• Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not about LOSING the young vote. Not voting is the default position for young people… Always has been (although each generation has gotten better about this)… The question is “how can I keep supporting genocide and still get young people to actually show up and vote?” And of course the answer is bully them relentlessly and never give them anything they ask for /s

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    so far they have tried AI generated blondes saying they will vote for Trump. Guess that did not work.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is the thinking that Trump will somehow be better? Like holy shit how short sighted are these people? Do they not remember anything from when he was president?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They remember, and they want it back. They’re fascists who are too cowardly to claim the label - which is impressive, as fascists are generally pretty cowardly to begin with.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This line of thinking implies there are only two possible positions: “Uncritical support for Biden” and “I’m going to criticize genocide and I also want to let fascists rule, for some reason”. Have you thought that perhaps you’re missing a lot of nuance about what people think?

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s a binary choice dude. One or the other will win.

          I give somewhat of a pass to comments that say “Biden is the only sane choice, but he’s wrong for this”. Comments that just shit on Biden are obvious attempts to suppress the Democratic vote.

          • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Right, it couldn’t be that normal humans beings are fucking horrified at their own country enabling a genocide, and demanding every single criticism of the Democratic Party to be accompanied by “I will vote for them though” is reasonable.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Don’t worry. Even if you tell them you’re voting for Biden, they’ll ignore it every time you say it.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is the thinking behind this comment that Trump being worse excuses Biden of his failures? He is losing young people by funding a genocide. Not all people are pragmatic, unfortunately.

      So either we complain about people not being pragmatic and voting for someone they have a legitimate issue with, OOOORRRR we could be mad at the president of the United States breaking the law and alienating would be voters by giving weapons to a state that has been committing war crimes for over 7 months.

      Of course we can do both but let’s not pretend the major problem is “voters with morals” rather than “president aiding a genocide”

      It’s pretty fucking basic.

      • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are we all pretending Trump would somehow be better for the situation overseas?

        But hey let’s just not vote for democracy and hope it all just works itself out.

        • WamGams@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, they are pretending Trump will be better for Palestine.

          And all of them will go quiet when Trump enables total annihilation of the Palestinian people. Maybe some of them will find a way to blame Biden, but I think the majority of accounts will be abandoned the day after the election.

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            If you honestly think saying “Biden is not good on Palestine” is saying “Trump is better than Biden on Palestine” I think you have a way bigger problem than the outcome of the election

            • WamGams@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              If you feel that a comment said to somebody else doesn’t apply to you, it probably wasn’t directed at you.

              That being said, the people who are poisoning the well against Biden, the ones who have made Palestine the only issue affecting this election, the ones screaming “genocide Joe,” their actions are going to lead to more dead Palestinians than anything Biden has done.

              • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                My comment, then someone says “are we pretending trump will be better?” In response, then this person says “yes.” If they’re not talking to me and are just talking generally about other people that do this in reply to my comment, pretty weird, but my point still stands.

                their actions are going to lead to more dead Palestinians than anything Biden has done.

                Uh huh. Who has been arming Israel again?

                • WamGams@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  If the choice you get to make is 30,000 dead civilians or a person who outright said Israel needs to “finish the job,” and you are campaigning against the lesser amount of deaths, you bear moral responsibility when total annihilation happens.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Are we all pretending Trump would somehow be better for the situation overseas?

          Can you show me where I did that? You can even look through my comment history if you like. Didn’t happen here. Never happened anywhere.

          But hey let’s just not vote for democracy and hope it all just works itself out.

          Hey let’s just give weapons to someone we know is going to use it to commit war crimes in violation of our own laws and basic morals and hope the election just kind of works itself out.

          I agree democracy is important to protect and Biden needs to win in order to do that. That’s exactly the issue…

          …You know, if you’re solely thinking about American politics and not whether or not it’s bad to destroy every single hospital in a region and slowly starve children to death.

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If they got somebody clever, it could help mitigate damage (e.g. pointing out Trump’s own worse record, the fact that the GoP basically plans to erase democracy if they win, how some things people wanted are constantly being blocked by the GoP)

    Sure as hell won’t help regain lost votes, though

    To do that, Biden needs to stop supporting the genocide, or if unable to, make it clear exactly why he is unable to

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Biden isn’t going to win by converting Trump voters. Anybody who still thinks Trump is the best choice for America is not going to change their mind at this point. They are lost causes.

      Biden is going to win by breaking apathy and making people realize that he is incredibly limited (by the Republican-led House) on what he can do in Israel. The genocide is popular with both leading parties. It sucks. Get over it.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean it worked in 2020. Biden started the campaign with effectively a Republican slate of policy positions. Until the ratfucking on Sunday before super Tuesday, Bernie was running away with it.

