• Aneb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Easy solution! Just make a profile before the photo verification was implemented

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t care if kids see porn.

    If that’s the worst thing ever, justifying this invasion of privacy, whoop de shit. Let 'em.

    There’s a lot worse on the internet. There’s a lot worse on daytime television. Blood and guts and cults and informercials. Desirable crude entertainment is obviously not worth locking down the internet. I mean for fuck’s sake, at least with “four horsemen” excuses, like terrorism and money laundering, people agree that those things are bad.

    • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s absolutely reprehensible that you think it’s okay for a child to see an infomercial

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I was never exposed to porn on the internet as a child, outside of advertisements and typing website names wrong. I never looked for it either, if a child is actively seeking it out, its up to a parent to deal with it. People should stop making laws to protect bad parents.

      • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        its up to a parent to deal with it

        What a nice cherry on top of the hypocrisy pie. The party of “personal responsibility” and “small government” is perfectly happy when government is used to regulate sexuality and help out the irresponsible parents that don’t want to spend time monitoring their children’s Internet usage. Now young teens are going to learn how to use VPNs or just find the shadier sites that don’t give a shit about U.S. state laws.

        Both of which would be adequately addressed by parents learning how to use the tools that are probably already built into their router.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The thing is that by now, plenty of adults grew up watching porn when they were minors, and know that this hasn’t been harmful to them… so why are we even still getting laws like that, shouldn’t voters and their representatives know better by now…

    • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yes, you’re right. But that doesn’t fit with their “think of the children” moral compass. Which isn’t even pointing the correct direction, but good luck convincing them of that.

      I feel like my compass analogy isn’t the best, but eh.

  • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Soon they’ll start recording you jerking it to cross reference with previous sessions as identity confirmation.

    • Goun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well, they know what parts of what videos you watch, your favorite keywords, time/days patterns, location, I’d say they can train AI on that data

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        ChatGPT will be drawing conclusions from the data like “Subject is likely a tipthumbing twister (86.436% confidence) with content dependent high frequency intervals (94.738% confidence)”

        It’ll analyze things like minor mouse movements, microphone audio, and use that wifi radar trick.

  • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This will never be removed. There will only ever going to be more types of websites that have to use this

    • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I wonder if that’ll end up being true. I’d guess these constituents represent voters that watch porn at least as much on average as anyone else. I’m going to go ahead and guess above average. They might get tired of this and push for change. But I’m also admittedly less educated on how our political system works than I should be and might be overestimating how much influence Florida Man has because he’s disgruntled at having to jump through hurdles to fap.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        The problem is that it’s political suicide to be the “pro sex, pro smut” politician. Consistently the counters to anti sexual freedom laws have come from the courts. By saying “age verification on porn has gone too far,” a politician more or less accepts that their entire campaign is going to be about this. And when that happens the right has the advantage because they have the ability to be short and quippy as they misrepresent you and play to emotions.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          This is the same reason japan still blurs genitals. Someone decades ago got that law passed and now no one is gonna campaign on changing it. Theoretically it should be easier to do in a parliamentary system (a few years back there was a single member of congress elected from the “no more tv taxes” party), but even still it’d be tough. In the states it has zero chance.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHK_Party

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Guilty Canadian Admission:

    In my teens I lived in Brockville Ontario near Ogdensburg New York and watched a lot of US channels. The Star Spangled Banner came on at the beginning of the broadcast day for some channels.

    For many years, I thought the first line was “Jose can you see”

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Hey the cum can be anywhere. It doesn’t say “only” a picture of your face.

      For example, why not put a mirror on a table. Put your ID next to the mirror. Look down into the mirror and ready your camera. Then, slap your dick right on the table next to the ID. Finally, banana for size.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      That sounds like a chicken and egg problem. How is the cum getting on the ID before accessing the porn? If you use another means, surely you will no longer be in the mood for accessing a porn site…

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Fortunately, this is easy to work around, just get a VPN hosted in a didn’t different state or country.

    We have something similar here in Utah, so I have a WiFi network that is always connected to a VPN in a neighboring state. If something isn’t accessible, I just swap WiFi networks and I’m good.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        There are free VPNs as well, such as Proton’s free tier, or Tor. So you’ve got options.

