In light of the dev silently blacklisting blahaj.zone, many of its users and several other instances, we have removed tesseract from the available lemmy front ends we offer.

  • ItWasntMe@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just logged in this afternoon and saw all this going on with Tesseract. Does anyone have a link to an article or summary of what is going on? I heard of this program until lemmy got a bunch of posts about it. lol

  • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    took me a while to realize that tesseract is also the name of a lemmy frontend. because there’s also tesseract-ocr which is used for optical character recognition. (i started using tesseract-ocr yesterday to scan all my meme images for text to make them easily searchable).

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This comment is likely a bit too close to the line for this instance. Blahaj is governed by guidelines rather than rules, and that sounded quite like a comment intended to cause harm. By all means criticize and condemn people for their actions, but this isn’t the place to post veiled wishes for harm. Its not the vibe of this instance.

      You’d probably be fine saying that on lemmy world, but comments like that rather iffy here.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I have no way to put anything into action nor any desire to do so in earnest… but thanks for letting me know, I’ll keep it in mind. 👍

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the deal with this Tesseract developer? Did they just block everyone that has ever looked at them funny? I looked at the blocklist and saw all kinds of people: trans-oriented, piracy-oriented, and lots of tankie-oriented instances. And a lot of users I’d never heard of.

    Now they’ve taken their whole site offline, presumably so they won’t have to answer any questions.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Now they’ve taken their whole site offline, presumably so they won’t have to answer any questions.

      Tea is just all over the damn floor at this point.

      …but like… what did they think was gonna happen? Did they think they were so clever that no one could figure it out? Even when it effectively broke functionality on sites that used it but were blocked? Like they couldn’t add in code to disable specific parts of it if it was deployed on one of those sites so they could keep the whole thing secret? Like just a little text search string to ignore any users and sites that match the site domain as its rolling out, so they would keep using it and be none the wiser because it would work for them but continue to have its blocklist maintained and secret because it wouldn’t cause any problems.

      I hate that it takes me like zero effort to conceptualize a better way to have done this shady shit, but on the other hand I guess I’m just glad they weren’t that clever.

      • SatyrSack@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        EDIT: Upon reflection, I do wonder if this was at least partially vibe coded, because LLMs don’t have forethought and can’t plan ahead for contingencies like that. Because it also seems like a no-brainer that it would lead to configuration failures if deployed on one of the sites that is blocked.

        The dev was quite vocal about being against LLM usage. Most notably, I remember their April Fool’s Day post about an update that adds a bunch of AI features. The post was obviously just a big joke, full of disparaging comments about LLMs. With that said, that was April (maybe even 2025, I can’t remember). It’s possible that their opinion had changed in the time since. But I doubt it, personally.

              • Taleya@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Enjoy.

                My fave is a relatively new addition: they chose to release a “public statement” on their own instance that they could control and nowhere else then started complaining about cross linking and brigading when people shared it.

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  To be blunt: Tesseract is designed to attract and retain normies.

                  HOLY SHIT I FUCKING CALLED IT! They’re one of those freaks who wants to make this a huge shithole like reddit.

                  it’s genuinely an unhinged rant. They come so close to getting it “no matter what I did the people here would screech.” Maybe, just maybe, when your idea is antithetical to the communities goals, that means you somehow think you have ownership over this community and it’s direction. Maybe people don’t like that because it’s both dictatorial and ineffectual? It’s like on some level they understand exactly why no one will like this, but instead of being like “maybe I don’t actually have ownership of the community” he’s all “No, it’s the users who are wrong!”

                  Further, considering their username is an aging Star Trek reference and Star Trek nerds are rarely “normies” you’d think they would put two and two together and realize they’re probably not actually a “normie” themselves and so the idea that they would know “what a normie wants” is horseshit anyway.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah it might make more sense instead of doing the bit at all times to set up an alert or something for key words or phrases that would get Nicole to want to comment. You could potentially have a big log of randomized responses built into a bot to just auto-respond, and then you don’t have to do the bit at all, but you’d also have to take care to make sure the bot wasn’t so intrusive that it was as annoying as the “real” Nicole.

            • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve tagged you as “Greatest shitposter” and tbh I could see you doing that lmao.

