so basically real life

I would pay to see cart narc take on JD

or at least ban things like styrofoam

I think you’ll find that there’s still quite a crowd that would. UBI for sure would help curb the those on the street scene just trying to pay to survive. But there’s a huge group of only fans models that do things not to survive, but rather to become ultra wealthy

Execs are furiously taking notes right now

Serious question, couldn’t you bypass this by just setting up different LLCs that only have one or two properties under them?

not only that but we get a fresh look at why we were wrong and shouldn’t have asked the question in the first place

Found him again

Upon reading this comment, thousands of conservatives exploded into a fit of rage induced by a misplaced fear of oppression

It would technically be wrong because the dates would have no appropriate scale. The difference between each node could be wildly different and also irrelevant to the solution space this virtual representation is trying to convey. Egg before chicken, check

I don’t think that’s exactly the same situation though. Your comment reads as utilitarian, is that your reasoning for it? The object personification lends to an association of empathy for the object itself. Meaning that maybe the object is a human too and acts as we do

Finally I can put some take into this. I’ve worked in memory testing for years and I’ll tell you that it’s actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don’t probe memory cells typically unless we’re doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren’t responding correctly, then map those out.

None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we’ve improved over the last few decades

8g sure but this is only within 2% error. most scales would probably be within 3% so this isn’t surprising

HR should have replied with a “this was a test on how not to be an asshole and you’ve all failed. You must take the whole training again”