The Democratic National Committee determined it failed to follow internal rules in February. Separately, Hogg’s plans to back primaries against incumbent Democrats stirred controversy.
No, they’re not. There are plenty of sifferences. Most are superficial, but they’re differences nontheless. I don’t know why you can’t comprehend that there’s more than one path to the same goal.
I did not say that.nor so I endorse that philosophy. My state is solidly blue and doesn’t have enough electoral votes to affect the election in any meaningful way. I’ve been voting third party for almost 30 years because it’s the only possible way for my presidential vote to matter at all. It’s actually impressive how stupid and wrong your strawman argument is in this case.
No, they’re not. There are plenty of sifferences. Most are superficial, but they’re differences nontheless. I don’t know why you can’t comprehend that there’s more than one path to the same goal.
If the same goal is towards fascism, then they are the same.
No, that means they have the same goal, not that they are identical. There are many paths one could take towards that goal.
So keep voting blue no matter who anyway even if the end goal is fascism. Gotcha.
I did not say that.nor so I endorse that philosophy. My state is solidly blue and doesn’t have enough electoral votes to affect the election in any meaningful way. I’ve been voting third party for almost 30 years because it’s the only possible way for my presidential vote to matter at all. It’s actually impressive how stupid and wrong your strawman argument is in this case.
But your argument, they are not the same in spite of working towards the same goal. I don’t think you realise your contradictions.
“I am walking to the grocery store”.
“I am taking a bus to the grocery store”.
“I am using an experimental teleporter to warp to the grocery store”.
Idk why it seems to be so mind blowing to you, but things can be different even if they end up at the same place