. But beyond that, I’m unsure of the distinguishing features that pegs it as AI. Any guidance (other than never make these images again - for obvious reasons)?

          • uzay@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you look at the details, there are signs, like structures or geometry that don’t make sense or aren’t aligned properly. Things an artist with intent would have no reason to draw that way.

          • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            In the First image, there’s a yellow tint that chatgpt absolutely loves to always apply to everything. White is never white

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            There isn’t a real way to tell anymore other then using ai detector (there are a few free websites). What people are referring to is the specific style chatgpt uses by default when making comics. They are currently the best for generating comics with text, but they overlay their style so the hate isn’t directed towards them. We are very close to having open source tools that can generate full comic pages with text in whatever style asked of it.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            no, I don’t know what you used but this is not what I’m talking about. you can find inconsistencies, colors that don’t make sense, a whole set of issues but that’s AI in general.

            what I’m talking about a very specific style that vaguely apes the ligne claire style of comics, adding an old paper filter and completely lacking soul. they can have zero “errors” and still be recognizable because they are so exact and eerily similar in their style. there’s a difference between a person drawing in a particular style and a machine emulating it.

            You can see these comics on Lemmy from time to time, although it might be getting less common since it gets negative comments every time. I’m pretty sure they come from one particular comic generator. or possibly multiple that use the same underlying model.

            They have the same soulless faces, usually very limited and recognizable facial expressions. i recently saw one with dinosaurs and even they had the exact facial expressions that I’ve seen in other AI slop comics. they also have the same faux lettering font for text.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think, ChatGPT usually produces those. Very recognisable, and remind me of one comic artist that also makes characters with eerie smiles, simplified style, but also very dark humour and traumas. Can’t remember their name, though.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It seems to spit this out whenever you ask for comic style. I couldn’t tell you exactly what it is.

      • Rinn@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        In this case:

        • this comic artstyle is very characteristic of AI, down to the line weight, facial expression (these soulless eyes and smile), and how the character is positioned;
        • the bus has no door;
        • the picture has a yellow-ish tint, which has been plaguing certain AI image generators ever since the AI Ghibli trend. They likely overtrained their slop machines on Studio Ghibli works and various other “cozy” artstyles/pictures.
    • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can’t even figure out what I’ve noticed about these things, and it pisses me off that it rings a false positive whenever I read newspaper comics

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Line weight. The round eyes. The color. The exact same smile. Same angles to the viewer. 45 or direct… There are so many telltale signs.

        • unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          When everyone starts using the same style, it’s either everyone’s hiring the same artist (unlikely) or they used AI.

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sure. That’s an AI mistake. I was naming general thematic and design attributes, but composition and content also inform the aware viewer.

          • Sergio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            it’s a trap! They throw you in the bus and weld the door shut! #theGulagIsTheBus

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There is a mathematic perfection that our brains easily recognize even if we can’t articulate it. The human brain is unmatched at the task of visual pattern recognition.

        • argarath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I see now. I was still on the fence about it, thinking it could also be someone’s drawing trying to emulate those travel agencies ass style, but the 45° or direct angle at the camera is so true

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Honestly the silver lining with all this is how innately obvious it is what it is currently.

        Literally just reeks of the same level of effort as someone making a meme out of clipart or one of those boomers that uses that fancy Facebook status feature.

        If you need to generate a hero image to make your witty tweet good enough to share, maybe go back to the drawing board

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s crazy is I instantly clocked it as AI slop just from the thumbnail, and I’m not even wearing my glasses.

      • ___qwertz___@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My conspiracy theory is that OpenAI makes their generated images easy to recognize so that they can filter them out for learning when scraping pages.

      • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It just all has a kind of bland sameyness to it all that once you see it you can spot it immediately in subsequent images.

    • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      In a different AI comic conversation someone used the term “slop sepia” and I hope it catches on.

      The term, not the slop

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you insist on posting Ai slop outside of the dedicated Ai communities please at least tag it so people can filter Ai slop out.

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is visiting the same as illegally comming to a place without authorisation ? Brainwashing is strong in this one

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Brainwashing is strong in this one

      Yes it is, but eventually you’ll open your eyes and stop falling for the bullshit you’re being sold. Or you’ll ignore it until you get effected by it, just like conservatives always do.

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is visiting the same as illegally comming to a place without authorisation ? B

      The way of establishing which is which is the due process.

      • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lmao When I visit some place I take contact with pH embassy and see how I can legaly visit that place. It s not me coming there without any paper and trough any mean and then saying I was visiting

  • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This makes it sound like sending you to concentration camps with due process is fair game lol

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    We will, however, throw you into an El Salvadorian gulag with due process!

    :/

        • NoFun4You@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Would you rather a gulag committee or no gulag committee lol. Ppl want children to spend their whole life’s in prison for making mistakes before their brain is fully developed… I’d say a committee is a much better compromise than letting agents like that represent immigration-or whatever the fuck they’re doing in the us-to make decisions.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The thought of just not having a gulag, of taking that option off the table entirely, genuinely does not occur to you?

            Assuming a true statement, the last line in OP adds people to the torture prison

  • swagmoney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    ai slop aside… wasn’t it Canadian contractors that built ‘Alligator Auschwitz’?