• Jolly Platypus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The 2A is there for a reason. This is the first time it’s legitimately been needed.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The 2A is there for a reason.

      That was to maintain a state-sponsored militia to put down slave insurrections and to catch escaped slaves.

    • doug@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Unfortunately the majority of its users appear to all be brownshirts in waiting.

        • doug@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah that’s why I made sure to say “majority,” but even that could just be my confirmation bias since the loudest 2A supporters are right wingers; I’ve never looked into how many left leaning people are also gun-owners but yes, I know they exist (and I have been thinking about becoming one of them).

          • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Left wing gun owners don’t brag about their guns in general. For the most part the left wing really really abhors violence, until they don’t, then it’s door to door firing squads for the whole family. Because by the time you reach that point, they’ve been violently forced into organizing a reaction.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Again, if the second amendment was ANY threat to the govenrment, it would have been repealed.

      Again, what are your assault rifles, your NRA training, and your screaming of “WILDCATS” going to do against drones? Or a police force that literally have tanks?

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Tanks need fuel, drivers, and ways to cross rivers, drones have limited range and don’t see inside buildings. Roads, power, and water are pressure points. You don’t stand up to a stronger military force, you make it too expensive to operate, never being there when sudden things happen. That’s why IEDs were the biggest problem in Iraq and Afghanistan. No one to chase, everyone is a suspect, all enforcement has to operate at maximum alert, always.

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I mean, our government’s track record fighting guerrilla insurgencies isnt spotless.

        I’m not sure it’ll happen, but civilians could absolutely be a significant threat to both LE and military regardless of the gap in arms/tech.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I mean, our government’s track record fighting guerrilla insurgencies isnt spotless.

          Ah. I see. So you and your militia buddies are going to escape to the mountain caves of… Chicago?

          Also, we hunted and murdered many terrorist cells based on something as simple as a magazine on a desk. There is an entire genre of Influencer built around playing “geo guesser” to track things to within a 5 meter radius based off a single picture.

          And that all ignores just how many cameras there are in this country. They won’t need to wait until a satelite is overhead to have Abby and McGee hack your location. They’ll just run a simple algorithm that will track you via all the traffic cameras and then tell Ubiquiti and Google to give them doorbell cameras to track you back to your house in the suburbs. This is why basically anyone with half a brain is strongly opposed to police chases. All it does is escalate the situation and increase risk to civilians. Instead? Just track them and roll up on them when they go to sleep that night.

          At which point, we are back to what the “right to bear arms” actually gets you. Time for a bit of a history lesson!

          Back when the Constitution was written, muskets were the name of the game with the new hotness being rifled barrels that gave a bit more precision to those. And, as America learned first hand, a well trained military could borderline handle an order of magnitude more poorly trained farmers (the opening battles of the US Revolutionary War are actually really fascinating for how unstoppable the Redcoats were). So if a group got too uppety? Send in the military and they would break.

          Fast forward to The Wild West where people had revolvers, lever actions, and even some semi auto weaponry. That was incredibly useful for letting law enforcement ignore large swathes of the country (“You have the right to bear arms. You defend yourself”) and had the added benefit of giving Pinkertons and the like legal justification. And, again, when people got too uppety: Heavily armed “US Marshalls” and the military were called in to put them down.

          There WAS a brief window where small groups of (generally military trained) individuals with Thompsons and BARs were a significant threat. But shortly thereafter the modern AR-15 style assault rifles were “invented” and trained military (and snipers) once again could dominate any actual clash.

          Because people think this is going to be Die Hard where they walk up to the leader of the fascists and exchange quips before quick drawing, killing one guy, and winning the war. The reality is that we are looking at police tanks ramming through walls, buildings getting riddled with machine gun fire, and explosives raining down if things get too “risky”.

          People think of when those rednecks took over Malheur a few years back and think that is how it will play out. That only worked because it was white people that the cops like. What they SHOULD look at is things like Waco where the government decided “Fuck it, we ball” and unloaded and massacred dozens of children while showing just how little the second amendment matters.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            There is an entire genre of Influencer built around playing “geo guesser” to track things to within a 5 meter radius based off a single picture.

            And they’re full of shit. Don’t believe everything you see online. Not even this.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I’m not sure if you know this, but the left looks the same as the right. And as Canadians. If you think they will be able to find all of us, let alone kidnap and kill us all, you’re sorely mistaken. People can perform partisan actions and disappear into mist. Sure they find sole actors now after a while and a lot of concerted effort, but now imagine there are a few hundred of those events all over the country? If you think they would win or even be able to fight a true guerilla war on American soil, you’re delusional. Even with the brown shirts who would be willing to help, you’d have just as many that refuse and possibly switch sides.