• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yup. Characters should remain consistent if it’s important.

    Tonto should not have been played by Johnny Depp. Gross.

    The original Ancient One was a poor stereotype of a Tibetan person and Tilda Swinton is cool so I’m ok with this one.

    Liam Neeson is a great actor with a ton of gravitas and he pulled off the role well, but yeah shoulda found a middle eastern dude. Maybe that hot Jin dude from American Gods can be the next Ras Al Ghul.

    Anything to do with Scarlet Witch’s background is a retcon, she was originally introduced as Magneto’s moustache twirling daughter. Despite her tan in the referenced photo she’s more often depicted as white, but I could see her being middle eastern. 🤷‍♂️

    Lastly, she’s a fucking mermaid. Who gives a shit? How many of the dude bros bitching even watched it?

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even after the white washing debate we got the biggest white wash ever. The Indian ruler of Asia Khan noonien Singh, played by the whitest man in existence. Benedict Cumberbatch.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean tbf, all of the above have people enraged and people who dgaf, it’s just those flip flop depending. I’m sure there’s no shortage of people here, in this very thread, that aren’t cool with say Native Americans being played by white people, or that Scarlet Johansen played that one lady from GITS (can’t remember her name, never really got into that series, but she’s supposed to be Asian.) Understandably so, really, but still.

    I take it a step further personally, stop remaking anything and if you adapt say a comic or book, stick as close as humanly possible to the source material. Race/genderswapping and reboots for a moneygrab is cool or whatever but can we have good original stories again please?

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      My issue with Scarlet funnily enough is that she’s Scarlet. She’s too big of a star to really meld into the majors role. I just felt like I was watching black widow on screen. Sorta spoilers for anyone who cares but

      Tap for spoiler

      the majors body is full on robot so technically she could be any nationality and color but it would have fit better if they picked someone who fit her original motif since it sorta matters. With the whole, ghost in the machine thing. I’m a huge fan of the franchise and I’m sad that this was the big live action debut.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I can get behind that too, but I was referring to the backlash at the time it was released, it was all “cast people of that race to play a character of that race because inclusion is good.” Iirc there was one around the same time that played a trans person but wasn’t a trans person who received backlash too.

  • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate it because it’s disney and we all know that it’s just a braindead money grab virtue signaling and has nothing to do with actual representation or inclusion. Make another Miles Morales, not this.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Only if it turns our he is a distant cause of Black Panther or has ties to so.e super rich people. Disney does not care about the poors.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    What really confuses me about the outrage over casting a black actor to play the little mermaid is that a mermaid is a fictional creature. Why are people so upset that a fictional creature doesn’t fit what their particular preference is?

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago
          1. The Little Mermaid has changed so much since Hans Christian Anderson it cannot really be considered Danish anymore.

          2. Yes they would and rightfully so. I dislike the casting of the movie, it just so happens the movie was bad enough on its own.

    • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It should be as realistic as possible. My Ariel is fish colored for the same reason fish are. Maybe greenish blue for water camouflage, or grayish for sea floor camouflage, or brightly patterned if she lives near coral reefs or is poisonous. I’d love a cuttlefish mermaid for the flashing colors but I guess that’s not technically a fish, not sure if it matters.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      So what is white if Romani isn’t?

      Race science is less a formal science and more a series of excuses for doing social murder and war crimes.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whiteness, at least from a racist perspective, isn’t really about skin color, it’s more like a club for ‘approved’ ethnicities. There’s many Italians with darker skin than Mexicans, but Italians are considered ‘white’ and Mexicans are not. Same for large parts of the Middle East and Asia.

      Romani are white skinned Europeans, but they’re not ‘racist approved’, so they make up rumors they’re actually from Egypt and omit them from the White Club.

      The determination for what counts as white is highly inconsistent. Before the 1700s Germans were not considered white. Before the 1800s Irish were not considered white. For a time in the 1900s Finnish people were considered Asian (while many Finns were striking for better working conditions, what an odd coincidence). Italians weren’t considered white until about a hundred years ago. It goes on and on.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The American concept is deceptively complex. At first it’s just literally skin color. The Simpsons meme with the cop holding the color swatches is absolutely true. Then it’s about stereotypes. So yeah your skin is light, but are you anything they have a stereotype about? Their entire concept of self relies on stereotypes being true. Otherwise they can’t be smarter just because they’re of pure European descent.

    • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Roma people have historically been very persecuted because of racism and ethnocentrism. Case in point: the holocaust killed up to 500,000 Romani people, but the actual figures are not known. Roma people are among the groups that are rarely talked about when the Holocaust is mentioned, despite losing up to 50% of their total population at the time.

      Arab and North African folks are usually considered white on the US census but that isn’t really an accurate picture.

      Race is a social construct that doesn’t have clear borders. Racial categories mostly exist as a way of creating division and limiting access to resources, to flatten the diversity of individual cultures represented by a racial category… or to inflict direct and systemic violence. The experience of being a racialized person is entirely the creation of the society that a person lives within; for example, African folks usually don’t self-identify as “black,” within Africa, but that’s an important racialized experience that people can speak to in a place like the US.

      • seejur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Holocaust killed Russian and Jews as well, which are white. In fact I would say the Holocaust killed mainly white people.

        Racism is not limited to skin color

          • seejur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, the point I’m trying to make is that people’s color is only tangent is racism (but of course it helps to highlight differences between different group of people). That’s why Roma, even if white, are still discriminated against. Sorry if I misunderstood your point, or not made mine clear

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Okay well if you want to get into that, the concept of whiteness is very selective to racists. Roma, Jews, and (until recently) Russians are not considered white. The very fact that they were targeted the way they were tells us that. They may have white skin but that doesn’t matter to the concept because they aren’t in the club.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Other people have longer explanations which are great. I just wanted to point out Romani people are not Romanian even though many Romani people have settled in Romania. It’s just a coincidence.

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Romani people are Indo-Aryan, more closely related to modern day Indian people than Europeans. They typically have darker skin than Europeans as well. It’s not really an American concept either; I’ve generally seen a lot more anti-Romani sentiment in Europe than the US.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    To me, the weirdest one was Johnny Depp as a Native American. Like I couldn’t wrap my head around it in the movie. I kept thinking the plot was that he was a delusional person who believed he was Native American.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The problem is that it’s commercial driven. They want the big stars who just happen to be white. But then want to sell inclusivity for profit that lead to questionable creative decisions.

    The rage is misdirected but not wrong. Representation is important but is being exploited by soulless corporate robots.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      But one of the points is those big stars don’t just happen to be white. Throughout the years, a variety of conditions made it more likely that big stars would be white. Continuing to cast them for their star power instead of fitness for source, is pretty much the definition of “systemic racism”

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah the “happen to be” was meant to be slightly sarcastic. The only answer is to make conscious and smart decisions to be more inclusive and representative instead of profit motive. Unfortunately there seems a lot of pushback with hatewagons that will make producers more conservative.

  • Focal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like there’s a lot of cherry picking here too, because if we take the MCU, it also does some race swapping that nobody has a problem with.

    Nick Fury is one, but Samuel L Jackson is so cool in that role, it doesn’t matter.

    Heimdal is another one. Norse mythology, probably not a lot of black there, but Idris Elba is also so damn cool in the role that it does not really matter, and I’ve never heard anyone complain about these people.

    I think in general it’s more about if the people in the roles do a good job or not. Tilda Swinton did a great job. Johnny Depp… Maybe not so much, but I also do remember people were mad about that one.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Valid point. Although I bet there would have been some outcry if they had cast anyone without red hair TBH. Some people are just obsessed with red hair.

    But there would definitely have been less outrage if they casted a blond white lady instead of a black lady. Still relevant point.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Let’s not forget this simple aspect:

    Interesting character - Seasoned Actor

    Interesting character - Seasoned Actor

    Interesting character - Seasoned Actress

    Interesting character - Seasoned Actress

    Interesting character - Just some Chick

    In the end studios want money above anything else. And big names rake in bigger money.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    if white is being used this generically then romani should be listed as white and arab should be middle eastern and tibetan asian if not lumping both as asian.

    • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Romani are actually a group of Indians who traveled up to Europe I believe over 1000 years ago, according to recent dna testing. The history of why the group migrated is lost to time. After so many generations a few white people got in there certainly, but originally people thought they were egyptian.

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I honestly don’t care at this point. New Ariel sucks not because they switched her to black, but because it just sucks as a whole. The only thing that’s actually kinda pissing me off is…

    …could we stop swapping gingers with blacks? Please? Pretty please? Both are minority, ffs. But one is even kinda rarer than the other. Go on, switch the blondie, but leave the ginger as ginger ;-;