• Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yikes. I’ve never read Asterix and Obelix, but did they really make (I assume) the only black character a straight up knuckle-dragging gorilla imitation? 😬

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cartoons back then were a little bit sambo so to speak, but the intent wasn’t strictly malicious, just uninformed.

        You use the words/concepts you know to express something to an audience. If society tells you that native Americans wear headdresses, then you will likely add a headdress when introducing a new native american character, not neccesarily realising the damage of the stereotype behind it.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He’s possibly the only reoccurring black character, and yes it is very much a product of its time.

        In defense of the authors the Gauls are all depicted with large bulbous noses, the Romans with Roman noses, etc; all cariceturs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caricature.

        In the attached image you can see Obelix is also depicted as a “knuckle dragger” (at times). The character leading them is a Roman.

        This second example shows the Vikings.