      To get Bernie’s voters, Biden basically did a lift and shift of Bernie’s entire policy platform. This got him the support of Bernie’s massive grassroots movement, and is what won the election (and why we’ve seen such a progressive slate of domestic policies from Biden). At that time, Biden learned from the lesson that Hillary didn’t: You can’t shame voters into supporting you; you have to prioritize their issues.

      Biden can do the same now. Its actually pretty easy to do so. He can come out strongly and say something like “While we still support our ally Israel, this genocide is wrong, and the extermination of a people is never an acceptable answer. Never again means never again, for any community”

      And like you said, he can also just explain exactly why he is unable to do certain things. He can can just send some very strong signals.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Biden won in 2020 because Trump absolutely botched the national pandemic response. Now Biden is dealing with a recession on all but name, meteoric inflation, a war in Europe, and a genocide in Gaza. He obviously can’t do much for the economy, but he has the deck stacked against him and is going to need the youth and muslim votes if he hopes to win in November. All he has really done for young voters is a few waves of student loan forgiveness. Nothing he does will win over “moderate” Republicans, so he needs to rally support from young voters.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He’s wiped student loan debt for around 4.75 million people. Sounds like a lot but then you realize there’s 45,000,000 with student loan debt and $1,750,000,000,000 total student loan debt.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            He’s wiped student loan debt for around 4.75 million people

            He didn’t wipe the debt out, he just stopped fighting in the courts over an existing loan forgiveness program that Betsy DeVos had decided to fuck with during Trump’s first term. And the bulk of this loan forgiveness came as part of a deal that required 10 years of employment in a public sector career. Fucking with it meant undermining recruitment efforts by the Pentagon, the FBI, etc.

            Biden is trying to take credit for a Clinton Era Program, not unilaterally writing off billions in debt.

            Even setting aside the fact that $7B isn’t even a percentage point on outstanding debt, this is purely headline gore and has little to do with Biden’s domestic policies.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I believe this is referring to the famous Sunday meeting with all of the centrist candidates and former president Obama. This happened right after Bernie won the South Carolina primary.

          As a result of that meeting, buttigieg dropped out and endorsed biden (He got Secretary of Transportation)

          Klobuchar also dropped out and endorsed Biden. (She got Chairman of the Rules Committee)

          Warren, also at the meeting, stayed in the race to split the left-leaning vote.

          This backroom meeting was the turning point for the primaries. Previous to this meeting, Bernie had a solid lead. Afterwards, it was all Biden.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This happened right after Bernie won the South Carolina primary.

            Right after Bernie won the Nevada primary and shortly before he swept California. Biden won South Carolina in a landslide, thanks to a coalition of Atlantic Coast conservative democrats throwing their corporate lobbyist fueled and Pentagon endorsed support to the most reactionary candidate in the race.

            Warren, also at the meeting, stayed in the race to split the left-leaning vote.

            This gets overstated. Warren got her knife into Bernie’s back when she accused him of psychically tanking the Hillary campaign. But she had next to no impact on the Midwestern primaries, where Biden trounced Bernie. That was much more about COVID depressing turnout and all the other midwestern candidates dropping out.

            Previous to this meeting, Bernie had a solid lead.

            He had a few break out states on the West Coast, but he wasn’t yet polling above the 50% line. The Obama endorsement combined with the Klobacher/Buttigieg dropouts consolidated support behind Biden in the Rust Belt. It likely would have been a horse-race into the convention, but it wasn’t a sure thing.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem with Biden saying he can’t do things is that Trump will just come out the next day and say, “this problem would be solved on day one of my presidency.”

        Would it be true? Absolutely not. Would it matter? Absolutely not.

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Doesn’t matter… NO ONE is on the fence between Biden and Trump… Anyone on the fence is sitting between Biden and just not showing up… And for most of them, ‘just not showing up’ is the default… They need to be convinced to show up FOR someone, not against someone

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If you want an honest answer, it’s because for every 1 of the “stop the genocide” people, there’s 2 people who support Israel’s campaign to bomb Palestine. Mainly because Hamas is often seen as representing the Palestinian people and have done everything in their power to destroy sympathy for Palestinians, and secondarily because US-based advocates for a free Palestine have used methods that seem primarily designed to piss people off like setting up camps in public spaces and accusing random passers-by of partaking in genocide.

      Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-israel-gaza-poll-cbs-news/ Even after a shift away from Israel, only 37% think the US should even encourage Israel to stop the campaign. To me military aid to Israel makes exactly zero sense. But I also live in reality, and cutting off aid entirely would be political suicide until advocates for it do a better job of actually being convincing.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Young people: “Please provide an alternative to Democrats who are moving too slowly to help minorities and the poor”
    Trump campaign: “We need plans for a christofascist oligarchy literally run by a billionaire and his spoiled kids”

  • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    How do you do fellow kids?

    I need you to picture the meme, please. Errr… I still don’t know how to put pics in the comments. Sooo…