This is a twofer:

  1. The article itself
  2. HN’s take on it
  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is a field that attracts a lot of cranks (who are pretty recognizable as being cranks via various patterns). Being a well known physicist must be hell.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t even have to be well-known to get crank attention. Post anything with “quantum” in the title on the arXiv and they’ll find your e-mail.

      Source: this is one of the few times when I can say “trust me, bro” and be entirely sincere about it

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Back when I was an undergrad I saw a letter addressed to the department from a German gentleman who claimed to have invented a perpetual motion machine (this was the department of mechanics). I remember the letter being quite typographically florid and especially the author’s likeness in silhouette.

      My advisor had fun finding the flaw in the proposal. Took a few minutes.

      I often wondered if demolishing a PM suggestion would be a good extra credit question on an exam.