        But yes, I absolutely agree that this shouldn’t be necessary. My point is that it’s largely unenforceable if you put in a tiny amount of effort.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          The porn is just the first place they start, their plan is to label anything lgbt as pornographic and require a similar process to view basic educational content. This is how they get around the 1st amendment.

          • win95@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Oh yeah I do see the slippery slope of this whole deal, the only thing that irked me was the wording of this comment as if xhamster is a basic human freedom, but I find that a little odd since xhamster and pornhub steal from sex workers to provide it “for free” y’know.

            But with the banning of books and trans people unable to get in or out of the country… It is fucked up and scary.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              There’s a correlation between people who swallow stupid right wing talking points and people who were unsuccessful educationally. It may be unproductive to take your rhetorical question literally and attempt to provide factual information in response.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Not sure, but it’s very ironic coming from “the land of the free”. Every day there is an american coming out in the Internet with the classic “you don’t have freedom of speech”, and then they have to provide a driving licence for a quickie

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Seems like it became so, yea

          But it’s more a question of anonymity / privacy while doing those things

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states. Like, I grew up with piracy, torrents, and old school forums. These educated me on computers enough that I made a career out of it. And most of that computer knowledge was gained because I wanted to see big tittied women sit on each other’s faces. These laws don’t stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

      And this is definitely not one of the cases of “oh it’ll reduce numbers overall though”. No the fuck it won’t. It’s porn. They’re gonna access it. Literally every YouTuber they watch is sponsored by a VPN.

      The only healthy thing to do is actually talking to your kids about porn. Educating them on its potential harms. But Republicans don’t ever want to talk to their kids. Ironically, these “drain the swamp” people just want daddy government to “prevent” their kids from accessing it. Which these laws don’t do.

      • daltotron@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states.

        You know I think a lot more of their politics and general life outlook makes more sense when you understand that probably a lot of these super old guys are not computer literate enough to look up their niche fetishistic porn interests, and are probably still consuming porn the old fashioned way, which is becoming increasingly nonexistent even though it’s still something that actually exists. Plus the propagation of morally puritanical values means that if they kept any of that material around at all, they’d be hypocrites, so they can’t have that. Probably a lot of these dudes are walking around super pent up and sexually frustrated, I’d bet.

        We need to introduce local community college and library courses to teach these elderly boomers how to goon

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I think your theory is partially correct. But I think it’s just as likely they are gooners themselves. I feel like porn addiction (gooning) is more prolific which people that have reactionary beliefs. My theory is that their political leanings are a counter to their actual actions. I don’t think the gooner needs “material” to goon to. I think in it’s absence it will happen through a Macy’s magazine etc.

          It’s similar almost to priest being the most common pedos. I think these types of conservative/reactionary ideologies just create sexual suppression that manifest in addictive behavior. This is not to say that all conservatives are pedos. But to say that those beliefs combined with sexual suppression often creat these extremes. Whether it be addiction to gooning (outside of their access to goon material) or otherwise.

          Idk. I just think that it’s an unhealthy relationship with sexuality that any generation can fall pray to. But it’s happens more often based on the circumstances of each individual/generation. And it’s why it seems to be so extreme in both boomers and recent generations. They both are experiencing extreme economic material conditions/contradictions.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        These laws don’t stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

        Exactly. And it punishes the responsible sites that follow the law and drives people to the sketchier sites that don’t.

        If you want more viruses and identity theft, I guess this is a good law for you.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yep. If these red states actually cared about kids they’d care about proper sex education. But I think this stuff just proves that Republicans are afraid of sex. They had an awkward conversation about it with their dad once and have been leaving their wives unsatisfied for 30 years since. They have no idea what to do if their kid actually came home from school and asked them what the difference between a clitoris and a vagina was. They are absolutely afraid of the female body and it’s why they try to control it so much.

          Sorry. A bit of a rant. If this was a different conversation I’d have plenty to criticize about the sex industry too. But these conservatives don’t have enough brain cells to actually talk about the problems with it. So we have old men making laws that do nothing but make them feel better. Or it’s projection for their own porn addiction.

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    That’s what you voted for. You want republican rule taking away your freedoms. Well now you Floridains have what you wanted and voted for. Don’t be mad you made your bed and dont like the sheets.

    • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      You know damn well not all Floridians voted for this shit. This is the same kind of out-group bullshit red hat shit bags do. You’re just being intentionally divisive.

          • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Endlessly being told “you don’t understand” by commenters who only use tv-friendly and repeatable povs and barely try to mask their hate towards their fellow citizens gets awful tiring huh? I left R-town to get away from the bloodlust but .world be too damn infested wit reddit 2.0 types fr

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            You have my sympathy, but not my compassion.

            My compassion ran out when America continued to embrace - even celebrate - right wing rule

            • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Yea that’s fair. We are an embarrassment to the world right now but for us to fix it we need to be working together instead of carving ourselves up into more little tribes.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Pretty sure if it were up to these people, the law would have never passed. And it would be repealed now.

            But it’s not. This is what the people of Florida voted for.

            • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              I didn’t vote for it, I didn’t want it, and just like the country I’m stuck with it. It’s acceptable to be an American and hate Trump and what he’s doing without being told you deserve it, but it’s not the same thing when it comes to Florida for some reason.

        • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Most people assume politicians don’t lie. I know it’s absurd to think about but even people of middling intelligence still deserve rights.

    • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Given how close most elections are and the low turnout, I would say at least 40% of voters and 50% of the population didn’t vote for this without even having to look at the election results.

        • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          There is so much voter suppression in the US. I didn’t realize some of the more subtle ways it was suppressed until I moved to a state that has way less of it.

          The US needs to end voter suppression. There are several ways of doing this but the top items: Mandate all election days (even those just at the state level) be paid holidays, automatically register all citizens to vote as soon as they turn 18, and make voting compulsory (not with punitive measures)

          In Texas, the following is routine suppression other than the common nationwide suppression: -People are often purged from voter registration even if they’re an active voter and voted in the last election. If you don’t check your registration months before the election, you’ll think you’re fine because you just voted but may show up and be told you’re no longer registered.
          -Voting registration is cut off 30 days before the election. This is on the high end of the cutoff and further increases chances you get purged, don’t realize it in time, and then can’t re-register.
          -Voting registration is mail in only. You have to physically print off the form and mail it in. This takes substantially more time when the post office is no longer a common trip for most people. It could easily be an online form like it is in many states.
          -Rotating polling locations and hours for early voting. If you try to vote early on a day off for instance, you may get to the polling location and realize it’s only open on certain days of the week while other locations are open the full week or it has arbitrarily reduced hours on certain days. Other locations may then be much farther from that location.
          -Polling locations far way from you. You may have to drive 30 minutes to 1 hour away to vote even in a city or if you don’t have a car, public transit may take prohibitively long (2+ hours one way) to get to the polling location. -Attacking mail in ballots as fraudulent and often throwing them out. Based on 2022 data, 6-20% are thrown out depending on the county.

          There are so many more little things which all add up to the purpose of preventing people from voting. No wonder people don’t vote or attempt to vote, can’t, get discouraged or don’t have more time off to vote, and give up

          • daltotron@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Expanding on this, a lot of this is very consistent in the amount by which it suppresses voters, and thus, much like gerrymandering, can be designed around or intentionally enacted. I mean, that’s sort of an obvious thing, but I think it’s still important to take note of and point out, much like gerrymandering and every other form of voter suppression, because it makes it all the more obvious that we do not live in a democracy, even by a little bit.

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Holy shit, that’s brutal.

            Glad where I live you just have to show up with an ID at the location assigned based on your permanent residency. Even passport is okay if ID is lost or expires.

            If you can’t, you can request a voter card that allows you to vote anywhere in the country. If you can’t vote physically, you can do mail-in.

            While voting is physical, you can request voter card via e-residency login. You can also call your local voting committee and request they come to your house directly if you are disabled, elderly, or unable to come.

        • Somewhiteguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I would love to agree here, but I live in an area where they do such a piss-poor job of announcing when people need to vote, that even I have a hard time knowing all of the things and when they happen. I signed up for email/text alerts and they only go out a few days before voting day. For some people, that is not enough time to plan to be off and be at the polling place.

          The system is broken.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        By US standards it was a pretty high turnout.

        However, more people didn’t vote than voted for Trump.