PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoPoorly socialized rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square239fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagePoorly socialized rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square239fedilink
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 month agoIt was implied (if not outright said, which I believe they did but whatever it’s a possibly made-up sister from a random person on the internet.)
minus-squarepetrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoNope. When you’re talking about demographics, you do not need to carve out exceptions for every single little outlier—it would be useless to talk about them otherwise.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoIt implies they had some bad dates.
It was implied (if not outright said, which I believe they did but whatever it’s a possibly made-up sister from a random person on the internet.)
Nope.
When you’re talking about demographics, you do not need to carve out exceptions for every single little outlier—it would be useless to talk about them otherwise.
It implies they had some bad dates.