

MAGA hates AI (well, Big Tech):
(Originally The Verge: MAGA populists call for holy war against Big Tech)
https://www.theverge.com/politics/773154/maga-tech-right-ai-natcon
MAGA hates AI (well, Big Tech):
(Originally The Verge: MAGA populists call for holy war against Big Tech)
https://www.theverge.com/politics/773154/maga-tech-right-ai-natcon
I think it’s a very “edgy teenager” thing to say, regardless of what cultural or political tribe this mental teenager pledges allegiance to.
Promptfondlers on lobste.rs are unhappy about the tag “vibecoding”, used to denote development using GenAI. I’d not recommend reading the thread, just want to observe that if slop coding had actually taken the coding world by storm, I doubt there would be much pearl clutchign about how slop-slingers are treated on the site. We’re talking about people willing to pay Scam Altman money monthly after all.
JFC man, stop digging
Good news, everyone! A Wronger has Thoughts about Female Attractiveness
30 karma, 15 comments. Very Rational.
An update, a Concerned Citizen furrows their brow and Has Questions on how this was handled, about a week later
https://lobste.rs/s/zoirhl/appealing_ban_user_friendlysock
A predictable shitshow erupts, which leads to the creator of Anubis quitting the site, along with a few others.
At least I get more entries in my “lobste.rs assholes” list.
Worth noting is this text from the mod (https://lobste.rs/s/zoirhl/appealing_ban_user_friendlysock#c_6prapm)
This pattern was that every couple years there’d be a long string of cruel, dismissive, or discouraging comments. Not necessarily wrong, not outright abusive, not spam, not any one over the line, but all of them… just endless “ugh, this guy again?” and other users, more or less quietly, leaving rather than deal with it. This final comment called out in the modlog is one more example. The entire goal of the rhetoric is that it’s not explicit, it’s not outright libelous, it doesn’t even take personal responsibility for holding the opinion of the smear it insinuates. It’s deniable out of context, whether the missing context is the author’s writing history or the missing context is the old bigotry that trans people are pedophiles.
I’m not missing that context. The only thing I’m missing is the charity to think that somehow this time it’s different, that after a decade, this time it will the last time would be the last time I have to explain that this is a community where everybody’s going to be treated with some basic dignity. The other mods suggested the idea of a public apology but that didn’t work out, and absent a persuasive reason to expect this pattern wouldn’t continue, this ban stands.
Thanks for this write-up, I just saw the advisory and didn’t realize just how dumb the entire thing was.
They bet humanity’s future on the premise that very rich people would keep promises.
This seems very stupid to me.
deleted by creator
Enjoy this malicious prompt trying to find crapto secrets after a compromise
In 12 years we’ll get a book “My Mom Outsourced Raising Me to AI and it Broke Me”
No True AI Deployment
WTF is wrong with these people
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=wFmCveaxA5EnNtuCj
Sad if true. I really enjoyed his book The Wages of Destruction which mythbusts a lot of folk knowledge about the Nazis
https://gerikson.com/blog/books/read/The-Wages-of-Destruction.html
“Enjoy” this Wronger explaining human sexual attraction
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ktydLowvEg8NxaG4Z/neuroscience-of-human-sexual-attraction-triggers-3
I have but skimmed it, not plumbed its depths for sneers.
yeah sorry I had the username (“friendlysock”) in a first draft then forgot to add it
good riddance to bad rubbish
Yet another example of how acceptance of GenAI is increasingly coded as right wing