• Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yikes. I’ve never read Asterix and Obelix, but did they really make (I assume) the only black character a straight up knuckle-dragging gorilla imitation? 😬

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Cartoons back then were a little bit sambo so to speak, but the intent wasn’t strictly malicious, just uninformed.

          You use the words/concepts you know to express something to an audience. If society tells you that native Americans wear headdresses, then you will likely add a headdress when introducing a new native american character, not neccesarily realising the damage of the stereotype behind it.

        • d00ery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          He’s possibly the only reoccurring black character, and yes it is very much a product of its time.

          In defense of the authors the Gauls are all depicted with large bulbous noses, the Romans with Roman noses, etc; all cariceturs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caricature.

          In the attached image you can see Obelix is also depicted as a “knuckle dragger” (at times). The character leading them is a Roman.

          This second example shows the Vikings.

    • practisevoodoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The fact that it’s a joke about genAi and that joke is a rehash of existing material is rather on point though.

    • halvar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s a paraphrase of a culturally significant webcomic inserted into a more modern context without it’s original meaning being altered.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t know if I’d call it a paraphrase when it’s using 90% the exact same words.

        without it’s original meaning being altered.

        I think you mean “without its original meaningfully being altered.”