The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 5 months agoMake it stop.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageMake it stop.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square213fedilink
minus-squareIphtashuFitz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoShit like this results in an automatic “No Tip” from me.
minus-squarecybersandwich@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoI’ve started to do that. If I don’t see 10-20% options, I’ve started doing no tip–even if I would have tipped more. It irks me. They’d done some data analysis and I guess if you show higher percentages people just click them. So I am bringing it back to reality with my 0%.
minus-squareviking@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoMany people habitually click the lowest option, so they made the lowest option outrageously high. Fuck tips, I always go for a flat zero.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoIf the system is shitty enough to allow negative tips then I would also think it might be shitty enough to do something like treat it as unsigned and add a 4,294,967,196% tip.
Shit like this results in an automatic “No Tip” from me.
I’ve started to do that. If I don’t see 10-20% options, I’ve started doing no tip–even if I would have tipped more.
It irks me.
They’d done some data analysis and I guess if you show higher percentages people just click them. So I am bringing it back to reality with my 0%.
Many people habitually click the lowest option, so they made the lowest option outrageously high. Fuck tips, I always go for a flat zero.
Custom tip > -100%
If the system is shitty enough to allow negative tips then I would also think it might be shitty enough to do something like treat it as unsigned and add a 4,294,967,196% tip.