Explain the absolute takes on the Russian war by Jeremy Corbin and Noam Chomsky. They have encouraged Ukraine to surrender, which is tacit approval of Russia’s invasion by giving Russia everything that they ever asked for
What the actual fuck? War efforts are what’s needed. Because you know, people are dying because of Russian bombs. It’s shooting back that saves lives. Defending their viewpoints is basically tacit approval of wars of aggression.
People who advocate for peace with Russia are in fact advocating for Ukrainian surrender. That’s because Russia’s condition IS surrender. If they had more modest goals, that would be one thing
You did take a stance, but you’re trying to hide it to appear to be neutral. Which you’re not, because you can’t see that they are actually supporting Russia by saying Ukraine has the choice to surrender
Explain the absolute takes on the Russian war by Jeremy Corbin and Noam Chomsky. They have encouraged Ukraine to surrender, which is tacit approval of Russia’s invasion by giving Russia everything that they ever asked for
Explain Hassan shilling for Hamas
You mean the grifter? He knows what he is doing. And he is doing this on purpose.
Show me where Corbyn and Chomsky has said this.
https://twitter.com/achkhikvadze/status/1786879477919649927
He is just saying Ukraine can’t win so it has to accept Russia’s terms (which are basically surrendering its sovereignty)
I guess it’s just a pure coincidence that it’s now perfectly clear that Ukraine can’t win, eh?
Ukraine actually can’t lose as long as it has the support of the free world
Here’s Corbyn doing his job as a Russian asset trying to stop the flow of weapons into Ukraine
https://twitter.com/brianklaas/status/1554360196935335936
Neither of those say what you say they said…
Corbin says he encourages “peace” efforts rather than war efforts, which you know duh everybody does.
Chompsky is similar, why or rather now are you twisting either of those in your head to mean something else?
What the actual fuck? War efforts are what’s needed. Because you know, people are dying because of Russian bombs. It’s shooting back that saves lives. Defending their viewpoints is basically tacit approval of wars of aggression.
Notice I didn’t take a stance I simply stated that what you said that article contained is not in fact the truth.
People who advocate for peace with Russia are in fact advocating for Ukrainian surrender. That’s because Russia’s condition IS surrender. If they had more modest goals, that would be one thing
Again notice how I didn’t take a stance I just said you’re a liar. Address having zero credibility at this point first and go from there.
You did take a stance, but you’re trying to hide it to appear to be neutral. Which you’re not, because you can’t see that they are actually supporting Russia by saying Ukraine has the choice to surrender
Here’s what I typed…
Did you misunderstand, perhaps? Here’s what I absolutely did not say…
Is any of this getting through to you?