              But … where is TotallyJessica?

  • raspirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This controversy over tesseract finally got me to do a bit more reading to understand how federation actually works and what a frontend does. Now I understand why everyone is so pissed.

    The email metaphor has been the most useful to me in understanding how this works. Someone tell me if I’ve got this right. Basically, you have your lemmy account, which belongs to the instance you created it on, like how a gmail account belongs to Google. You can use whatever frontend you like to view your feed, just like you could use Outlook to view your Gmail account. Tesseract is a frontend, kinda like Outlook in the metaphor. In theory, a frontend should deliver to you everything that would appear on your lemmy instance no matter where you access it from, but now the tesseract frontend is basically making content filtering decisions about what users, topics, and instances you have access to. It would be like if your Outlook app suddenly decided “ew, you shouldn’t be using your Gmail to talk to any of those yahoo mail people, and also it’s now forbidden to use Outlook to discuss seahorses.”

    So all the posts, users, and instances are still there, it’s just that the dev of your frontend decided that you shouldn’t interact with those users or discuss those topics anymore. Worse still, they surreptitiously tried to hide all of this new filtering among other features that are needed for spam and whatnot, leading people to think something was actually broken.

    Do I have that right?

    • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You win the internet for today!

      This explanation should really be somewhere easier to find. Especially when you’re wondering if it will go down on your permanent record.

      • raspirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m just glad I actually got it right. I was mostly typing up that comment just to make sure that my understanding was correct. I wasn’t even thinking at the time that it would be helpful to others as well. I guess I’ve been kind of assuming that everyone else on lemmy already understood how all of this stuff works. Happy to help!

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          http and https are communication protocols, www enables content sharing.


          You use a web browser, such as Firefox or Librewolf. When you put in a URL (Uniform Resource Locator) such as https://en.wikipedia.org/ in the address bar (which shows the current URL), you tell it to retrieve that URL.

          Almost all websites use HTTP or HTTPS (which is more secure, as it’s encrypted). The abbreviation stands for HyperText Transfer Protocol (Secure mode).

          The way of ‘retrieving’ that URL is often done through that HTTP(S). Web browsers for that reason can be called a ‘user agent’.


          Search engines, such as Mojeek, are essentially websites that link to other websites, using a search query.

          You can also sometimes use non-HTTPS methods, a few well-known examples are mailto and ftp (file transfer protocol) or database access like jdbc (Java database commectivity).


          The internet works by encapsulating the data into layers.

          After you send in the URL and method, the browser goes to look for the page. There are multiple layers to that. HTTP(S) belongs to the application layer, which tells “I make or have this data, I communicate with the same or another host”. The www uses the HTTP(S)’ rules to communicate.

          Then there’s the transport layer, that communicates “You’re on this host, I’m on that host”. TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is one of those.

          After that there’s the internet layer, which says “This is the host address, that is the host address, both worded in the same ways” and “I send this data to that data”. IP addresses are part of this one. Domains work through the DNS (Domain Name System) and you can think of them as more human-readable, more specific IP addresses.

          Then there’s the link layer which says “This is how things locally communicate on the same host without intervening routers.” Wi-Fi and ethernet are examples.

          There is another, that’s not necessarily part of it, but nonetheless relevant here: the syntax (or presentation) layer. It “translates what this application layer reads to another application layer”. An API is part of that.


          So, then, what are front and back ends?

          Think of the user interface; that is how you communicate with your computer. It’s what the ‘menus’ look like, how logos look like, etc.

          If your computer is a bicycle, what it looks like (the front end) is the user interface; and how the parts are connected, is the API. The back end is managing the previous layers I’ve mentioned.


          I hope that that kind of explains it!

  • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m a bit miffed that I’m not shadow blacklisted.

    But also wtf

    And lastly, porn is ok but GirlsFrontline is banned? Lol. It’s like an anime style game. Looks kinda stupid to me but i wouldn’t be shadow banning it

  • nature_man [he/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The fuck?? Why in the world is a front end blacklisting people or instances??

    ETA: This is literally the first thing I see after coming back from a break. Also, I’m so sorry you have to deal with this Ada, the dev sounds like a jackass