• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I know it’s not the point but Jesus fucking Christ then is not than. How fucking hard is it to notice that they’re two different words?

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Direct correlation between people that use “then” instead of “than”, and people who don’t use “of” after “couple”

      Laziness and ignorance

      Edit - the same people that say LaNgUagE iS alWAyS eVolViNg 😂

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah and people who say “could of” instead of “could have”. Writing is not just mimicking sounds you make out loud but they don’t seem to know it

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Direct correlation between

        There’s a certain irony in complaining about improper grammar while speaking in fragmented sentences. Why is it bad to omit “of” but not “There’s a” like you did?

        LaNgUagE iS alWAyS evolving

        It is.

            • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Nikki up there was lampooning me by suggesting that there was nothing wrong with missing a “couple words now and then” in order to humorously goad me for my previous statement about missing the word “of” in front of the word “couple”

              My riposte, as dull as it were, was to insinuate that they’d used the wrong “then/than”, thus harking back to the original subject of the admittedly pointless comment chain

              But well done you for spotting the deliberate error, and my condolences for the difficulties you must encounter daily with your reading comprehension 😊

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Idk maybe not everyone has a first language of english and had english lessons.

      Like english is literally my fourth best spoken language. And I’m disabked with cognitive issues.

        • Ember@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’m a native English speaker. Honestly… who cares? We can still understand them just fine. Do you speak four+ languages like they do? I studied a second language for 10 years in school and barely remember it. I self-studied a third for a couple of years and it’s HARD. What in the world do they have to be guilty for? Being way better at being multilingual than the average native English speaker?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            I obviously care. There is also nothing wrong with having pet peeves. Zero people need to agree with what my pet peeves are allowed to be. I see this dumb mistake all the time and that’s not really related to the linguistic status of this one individual.

            • Ember@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Sure, have your pet peeves. That’s perfectly fine. However, making someone feel bad about it and implying they should feel guilty, when they’ve already made a huge accomplishment in learning another language, isn’t. You’re not wrong, but you’re still an asshole.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The vast, vast majority of these simple mistakes are native speakers

        ESL speakers know better