Where is the accountability from the public? Every redneck 100 mi from me was screaming about her damn emails. They probably didn’t even understand why they were outraged, but the man on the FoX nEwS was angry about it so I am too. They say that the don’t trust the government for legitimate topics like vaccines, and taxes and then when the government gives you a huge reason to actually be concerned, it gets ignored
The hypocrisy knows no bounds…
I’m not sure that pointing out the hypocrisy is even useful. I’m nearing 40 and “but it’s okay when we do it” has always been a core tenant of conservatism. They don’t give a shit that they’re hypocrites, they don’t care, I’ve boxed them in on it before and it always just boils down to “it’s okay for us because I said so”. I think it’s maybe more useful to move past the identification of hypocrisy and start engaging in conversations about accountability. That is, conversations about hypocrisy without conversations about what kind of accountability you’d like to see are moot. So, let’s move past “can you believe this shit? But her emails? Do you feel like the hypocrites you are yet?” to “your boy did something fucking stupid. I don’t care about your excuses, fire him.”
That’s true! We just assume that by pointing out the naughty behavior Someone will Do Something because honest people expect honest reactions.
Dishonest people cannot have honest reactions, their words mean nothing, they respond only to personal suffering and nothing else.
It’s almost like that party has no values and sees everything only through the lens of political leverage.
Nothing on Hillary Clinton’s server was classified at the time it was put on the server. Some items were subsequently reclassified to the lowest level above Unclassified.
So there’s really no comparison between the two situations. It stinks of bothsidesism for the journalist to even mention it. A better contrast is between screeching outrage at nothing, versus the current sneering complacency about a major security fuck-up, though I’m sure it pales with what Trump is sharing with Russia and what he’s waving around in front of his cronies to brag about what he knows.
Nothing on Hillary Clinton’s server was classified at the time it was put on the server
Some items were subsequently reclassified to the lowest level above Unclassified.
Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
So there’s really no comparison between the two situations.
I agree. I just wanted to correct the record and to highlight that a normal government employee would have been fired for what Hillary did.
In my opinion the most relevant commonality is the hypocrisy of all the involved parties. Hillary had sent out a notice to the entire State Department saying to only use official communication platforms, and then did the opposite as if she thinks she’s above the rules.
Then these Republicans who condemned the actions also used a non-official platform.
Here we go with the “Democrats can do no wrong…” speech…
Ah, cool, another account to block.
Bye!
Blocking them doesn’t silence them, it’s just plugging your own ears. Call them out instead.
They want the attention. I have no interest in giving it to them.
Any government business should be conducted solely on government equipment, classified or unclassified. What the poster is saying is that the two don’t compare, what Hillary did was conduct government business on a private server, what the trump administration officials did was share sensitive compartmented information (SCI) on a private app.
Both actions were wrong, it’s just that revealing SCI information is far far worse.
Where did it say that?
This is the projection we were talking about.
Please explain how you can read “that one thing everyone was mad at wasn’t as bad as they said” to “they’re perfect angels who never do anything bad” without being either braindead or a pathetic partisan hack
Ah but you see it’s a very logical and reasonable conclusion. Allow me to explain.
ahem
DEMOCRATS BAD
Just ignore/block them. They just want the attention.
Also the disappearing texts are a concern. There’s not much mention of that. And now you have to wonder, how many other conversations have been held there, and with who?
Disappearing texts?
Similar to WhatsApp you can set limits on how long to keep a message
Yeah the main point of using signal to get around the presidential records act, which is very illegal
And FOI. It’s sketchy AF.
Summary:
- a journalist was invited
- half an hour before the first takeoff, the takeoff times of planes, drones and cruise missiles were shared
- it was mentioned that an individual terrorist is on sight and his location known
Sadly, none of them will be jailed, like a lay person would be for disclosing military secrets.
However, I would advocate for punishing them with having a mandatory nanny appointed to oversee them for 4 years.
According to Sun Tzus art of war, someone who is that stupid should be put to death.
lock them up!
It’s always Opposite Day with these clowns GOP. The blame finger is always pointing at them.
Lock him up!
And here several days later they are still trying to gaslight everyone into believing that it never happened.
The takeaway is that Signal is a bloody good app to use.
Sounds like it’s pretty easy to add the wrong people to your chat.
People are usually the weakest link.
Oops I buttdialed top secret information
It’s no different from many other chat apps. Select the contacts you want in the group.
There’s no issue with the app, it’s actually among the most secure. The issue is the meatbag behind the thumbs selecting who to put in the chat.
I’ve never had any issues by adding the wrong people to a group, personally 🙂.
Is that the takeaway?
For the reporter it was.
🧈 👨 s
Leonardo DiCaprio pointing at a tv
It’s almost as if they never actually cared about the server but rather were just using it to score points. Not at all like, you know, absolutely everything else.
HUNTER BIDENS LAPTOP
:surprised-pikachu:
It’s almost like libs don’t actually care about this recent leak but are also just using it to score points.
The lack of self-awareness is stunning.
People do care about the leaaks, but also how ironically this situation is compared to the ‘but what about her emails’ situation in the past.
imagine getting banned from c/noncredibledefense, how pathetic do you have to be for that to happen
I laughed way too hard at this. Its only been a month or two since I switched to Lemmy and already I’m getting the injokes.
Ah, I knew there was a good reason I have you tagged as ‘fucking moron’
Which lemmy app does that?
Boost does.
Now I have him tagged as Fucking Moron too.
Thanks for the tip!
Update: wow, this is really helpful!
Well damn, I was looking for a method to do it on PC lol.
The Voyager app supports blocking.
Just block them.
At Bluesky it’s been astoundingly effective for getting the fucking morons to find somewhere else to waste their time.
I appreciate your advice :)
I disagree with blocking them. Call them out on it once and then don’t engage with any further responses
Lock. Them. Up.
