• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          By definition, cows are female.

          Your joke sucks, unless it’s a “onejoke”, in which case it sucks even more.

          Nut milk comes from bulls, now that’s a better joke.

          • Mature female cattle are called cows

          • Mature intact male cattle are bulls

          • Young female cattle are called heifers

          • Young male cattle are oxen or bullocks

          • Castrated male cattle are known as steers.

          • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was going to suggest digging up, but you’re on track to reach orbit if you maintain tunnelling on this bearing and momentum.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think I am just thankful for the giant feature length works of art that descend once a year crafted with the forethought and precision of one who refuses to compromise on the lengthy process of research.

      • NormalPerson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, I like that YouTubers like hbomber and Oki take time on their videos. It’s like a gift when you see that upload pop up in your feed and you know you have something to look forward to later.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Sure, quality over quantity. They should also apply that to these 4 hour plus monstrosities everyone seems to do now. Ain’t nobody got time for that. It was fun when it was an exception, but now all these youtubers are doing it. 30 minutes or so is plenty to get your ideas across with ample time for constructing your arguments and providing context.

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The really funny thing about this is OP is egregiously wrong.

    Soy doesn’t contain estrogen, it contains phytoestrogen, which not only doesn’t produce any estrogen-like side-effect, but actively prevents our bodies from taking and producing estrogenic hormones.

    This is all very ironic, considering drinking excessive cows milk leeches calcium out of our bones and exposes us to a smorgasbord of hormones not designed for humans.

    Soy is shit tier anyway, oat milk all the way.

          • Zozano@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re right. After looking it up it seems like I’ve had some bad intel.

            I’ve corrected my previous post.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t totally believed this, but I also think its potentially useful to spread anyway. Sure, misinformation is bad, but so is climate change. Which one is worse?

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Misinformation is always worse in the long run.

          If people find out you knowingly lied about one thing, they’ll assume you lied about other things that are more important, regardless of evidence.

          Climate change being an excellent example of this where it wasn’t so much lies as bad guesses and so many people dismissed it despite the growing evidence.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            People still eat their carrots thinking it improves their vision.

            I mostly agree with you, but but I haven’t seen evidence either way saying it doesn’t have this effect.

            • Zozano@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Just because something hasn’t been proven one way or the other doesn’t mean you should just believe either of them on a whim.

              It’s totally okay to hold beliefs tenuously and then not feel attached to them when they’re proven wrong.

              It happened to me here in this thread. I stated cows milk leeched calcium, but it doesn’t, I was misinformed. There’s no shame in admitting I was wrong, but it reminds me to be more cautious about assertions of fact in the future.

              I don’t want to be wrong any longer than I need to be.

      • ngwoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        At this point I just don’t believe anything weird anyone has to say about food humanity has eaten for thousands of years unless they can back it up with real studies from real medical journals.

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just do this with everything that is advertised as something big. The hidden danger of food. Source? What the president of a country said about its own country. Source? Anything not trivial gets treated as misinformation unless proven.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right?!

          Its all just marketing. We die for whatever reason anyways just let me eat in peace!

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Amazing, prior to today I didn’t know people could have this much information on soy and still end up objectively incorrect about its position relative to oat milk.

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Go fuck yourself buddy. You and your non-oat-centrered world view need to check your privilege.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If soy did do this, red states would be trying to regulate it so trans people couldn’t buy it.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Out of all the things you can make out of soy, why milk? Tofu exists and it’s grand-master based food. I’ll smash several plates of mapo tofu without hesitation. Soy sauce, edamame, all ridiculously good shit.

  • daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How the fuck does this get posted all the time without anyone ever picking up on the fact that this workplace dynamic is obviously made up and anon is literally a 4chan kid who just changed the actors in his story from '‘teacher’ and “classmate” to ‘boss’ and ‘coworker’ so he wouldn’t get banned on an 18+ imageboard.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The soy thing has to be one of the funniest delusions I’ve ever seen.

    People convincing themselves that all liberals are vegans, all vegans eat a diet primarily of soy, and that soy has compounds similar to estrogen, so therefore all liberal men are feminized by their diets and are therefore weak (because being a woman is bad).

    The number of weird things you have to believe out of insecurity to get to that conclusion are quite embarrassing. It’s quite a self-report.

    You can also reverse the argument into mockery, accusing conservative women of being too masculine because they don’t eat enough soy, then bragging about how feminine soy-loving liberal women are.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Finding a reason to completely disregard not just the ideas but even the humanity of huge swaths of other people is conservatism 101. Just give in to your most base tribal tendencies, and “know” that all those good-sounding ideas are in fact wrong and evil because they’re coming from the wrong/lesser people.

      When you can’t argue against ideas, argue against the people saying them. See if ad-hominem attacks will work on people. (narrator: they did)

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also why the most deeply delusional MAGAs have to convince themselves that Tim Walz is gay - because a gun toting bird-hunting liberal does not compute for them.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hunting birds is gay now, actually.

        Men hunt boars and shit like that. Moose. Bison. Bears.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “feminism is bullying me”

    lol what a self-own. Incels and antifeminists are stupid af. Give the patriarchy enough rope to hang itself

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    On that day, anon found out he really is a soyboy soyjack. Did he learn anything else? Nobody cares, only that soyboy won’t manage to pull that on anyone at work.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Internet soyboy meets world.

      The men are not impressed by what he tells them of what he has learned.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What kind of fuckin idiot thinks that soybeans have synthetic female hormones of a caliber that would feminize you or whatever.